Rates of O2 and NO−2 uptake by large type CANON aggregates at different experimental conditions
Experimental condition | Bulk O2 (μM) | Bulk NO−2 (μM) | O2 uptake (μmol cm−2 s−1) | NO−2 uptake (μmol cm−2 s−1) |
Low O2 (Fig. 4(a)) | 2 | 30 | 2.35 × 10−6 | 2.16 × 10−5 |
High O2 (Fig. 4(b)) | 9 | 30 | 1.28 × 10−5 | 2.33 × 10−5 |
High NO−2 (Fig. 4(c)) | 12 | 100 | 1.64 × 10−5 | 4.13 × 10−5 |
Low flow (Fig. 4(d)) | 10 | 30 | 1.07 × 10−5 | 1.41 × 10−5 |
Experimental condition | Bulk O2 (μM) | Bulk NO−2 (μM) | O2 uptake (μmol cm−2 s−1) | NO−2 uptake (μmol cm−2 s−1) |
Low O2 (Fig. 4(a)) | 2 | 30 | 2.35 × 10−6 | 2.16 × 10−5 |
High O2 (Fig. 4(b)) | 9 | 30 | 1.28 × 10−5 | 2.33 × 10−5 |
High NO−2 (Fig. 4(c)) | 12 | 100 | 1.64 × 10−5 | 4.13 × 10−5 |
Low flow (Fig. 4(d)) | 10 | 30 | 1.07 × 10−5 | 1.41 × 10−5 |
Uptake rates were calculated from concentration gradients in the diffusive boundary layer.
Rates of O2 and NO−2 uptake by large type CANON aggregates at different experimental conditions
Experimental condition | Bulk O2 (μM) | Bulk NO−2 (μM) | O2 uptake (μmol cm−2 s−1) | NO−2 uptake (μmol cm−2 s−1) |
Low O2 (Fig. 4(a)) | 2 | 30 | 2.35 × 10−6 | 2.16 × 10−5 |
High O2 (Fig. 4(b)) | 9 | 30 | 1.28 × 10−5 | 2.33 × 10−5 |
High NO−2 (Fig. 4(c)) | 12 | 100 | 1.64 × 10−5 | 4.13 × 10−5 |
Low flow (Fig. 4(d)) | 10 | 30 | 1.07 × 10−5 | 1.41 × 10−5 |
Experimental condition | Bulk O2 (μM) | Bulk NO−2 (μM) | O2 uptake (μmol cm−2 s−1) | NO−2 uptake (μmol cm−2 s−1) |
Low O2 (Fig. 4(a)) | 2 | 30 | 2.35 × 10−6 | 2.16 × 10−5 |
High O2 (Fig. 4(b)) | 9 | 30 | 1.28 × 10−5 | 2.33 × 10−5 |
High NO−2 (Fig. 4(c)) | 12 | 100 | 1.64 × 10−5 | 4.13 × 10−5 |
Low flow (Fig. 4(d)) | 10 | 30 | 1.07 × 10−5 | 1.41 × 10−5 |
Uptake rates were calculated from concentration gradients in the diffusive boundary layer.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.