2

PAH loss (percentage) after 4 weeks of incubation in non-sterile soilsa

PAHsROG soilPER soil
Biotic controlInoculated treatmentStatistical testBiotic controlInoculated treatmentStatistical test
2–3 Ring PAHs0 ± 3b35 ± 3Sc8 ± 212 ± 3NS
4 Ring PAHs0 ± 222 ± 4S14 ± 419 ± 2NS
5–6 Ring PAHs2 ± 328 ± 4S12 ± 327 ± 4S
Total PAHs126S1321S
PAHsROG soilPER soil
Biotic controlInoculated treatmentStatistical testBiotic controlInoculated treatmentStatistical test
2–3 Ring PAHs0 ± 3b35 ± 3Sc8 ± 212 ± 3NS
4 Ring PAHs0 ± 222 ± 4S14 ± 419 ± 2NS
5–6 Ring PAHs2 ± 328 ± 4S12 ± 327 ± 4S
Total PAHs126S1321S
a

Calculated according to formula detailed in Section 2.

b

Mean ± SE (n = 3).

c

Statistical analysis was performed by a two sample t-test comparing inoculated treatment with biotic control (P = 0.01). S, significantly different; NS, not significantly different.

2

PAH loss (percentage) after 4 weeks of incubation in non-sterile soilsa

PAHsROG soilPER soil
Biotic controlInoculated treatmentStatistical testBiotic controlInoculated treatmentStatistical test
2–3 Ring PAHs0 ± 3b35 ± 3Sc8 ± 212 ± 3NS
4 Ring PAHs0 ± 222 ± 4S14 ± 419 ± 2NS
5–6 Ring PAHs2 ± 328 ± 4S12 ± 327 ± 4S
Total PAHs126S1321S
PAHsROG soilPER soil
Biotic controlInoculated treatmentStatistical testBiotic controlInoculated treatmentStatistical test
2–3 Ring PAHs0 ± 3b35 ± 3Sc8 ± 212 ± 3NS
4 Ring PAHs0 ± 222 ± 4S14 ± 419 ± 2NS
5–6 Ring PAHs2 ± 328 ± 4S12 ± 327 ± 4S
Total PAHs126S1321S
a

Calculated according to formula detailed in Section 2.

b

Mean ± SE (n = 3).

c

Statistical analysis was performed by a two sample t-test comparing inoculated treatment with biotic control (P = 0.01). S, significantly different; NS, not significantly different.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close