Figure 2.
A comparison of estimated surface gravity values from the deep learning regressor, log (g)DL, with asteroseismic surface gravity measurements from the Kepler DR25 stellar properties catalogue (Mathur et al. 2017), log (g)KSPC, for the 1430 stars in our validation sample. The green dashed line indicates a one-to-one relation, while the magenta dashed lines indicate ±0.1 dex deviations from the green line. For clarity, the errorbars of only every fifth blue point is plotted. Marginal detections are plotted in red, while predictions with large deviations from the one-to-one relation (>0.25 dex) that are visually verified to have inaccurately predicted νmax are highlighted in cyan.

A comparison of estimated surface gravity values from the deep learning regressor, log (g)DL, with asteroseismic surface gravity measurements from the Kepler DR25 stellar properties catalogue (Mathur et al. 2017), log (g)KSPC, for the 1430 stars in our validation sample. The green dashed line indicates a one-to-one relation, while the magenta dashed lines indicate ±0.1 dex deviations from the green line. For clarity, the errorbars of only every fifth blue point is plotted. Marginal detections are plotted in red, while predictions with large deviations from the one-to-one relation (>0.25 dex) that are visually verified to have inaccurately predicted νmax are highlighted in cyan.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close