| Quintile . | Rural* . | Urban* . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Assets . | Expenditure . | Asset . | Expenditure . |
| 1 (Poorest) | 12 (29.3) | 12 (40.0) | 26 (42.6) | 30 (50.8) |
| 2 | 12 (30.0) | 19 (40.4) | 20 (37.7) | 25 (48.1) |
| 3 | 15 (36.5) | 14 (25.9) | 37 (59.7) | 39 (56.5) |
| 4 | 15 (37.5) | 7 (17.2) | 27 (64.3) | 26 (68.4) |
| 5 (Richest) | 19 (54.3) | 20 (52.6) | 42 (77.8) | 33 (68.4) |
| Q1/Q5 | 0.54 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.74 |
| Concentration index | 0.005 | 0.1024 | 0.1260 | 0.0518 |
| P-value | 0.172 | 0.017 | <0.001 | 0.232 |
| Quintile . | Rural* . | Urban* . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Assets . | Expenditure . | Asset . | Expenditure . |
| 1 (Poorest) | 12 (29.3) | 12 (40.0) | 26 (42.6) | 30 (50.8) |
| 2 | 12 (30.0) | 19 (40.4) | 20 (37.7) | 25 (48.1) |
| 3 | 15 (36.5) | 14 (25.9) | 37 (59.7) | 39 (56.5) |
| 4 | 15 (37.5) | 7 (17.2) | 27 (64.3) | 26 (68.4) |
| 5 (Richest) | 19 (54.3) | 20 (52.6) | 42 (77.8) | 33 (68.4) |
| Q1/Q5 | 0.54 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.74 |
| Concentration index | 0.005 | 0.1024 | 0.1260 | 0.0518 |
| P-value | 0.172 | 0.017 | <0.001 | 0.232 |
*The total number of households reporting ownership of a bednet is higher for asset quintiles compared with the expenditure because complete expenditure data for some households were missing (n = 2 rural, 1 urban). Hence, they could not be classified into an SES quintile using expenditure data, but could be using asset data. The differences have no impact on the findings.
| Quintile . | Rural* . | Urban* . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Assets . | Expenditure . | Asset . | Expenditure . |
| 1 (Poorest) | 12 (29.3) | 12 (40.0) | 26 (42.6) | 30 (50.8) |
| 2 | 12 (30.0) | 19 (40.4) | 20 (37.7) | 25 (48.1) |
| 3 | 15 (36.5) | 14 (25.9) | 37 (59.7) | 39 (56.5) |
| 4 | 15 (37.5) | 7 (17.2) | 27 (64.3) | 26 (68.4) |
| 5 (Richest) | 19 (54.3) | 20 (52.6) | 42 (77.8) | 33 (68.4) |
| Q1/Q5 | 0.54 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.74 |
| Concentration index | 0.005 | 0.1024 | 0.1260 | 0.0518 |
| P-value | 0.172 | 0.017 | <0.001 | 0.232 |
| Quintile . | Rural* . | Urban* . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Assets . | Expenditure . | Asset . | Expenditure . |
| 1 (Poorest) | 12 (29.3) | 12 (40.0) | 26 (42.6) | 30 (50.8) |
| 2 | 12 (30.0) | 19 (40.4) | 20 (37.7) | 25 (48.1) |
| 3 | 15 (36.5) | 14 (25.9) | 37 (59.7) | 39 (56.5) |
| 4 | 15 (37.5) | 7 (17.2) | 27 (64.3) | 26 (68.4) |
| 5 (Richest) | 19 (54.3) | 20 (52.6) | 42 (77.8) | 33 (68.4) |
| Q1/Q5 | 0.54 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.74 |
| Concentration index | 0.005 | 0.1024 | 0.1260 | 0.0518 |
| P-value | 0.172 | 0.017 | <0.001 | 0.232 |
*The total number of households reporting ownership of a bednet is higher for asset quintiles compared with the expenditure because complete expenditure data for some households were missing (n = 2 rural, 1 urban). Hence, they could not be classified into an SES quintile using expenditure data, but could be using asset data. The differences have no impact on the findings.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
