Table 3.

Best-fitting parameters of the warm absorbers (wa1, wa2) and photoionized emission (em) for the RGS spectra. For all these models, ξ is the ionization parameter, σv is the turbulent velocity, NH is the column density and v is the velocity shift with respect to the systemic velocity of NGC 4593; |$N_{\small {em}}$| is the normalization of the photoionized emission table.

|$\log \xi _{\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (erg s−1 cm)2.22 ± 0.01
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (km s−1)1.72 ± 0.07
|$\log N_{\rm{H,}\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (cm−2)|$21.83 ^{+ 0.07 }_{- 0.02 }$|
|$v_{\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (km s−1)−870 ± 60
|$\log \xi _{\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (erg s−1 cm)0.43 ± 0.08
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (km s−1)Unconstr.
|$\log N_{\rm{H,}\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (cm−2)20.90 ± 0.02
|$v_{\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (km s−1)−300 ± 200
|$\log \xi _{\small {em}}$| (erg s−1 cm)0.56 ± 0.03
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {em}}$| (km s−1)Unconstr.
|$\log N_{\rm{H},\small {em}}$| (cm−2)>21.4
|$v_{\small {em}}$| (km s−1)−720 ± 60
|$N_{\small {em}}$| (×10−18)6 ± 1
|$\log \xi _{\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (erg s−1 cm)2.22 ± 0.01
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (km s−1)1.72 ± 0.07
|$\log N_{\rm{H,}\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (cm−2)|$21.83 ^{+ 0.07 }_{- 0.02 }$|
|$v_{\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (km s−1)−870 ± 60
|$\log \xi _{\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (erg s−1 cm)0.43 ± 0.08
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (km s−1)Unconstr.
|$\log N_{\rm{H,}\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (cm−2)20.90 ± 0.02
|$v_{\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (km s−1)−300 ± 200
|$\log \xi _{\small {em}}$| (erg s−1 cm)0.56 ± 0.03
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {em}}$| (km s−1)Unconstr.
|$\log N_{\rm{H},\small {em}}$| (cm−2)>21.4
|$v_{\small {em}}$| (km s−1)−720 ± 60
|$N_{\small {em}}$| (×10−18)6 ± 1
Table 3.

Best-fitting parameters of the warm absorbers (wa1, wa2) and photoionized emission (em) for the RGS spectra. For all these models, ξ is the ionization parameter, σv is the turbulent velocity, NH is the column density and v is the velocity shift with respect to the systemic velocity of NGC 4593; |$N_{\small {em}}$| is the normalization of the photoionized emission table.

|$\log \xi _{\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (erg s−1 cm)2.22 ± 0.01
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (km s−1)1.72 ± 0.07
|$\log N_{\rm{H,}\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (cm−2)|$21.83 ^{+ 0.07 }_{- 0.02 }$|
|$v_{\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (km s−1)−870 ± 60
|$\log \xi _{\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (erg s−1 cm)0.43 ± 0.08
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (km s−1)Unconstr.
|$\log N_{\rm{H,}\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (cm−2)20.90 ± 0.02
|$v_{\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (km s−1)−300 ± 200
|$\log \xi _{\small {em}}$| (erg s−1 cm)0.56 ± 0.03
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {em}}$| (km s−1)Unconstr.
|$\log N_{\rm{H},\small {em}}$| (cm−2)>21.4
|$v_{\small {em}}$| (km s−1)−720 ± 60
|$N_{\small {em}}$| (×10−18)6 ± 1
|$\log \xi _{\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (erg s−1 cm)2.22 ± 0.01
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (km s−1)1.72 ± 0.07
|$\log N_{\rm{H,}\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (cm−2)|$21.83 ^{+ 0.07 }_{- 0.02 }$|
|$v_{\small {WA}{{1}}}$| (km s−1)−870 ± 60
|$\log \xi _{\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (erg s−1 cm)0.43 ± 0.08
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (km s−1)Unconstr.
|$\log N_{\rm{H,}\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (cm−2)20.90 ± 0.02
|$v_{\small {WA}{{2}}}$| (km s−1)−300 ± 200
|$\log \xi _{\small {em}}$| (erg s−1 cm)0.56 ± 0.03
|$\log \sigma _{v,\small {em}}$| (km s−1)Unconstr.
|$\log N_{\rm{H},\small {em}}$| (cm−2)>21.4
|$v_{\small {em}}$| (km s−1)−720 ± 60
|$N_{\small {em}}$| (×10−18)6 ± 1
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close