Fig. 2
ERP analysis. (A) Main effect of action coherency. Left: scalp topography of significant activity for coherent vs scrambled movements, 300 ms after stimulus onset. Right: grand average waveforms for coherent (green) and scrambled (gold) PLDs. Bottom right: summed inverse P values across all sensors and time points revealed significant activity 288–330 ms after stimulus onset. (B) Main effect of content. Left: scalp topography of significant activity for emotional vs neutral movements, 1670 ms after stimulus onset. Right: grand average waveforms for emotional coherent (red), neutral coherent (blue), emotional scrambled (magenta) and neutral scrambled (cyan) PLDs. Bottom right: summed inverse P values across all sensors and time points revealed significant clusters of activity within our time window of interest, roughly 1288–1680 ms after stimulus onset.

ERP analysis. (A) Main effect of action coherency. Left: scalp topography of significant activity for coherent vs scrambled movements, 300 ms after stimulus onset. Right: grand average waveforms for coherent (green) and scrambled (gold) PLDs. Bottom right: summed inverse P values across all sensors and time points revealed significant activity 288–330 ms after stimulus onset. (B) Main effect of content. Left: scalp topography of significant activity for emotional vs neutral movements, 1670 ms after stimulus onset. Right: grand average waveforms for emotional coherent (red), neutral coherent (blue), emotional scrambled (magenta) and neutral scrambled (cyan) PLDs. Bottom right: summed inverse P values across all sensors and time points revealed significant clusters of activity within our time window of interest, roughly 1288–1680 ms after stimulus onset.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close