Table A2.

X-ray spectral analysis of the new pn and MOS data.

NameBF modelNHΓN unabs/N absRE gEWF 2-10 keV|$L_{\,{\rm 2-10}\,{\rm keV}}^{\,\mbox{intr}}$|χ2/d.o.f.
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)
XBSJ013240.1−133307aPL+scatt+line3.|$22^{+0.40}_{-0.49}$|1.|$47^{+0.09}_{-0.13}$|0.05 ± 0.026.|$25^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$|108|$^{+80}_{-68}$||$3.81^{+0.28}_{-0.31}$||$4.39^{+0.27}_{-0.29}$|135.8/128
XBSJ113148.7+311358aPL+scatt+refl4.|$05^{+2.39}_{-1.84}$|1.|$59^{+0.39}_{-0.40}$|0.|$07^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$|0.|$98^{+0.02}_{-0.66}$||$1.17^{+1.20}_{-0.60}$||$1.01^{+1.83}_{-0.41}$|14.9/16
XBSJ160645.9+081525aPL+scatt29.|$62^{+9.63}_{-8.01}$|2.|$02^{+0.56}_{-0.52}$|<0.05|$1.77^{+3.84}_{-1.20}$||$5.87^{+12.96}_{-3.98}$|16.6/25
NameBF modelNHΓN unabs/N absRE gEWF 2-10 keV|$L_{\,{\rm 2-10}\,{\rm keV}}^{\,\mbox{intr}}$|χ2/d.o.f.
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)
XBSJ013240.1−133307aPL+scatt+line3.|$22^{+0.40}_{-0.49}$|1.|$47^{+0.09}_{-0.13}$|0.05 ± 0.026.|$25^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$|108|$^{+80}_{-68}$||$3.81^{+0.28}_{-0.31}$||$4.39^{+0.27}_{-0.29}$|135.8/128
XBSJ113148.7+311358aPL+scatt+refl4.|$05^{+2.39}_{-1.84}$|1.|$59^{+0.39}_{-0.40}$|0.|$07^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$|0.|$98^{+0.02}_{-0.66}$||$1.17^{+1.20}_{-0.60}$||$1.01^{+1.83}_{-0.41}$|14.9/16
XBSJ160645.9+081525aPL+scatt29.|$62^{+9.63}_{-8.01}$|2.|$02^{+0.56}_{-0.52}$|<0.05|$1.77^{+3.84}_{-1.20}$||$5.87^{+12.96}_{-3.98}$|16.6/25

Note. Fluxes and luminosities refer to the MOS calibration. Errors are quote at 90 per cent confidence level.

Col. (1): source name in the XBS sample. Col. (2): best-fitting model: aPL = absorbed power law; scatt = scattering component (additional unabsorbed power law with the same photon index as the primary one); refl = neutral Compton reflection (continuum + Fe and Ni lines; the pexmon model in xspec, with the same photon index as the primary power law); line = narrow Gaussian line. Col. (3): intrinsic column density; in units of 1022 cm−2. Col. (4): source photon index. Col. (5): scattering fraction, defined as the ratio of the unabsorbed and the direct power-law normalizations. Col. (6): reflection scaling factor of the pexmon component. Col. (7): line energy. Col. (8): line EW. Col. (9): observed flux (deabsorbed by our Galaxy) in the 2-10 keV energy band, in units of 10−13 ergcm−2s−1. Col. (10): luminosity of the direct component (deabsorbed by intrinsic and Galactic NH) in the 2-10 keV energy band, in units of 1044 ergs−1. Col. (11): χ 2 and number of degree of freedom.

Table A2.

X-ray spectral analysis of the new pn and MOS data.

NameBF modelNHΓN unabs/N absRE gEWF 2-10 keV|$L_{\,{\rm 2-10}\,{\rm keV}}^{\,\mbox{intr}}$|χ2/d.o.f.
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)
XBSJ013240.1−133307aPL+scatt+line3.|$22^{+0.40}_{-0.49}$|1.|$47^{+0.09}_{-0.13}$|0.05 ± 0.026.|$25^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$|108|$^{+80}_{-68}$||$3.81^{+0.28}_{-0.31}$||$4.39^{+0.27}_{-0.29}$|135.8/128
XBSJ113148.7+311358aPL+scatt+refl4.|$05^{+2.39}_{-1.84}$|1.|$59^{+0.39}_{-0.40}$|0.|$07^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$|0.|$98^{+0.02}_{-0.66}$||$1.17^{+1.20}_{-0.60}$||$1.01^{+1.83}_{-0.41}$|14.9/16
XBSJ160645.9+081525aPL+scatt29.|$62^{+9.63}_{-8.01}$|2.|$02^{+0.56}_{-0.52}$|<0.05|$1.77^{+3.84}_{-1.20}$||$5.87^{+12.96}_{-3.98}$|16.6/25
NameBF modelNHΓN unabs/N absRE gEWF 2-10 keV|$L_{\,{\rm 2-10}\,{\rm keV}}^{\,\mbox{intr}}$|χ2/d.o.f.
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)
XBSJ013240.1−133307aPL+scatt+line3.|$22^{+0.40}_{-0.49}$|1.|$47^{+0.09}_{-0.13}$|0.05 ± 0.026.|$25^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$|108|$^{+80}_{-68}$||$3.81^{+0.28}_{-0.31}$||$4.39^{+0.27}_{-0.29}$|135.8/128
XBSJ113148.7+311358aPL+scatt+refl4.|$05^{+2.39}_{-1.84}$|1.|$59^{+0.39}_{-0.40}$|0.|$07^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$|0.|$98^{+0.02}_{-0.66}$||$1.17^{+1.20}_{-0.60}$||$1.01^{+1.83}_{-0.41}$|14.9/16
XBSJ160645.9+081525aPL+scatt29.|$62^{+9.63}_{-8.01}$|2.|$02^{+0.56}_{-0.52}$|<0.05|$1.77^{+3.84}_{-1.20}$||$5.87^{+12.96}_{-3.98}$|16.6/25

Note. Fluxes and luminosities refer to the MOS calibration. Errors are quote at 90 per cent confidence level.

Col. (1): source name in the XBS sample. Col. (2): best-fitting model: aPL = absorbed power law; scatt = scattering component (additional unabsorbed power law with the same photon index as the primary one); refl = neutral Compton reflection (continuum + Fe and Ni lines; the pexmon model in xspec, with the same photon index as the primary power law); line = narrow Gaussian line. Col. (3): intrinsic column density; in units of 1022 cm−2. Col. (4): source photon index. Col. (5): scattering fraction, defined as the ratio of the unabsorbed and the direct power-law normalizations. Col. (6): reflection scaling factor of the pexmon component. Col. (7): line energy. Col. (8): line EW. Col. (9): observed flux (deabsorbed by our Galaxy) in the 2-10 keV energy band, in units of 10−13 ergcm−2s−1. Col. (10): luminosity of the direct component (deabsorbed by intrinsic and Galactic NH) in the 2-10 keV energy band, in units of 1044 ergs−1. Col. (11): χ 2 and number of degree of freedom.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close