Figure 9
(a) The distribution of the GAMA galaxy sample spanning 0 < z ≤ 0.25. The model tracks from the top to bottom have the following IMF slopes, α=−2, −2.35, −3. This figure is similar to fig. 1 of Hoversten & Glazebrook (2008); the scale and model IMF tracks of both figures are the same. (b) The distribution of the redshift of the SDSS main sample and the GAMA sample for 0 < z ≤ 0.25. (c) The GAMA sample colour coded according to z. This sample covers the range 0 < z ≤ 0.25. It is clear that the reason the peak in the data density in top-panel lies higher than in the corresponding diagram from Hoversten & Glazebrook (2008) is because of the higher redshift range sampled.

(a) The distribution of the GAMA galaxy sample spanning 0 < z ≤ 0.25. The model tracks from the top to bottom have the following IMF slopes, α=−2, −2.35, −3. This figure is similar to fig. 1 of Hoversten & Glazebrook (2008); the scale and model IMF tracks of both figures are the same. (b) The distribution of the redshift of the SDSS main sample and the GAMA sample for 0 < z ≤ 0.25. (c) The GAMA sample colour coded according to z. This sample covers the range 0 < z ≤ 0.25. It is clear that the reason the peak in the data density in top-panel lies higher than in the corresponding diagram from Hoversten & Glazebrook (2008) is because of the higher redshift range sampled.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close