Figure 2.
(A) Association between radius and tibia total vBMD, tibia Ct Th, and FN aBMD and the risk of vertebral fracture in the whole group; in the subgroup of patients who are antiresorptive treatment naive; in the subgroups of patients according to osteoporotic status on central DXA (≥1 T-score <–2.5 SD at the lumbar spine, total hip, or FN) and FRAX-BMD intervention threshold for age (10-y fracture probability >10%). The P value of the interaction between groups is indicated. (B) Association between radius and tibia total vBMD, tibia Ct Th, and FN aBMD and various fracture outcomes: risk of single vertebral fracture in the upper panel; risk of multiple vertebral fracture in the lower panel. The P value of the difference between the outcomes is indicated.

(A) Association between radius and tibia total vBMD, tibia Ct Th, and FN aBMD and the risk of vertebral fracture in the whole group; in the subgroup of patients who are antiresorptive treatment naive; in the subgroups of patients according to osteoporotic status on central DXA (≥1 T-score <–2.5 SD at the lumbar spine, total hip, or FN) and FRAX-BMD intervention threshold for age (10-y fracture probability >10%). The P value of the interaction between groups is indicated. (B) Association between radius and tibia total vBMD, tibia Ct Th, and FN aBMD and various fracture outcomes: risk of single vertebral fracture in the upper panel; risk of multiple vertebral fracture in the lower panel. The P value of the difference between the outcomes is indicated.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close