Table 1

Studies included in pooled analysis and outcomes. Description of study schema

Study Name Ref. / Particular CharacteristicsTreatment ArmSurvivalnInterval Diagnosis to Post Cycle 6 †# Patients (%) Progression Free Post Cycle 6# Patients Included in the Analysis
6 cy>6 cy
EORTC 26981/ NCIC CE3
[ref. 1, 8]
RT→vsHR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52–0.75), P < .001286N/AN/ANA
TMZ/RT→TMZ287*Median 9.4 mo (IQR: 9.1–9.8)92/287 (32)920
EORTC 26071-CENTRIC. Methylated tumors [3]TMZ/RT → TMZ vsNo difference, HR 1.01273Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.9–9.3)108/273 (40)7731
Cil + TMZ/RT→TMZ272115/272 (42)9619
EMD-CORE. Unmethylated tumors [5]TMZ/RT →TMZ vsRandomized phase II trial. Overall comparable outcome89Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.9–9.3)15/89 (17)132
Cil (2d/wk/) TMZ/ RT→TMZ8823/88 (26)185
Cil (5d/wk/) TMZ/ RT→TMZ8828/88 (32)226
RTOG 0525/ EORTC 26052 [7]TMZ/RT → TMZNo difference, HR 1.03411Median 9.0 mo (IQR: 8.7–9.3)115/411 (28)5110
TMZ/RT → dd TMZ420128/420 (30)10118
Total number of patients enrolled2214Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.8–9.4)624/1928 (32)333291
Study Name Ref. / Particular CharacteristicsTreatment ArmSurvivalnInterval Diagnosis to Post Cycle 6 †# Patients (%) Progression Free Post Cycle 6# Patients Included in the Analysis
6 cy>6 cy
EORTC 26981/ NCIC CE3
[ref. 1, 8]
RT→vsHR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52–0.75), P < .001286N/AN/ANA
TMZ/RT→TMZ287*Median 9.4 mo (IQR: 9.1–9.8)92/287 (32)920
EORTC 26071-CENTRIC. Methylated tumors [3]TMZ/RT → TMZ vsNo difference, HR 1.01273Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.9–9.3)108/273 (40)7731
Cil + TMZ/RT→TMZ272115/272 (42)9619
EMD-CORE. Unmethylated tumors [5]TMZ/RT →TMZ vsRandomized phase II trial. Overall comparable outcome89Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.9–9.3)15/89 (17)132
Cil (2d/wk/) TMZ/ RT→TMZ8823/88 (26)185
Cil (5d/wk/) TMZ/ RT→TMZ8828/88 (32)226
RTOG 0525/ EORTC 26052 [7]TMZ/RT → TMZNo difference, HR 1.03411Median 9.0 mo (IQR: 8.7–9.3)115/411 (28)5110
TMZ/RT → dd TMZ420128/420 (30)10118
Total number of patients enrolled2214Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.8–9.4)624/1928 (32)333291

Abbreviations: Cil, cilengitide; d, day; dd, dose-dense; IQR: Q1-Q3 interquartile range.

* Only the TMZ/RT->TMZ arm was used for pooled data. Both TMZ/RT->TMZ and experimental arms were used for the other 3 trials to maximize the sample size for the analyses, since none of the experimental arms demonstrated significant benefit over TMZ/RT->TMZ.

† Interval diagnosis—post cycle 6: Time interval from initial histological diagnosis (surgery date) until inclusion in current analysis (=day 1 of cycle 6 + 28 days).

Table 1

Studies included in pooled analysis and outcomes. Description of study schema

Study Name Ref. / Particular CharacteristicsTreatment ArmSurvivalnInterval Diagnosis to Post Cycle 6 †# Patients (%) Progression Free Post Cycle 6# Patients Included in the Analysis
6 cy>6 cy
EORTC 26981/ NCIC CE3
[ref. 1, 8]
RT→vsHR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52–0.75), P < .001286N/AN/ANA
TMZ/RT→TMZ287*Median 9.4 mo (IQR: 9.1–9.8)92/287 (32)920
EORTC 26071-CENTRIC. Methylated tumors [3]TMZ/RT → TMZ vsNo difference, HR 1.01273Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.9–9.3)108/273 (40)7731
Cil + TMZ/RT→TMZ272115/272 (42)9619
EMD-CORE. Unmethylated tumors [5]TMZ/RT →TMZ vsRandomized phase II trial. Overall comparable outcome89Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.9–9.3)15/89 (17)132
Cil (2d/wk/) TMZ/ RT→TMZ8823/88 (26)185
Cil (5d/wk/) TMZ/ RT→TMZ8828/88 (32)226
RTOG 0525/ EORTC 26052 [7]TMZ/RT → TMZNo difference, HR 1.03411Median 9.0 mo (IQR: 8.7–9.3)115/411 (28)5110
TMZ/RT → dd TMZ420128/420 (30)10118
Total number of patients enrolled2214Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.8–9.4)624/1928 (32)333291
Study Name Ref. / Particular CharacteristicsTreatment ArmSurvivalnInterval Diagnosis to Post Cycle 6 †# Patients (%) Progression Free Post Cycle 6# Patients Included in the Analysis
6 cy>6 cy
EORTC 26981/ NCIC CE3
[ref. 1, 8]
RT→vsHR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52–0.75), P < .001286N/AN/ANA
TMZ/RT→TMZ287*Median 9.4 mo (IQR: 9.1–9.8)92/287 (32)920
EORTC 26071-CENTRIC. Methylated tumors [3]TMZ/RT → TMZ vsNo difference, HR 1.01273Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.9–9.3)108/273 (40)7731
Cil + TMZ/RT→TMZ272115/272 (42)9619
EMD-CORE. Unmethylated tumors [5]TMZ/RT →TMZ vsRandomized phase II trial. Overall comparable outcome89Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.9–9.3)15/89 (17)132
Cil (2d/wk/) TMZ/ RT→TMZ8823/88 (26)185
Cil (5d/wk/) TMZ/ RT→TMZ8828/88 (32)226
RTOG 0525/ EORTC 26052 [7]TMZ/RT → TMZNo difference, HR 1.03411Median 9.0 mo (IQR: 8.7–9.3)115/411 (28)5110
TMZ/RT → dd TMZ420128/420 (30)10118
Total number of patients enrolled2214Median 9.1 mo (IQR: 8.8–9.4)624/1928 (32)333291

Abbreviations: Cil, cilengitide; d, day; dd, dose-dense; IQR: Q1-Q3 interquartile range.

* Only the TMZ/RT->TMZ arm was used for pooled data. Both TMZ/RT->TMZ and experimental arms were used for the other 3 trials to maximize the sample size for the analyses, since none of the experimental arms demonstrated significant benefit over TMZ/RT->TMZ.

† Interval diagnosis—post cycle 6: Time interval from initial histological diagnosis (surgery date) until inclusion in current analysis (=day 1 of cycle 6 + 28 days).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close