Figure 2
Identified regions cluster into two functional networks, which show decreased across-network correlation in schizophrenia. Functional interrelationships among the detected regions, as represented in the region-by-region correlation matrices pooled across groups, were analysed by ( A ) principal component analysis (PCA), with a scatterplot constructed for the first two principal components for each region’s pattern of correlation. Analogous PCA results calculated on the corresponding group t -test matrix are shown in B . The results of K-means cluster analysis on the average correlation matrix (pooling groups) are shown using colour (magenta and green, matching Clusters 1 and 2 in Fig. 1 , respectively) in A and B . An ‘elbow’ plot constructed for K-Means cluster analysis ( C ) shows that the trade-off of variance explained versus the complexity of the cluster model (choice of K) is optimized at K = 2 clusters. Region-by-region correlation matrices sorted by cluster membership are then shown in D for controls, E for patients with schizophrenia, with the corresponding t -tests (Control-Schizophrenia) shown in F , having removed nuisance covariates of Age and Motion. The row/column order of regions of interest in the matrices is identical to those provided in Table 2 (regions 1–26 from bottom to top row and left to right column).

Identified regions cluster into two functional networks, which show decreased across-network correlation in schizophrenia. Functional interrelationships among the detected regions, as represented in the region-by-region correlation matrices pooled across groups, were analysed by ( A ) principal component analysis (PCA), with a scatterplot constructed for the first two principal components for each region’s pattern of correlation. Analogous PCA results calculated on the corresponding group t -test matrix are shown in B . The results of K-means cluster analysis on the average correlation matrix (pooling groups) are shown using colour (magenta and green, matching Clusters 1 and 2 in Fig. 1 , respectively) in A and B . An ‘elbow’ plot constructed for K-Means cluster analysis ( C ) shows that the trade-off of variance explained versus the complexity of the cluster model (choice of K) is optimized at K = 2 clusters. Region-by-region correlation matrices sorted by cluster membership are then shown in D for controls, E for patients with schizophrenia, with the corresponding t -tests (Control-Schizophrenia) shown in F , having removed nuisance covariates of Age and Motion. The row/column order of regions of interest in the matrices is identical to those provided in Table 2 (regions 1–26 from bottom to top row and left to right column).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close