Figure 2.
 Comparison of GSEA and GFA for miR-1 and miR-124 transfection data. GSEA ( A ) and GFA ( B ) were performed for the microarray data of HeLa cells transfected with miR-1, miR-124, mutant miR-124 (124mut5-6 and 124mut9-10) and chimeric miRNAs (chimiR-1/124 and chimiR-124/1) for 12 or 24 h. In GFA, we ran FAME for the two collection of leading-edge subsets, which were down-regulated (left panel) and up-regulated (right panel) in the cells transfected with miRNA relative to controls, in an enrichment direction of over-representation (enrichment, left panel) and under-representation (depletion, right panel), respectively. The distribution of GSEA normalized enrichment scores (NES) and GFA ranking [−log10( P -value)] are shown. GSEA NES and GFA ranking for miR-1 and miR-124 are indicated by red diamonds and blue circles, respectively.

Comparison of GSEA and GFA for miR-1 and miR-124 transfection data. GSEA ( A ) and GFA ( B ) were performed for the microarray data of HeLa cells transfected with miR-1, miR-124, mutant miR-124 (124mut5-6 and 124mut9-10) and chimeric miRNAs (chimiR-1/124 and chimiR-124/1) for 12 or 24 h. In GFA, we ran FAME for the two collection of leading-edge subsets, which were down-regulated (left panel) and up-regulated (right panel) in the cells transfected with miRNA relative to controls, in an enrichment direction of over-representation (enrichment, left panel) and under-representation (depletion, right panel), respectively. The distribution of GSEA normalized enrichment scores (NES) and GFA ranking [−log10( P -value)] are shown. GSEA NES and GFA ranking for miR-1 and miR-124 are indicated by red diamonds and blue circles, respectively.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close