Figure 1.
Natural cubic splines for the association of (A) PRAL, (B) NEAP, and (C) A:P with the predicted probability of NAFLD in (metabolic) model 3. (A) Model with PRAL vs model without PRAL (P = 0.038). (B) Model with NEAP vs model without NEAP (P = 0.015). (C) Model with A:P vs model without A:P (P = 0.012). The y-axis represents predicted probability of NAFLD in (metabolic) model 3: NAFLD ∼ DAL proxy + age + sex + education level + energy intake + study cohort + smoking + units of alcohol + physical activity + HDL cholesterol + triglycerides + metabolic syndrome + GFR + diabetes mellitus + BMI. The x-axis represents values of PRAL, NEAP, or A:P. The gray-colored bar represents the 95% CI. The upper and lower 2.5th percentile were excluded from the graphs.

Natural cubic splines for the association of (A) PRAL, (B) NEAP, and (C) A:P with the predicted probability of NAFLD in (metabolic) model 3. (A) Model with PRAL vs model without PRAL (P = 0.038). (B) Model with NEAP vs model without NEAP (P = 0.015). (C) Model with A:P vs model without A:P (P = 0.012). The y-axis represents predicted probability of NAFLD in (metabolic) model 3: NAFLD ∼ DAL proxy + age + sex + education level + energy intake + study cohort + smoking + units of alcohol + physical activity + HDL cholesterol + triglycerides + metabolic syndrome + GFR + diabetes mellitus + BMI. The x-axis represents values of PRAL, NEAP, or A:P. The gray-colored bar represents the 95% CI. The upper and lower 2.5th percentile were excluded from the graphs.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close