Figure 4
P and S velocities, P delay and shear wave splitting calculated for three separate microstructural models shown at the top of the figure. Each model has the same modal fraction of muscovite (0.2), and the same muscovite (α= 0°) and quartz orientations (c-axis//y2), but a different distribution of muscovite grains. Results for the AEH-FE method are microstructure dependent, and therefore colour-coded for each of the models. Results for the Voigt and Reuss bounds, and geometric and arithmetic means, are not microstructure dependent and therefore identical for each model.

P and S velocities, P delay and shear wave splitting calculated for three separate microstructural models shown at the top of the figure. Each model has the same modal fraction of muscovite (0.2), and the same muscovite (α= 0°) and quartz orientations (c-axis//y2), but a different distribution of muscovite grains. Results for the AEH-FE method are microstructure dependent, and therefore colour-coded for each of the models. Results for the Voigt and Reuss bounds, and geometric and arithmetic means, are not microstructure dependent and therefore identical for each model.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close