3
Open in new tab

Origin and phylogenic analysis of CWS-degrading strains isolated from seven human faecal samples according to the methane status

SubjectsMethane statusCWS-degrading population levelStrainBacterial species (%16S rRNA gene sequence similarity)
ECH4−8.5CRE27Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (100%)
GCH4−6.935AE31Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (99%)
35AE37Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
35AE34Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
35AE35Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
ICH4−7.631S15Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
31S18Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
KCH4+8.17SE20Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
MCH4+9.58SE23Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
8SE26Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
NCH4+7.99SE51Ruminococcus sp. nov. (98%)
OCH4+9.511SE37Roseburia faecis (99%)
11SE38Roseburia faecis (99%)
11SE39Roseburia faecis (99%)
SubjectsMethane statusCWS-degrading population levelStrainBacterial species (%16S rRNA gene sequence similarity)
ECH4−8.5CRE27Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (100%)
GCH4−6.935AE31Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (99%)
35AE37Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
35AE34Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
35AE35Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
ICH4−7.631S15Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
31S18Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
KCH4+8.17SE20Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
MCH4+9.58SE23Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
8SE26Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
NCH4+7.99SE51Ruminococcus sp. nov. (98%)
OCH4+9.511SE37Roseburia faecis (99%)
11SE38Roseburia faecis (99%)
11SE39Roseburia faecis (99%)
*

The population level is expressed as log N g−1 faeces.

†

Robert et al. (2007).

‡

Robert & Bernalier-Donadille (2003).

3
Open in new tab

Origin and phylogenic analysis of CWS-degrading strains isolated from seven human faecal samples according to the methane status

SubjectsMethane statusCWS-degrading population levelStrainBacterial species (%16S rRNA gene sequence similarity)
ECH4−8.5CRE27Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (100%)
GCH4−6.935AE31Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (99%)
35AE37Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
35AE34Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
35AE35Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
ICH4−7.631S15Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
31S18Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
KCH4+8.17SE20Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
MCH4+9.58SE23Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
8SE26Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
NCH4+7.99SE51Ruminococcus sp. nov. (98%)
OCH4+9.511SE37Roseburia faecis (99%)
11SE38Roseburia faecis (99%)
11SE39Roseburia faecis (99%)
SubjectsMethane statusCWS-degrading population levelStrainBacterial species (%16S rRNA gene sequence similarity)
ECH4−8.5CRE27Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (100%)
GCH4−6.935AE31Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (99%)
35AE37Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
35AE34Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
35AE35Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
ICH4−7.631S15Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
31S18Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (98%)
KCH4+8.17SE20Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
MCH4+9.58SE23Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
8SE26Enterococcus faecalis (99%)
NCH4+7.99SE51Ruminococcus sp. nov. (98%)
OCH4+9.511SE37Roseburia faecis (99%)
11SE38Roseburia faecis (99%)
11SE39Roseburia faecis (99%)
*

The population level is expressed as log N g−1 faeces.

†

Robert et al. (2007).

‡

Robert & Bernalier-Donadille (2003).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close