Figure 2.
Molecular evidences of LINE-1 insertion. (Upper; 1) Analysis of the LINE-1 insertion site. (Left) Lane A, Agarose gel, normal 46,XY control; lane B, mother of affected individual; lane C, affected individual; and lane D, DNA molecular weight marker. (Right) Sanger sequencing of the 5′UTR AR gene (5′-3′). The insertion starts as a poly(T) at c.-268 position (*index case; **normal male as control); (Middle; 2) Sequencing of the 5′UTR region of AR in the propositus. The 18-bp TSD is marked in gray. The entire inserted LINE-1 sequence is marked in blue. The 11-bp poly(T) is shown in red. This insertion is composed of 804 nt plus poly(A) sequence. This sequence is 99.7% identical to the 3′ end of the putative parental LINE-1HS sequence (AC002980). (3. Schematic representation of the full-length human LINE-1HS. (Upper; 3) The 5′-truncated form of the LINE-1 (nucleotides 5218 to 6021) with 3′-poly(A) tracts. (Middle; 3) Insertion in the 5′UTR region in the AR gene flanked by 18-bp TSD (5′-AAGATCTGGGCATCTTTT-3′) (lower; 3). (4) AR gene expression comparison between affected individual and control.

Molecular evidences of LINE-1 insertion. (Upper; 1) Analysis of the LINE-1 insertion site. (Left) Lane A, Agarose gel, normal 46,XY control; lane B, mother of affected individual; lane C, affected individual; and lane D, DNA molecular weight marker. (Right) Sanger sequencing of the 5′UTR AR gene (5′-3′). The insertion starts as a poly(T) at c.-268 position (*index case; **normal male as control); (Middle; 2) Sequencing of the 5′UTR region of AR in the propositus. The 18-bp TSD is marked in gray. The entire inserted LINE-1 sequence is marked in blue. The 11-bp poly(T) is shown in red. This insertion is composed of 804 nt plus poly(A) sequence. This sequence is 99.7% identical to the 3′ end of the putative parental LINE-1HS sequence (AC002980). (3. Schematic representation of the full-length human LINE-1HS. (Upper; 3) The 5′-truncated form of the LINE-1 (nucleotides 5218 to 6021) with 3′-poly(A) tracts. (Middle; 3) Insertion in the 5′UTR region in the AR gene flanked by 18-bp TSD (5′-AAGATCTGGGCATCTTTT-3′) (lower; 3). (4) AR gene expression comparison between affected individual and control.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close