Table 1.

Sirius cultivar parameters with the value ranges used in ideotype optimization, from Semenov et al. (2014)

(1) Using a model of canopy photosynthesis, it was shown that 10% in L could be achieved if λ (Rubisco specificity factor) was optimized (Zhu et al., 2010). (2) Genetic variations of Ph up to 20% were observed for wheat (Mossad et al., 1995; M. Ishag et al., 1998). (3) Varietal difference in number of days till heading under long and short day conditions varied between 9.74 and 107.40 in a photoperiodic response experiment (Košner and Žurková, 1996). (4) Genetic variation of Gf up to 40% was observed for wheat (Robert et al., 2001; Charmet et al., 2005; Akkaya et al., 2006). (5) The reported range of genetic variation for flag leaf area under unlimited water and nitrogen was up to 40% (Fischer et al., 1998; Shearman et al., 2005). (6) Large genotypic variation in root characteristics and water uptake was reported (Asseng et al., 1998; Manschadi et al., 2006).

ParameterSymbolRange
Photosynthesis
Light conversion efficiencyL1.10 (dimensionless)(1)
Phenology
PhyllochronPh70–130 (°Cd)(2)
Day length responsePp0.05–0.70 (leaf h–1 day length)(3)
Duration of grain fillingGf500–900 (°Cd)(4)
Canopy
Maximum area of flag leafA0.003–0.01 (m2 leaf m–2 soil)(5)
‘Stay green’S0–1.5 (dimensionless)
Drought tolerance
Response of photosynthesis to water stressWsa0.1–0.21 (dimensionless)
Maximum acceleration of leaf senescence caused by water deficiencyWss1.2–1.9 (dimensionless)
Root water uptake
Rate of water uptakeRu1–7%(6)
ParameterSymbolRange
Photosynthesis
Light conversion efficiencyL1.10 (dimensionless)(1)
Phenology
PhyllochronPh70–130 (°Cd)(2)
Day length responsePp0.05–0.70 (leaf h–1 day length)(3)
Duration of grain fillingGf500–900 (°Cd)(4)
Canopy
Maximum area of flag leafA0.003–0.01 (m2 leaf m–2 soil)(5)
‘Stay green’S0–1.5 (dimensionless)
Drought tolerance
Response of photosynthesis to water stressWsa0.1–0.21 (dimensionless)
Maximum acceleration of leaf senescence caused by water deficiencyWss1.2–1.9 (dimensionless)
Root water uptake
Rate of water uptakeRu1–7%(6)
Table 1.

Sirius cultivar parameters with the value ranges used in ideotype optimization, from Semenov et al. (2014)

(1) Using a model of canopy photosynthesis, it was shown that 10% in L could be achieved if λ (Rubisco specificity factor) was optimized (Zhu et al., 2010). (2) Genetic variations of Ph up to 20% were observed for wheat (Mossad et al., 1995; M. Ishag et al., 1998). (3) Varietal difference in number of days till heading under long and short day conditions varied between 9.74 and 107.40 in a photoperiodic response experiment (Košner and Žurková, 1996). (4) Genetic variation of Gf up to 40% was observed for wheat (Robert et al., 2001; Charmet et al., 2005; Akkaya et al., 2006). (5) The reported range of genetic variation for flag leaf area under unlimited water and nitrogen was up to 40% (Fischer et al., 1998; Shearman et al., 2005). (6) Large genotypic variation in root characteristics and water uptake was reported (Asseng et al., 1998; Manschadi et al., 2006).

ParameterSymbolRange
Photosynthesis
Light conversion efficiencyL1.10 (dimensionless)(1)
Phenology
PhyllochronPh70–130 (°Cd)(2)
Day length responsePp0.05–0.70 (leaf h–1 day length)(3)
Duration of grain fillingGf500–900 (°Cd)(4)
Canopy
Maximum area of flag leafA0.003–0.01 (m2 leaf m–2 soil)(5)
‘Stay green’S0–1.5 (dimensionless)
Drought tolerance
Response of photosynthesis to water stressWsa0.1–0.21 (dimensionless)
Maximum acceleration of leaf senescence caused by water deficiencyWss1.2–1.9 (dimensionless)
Root water uptake
Rate of water uptakeRu1–7%(6)
ParameterSymbolRange
Photosynthesis
Light conversion efficiencyL1.10 (dimensionless)(1)
Phenology
PhyllochronPh70–130 (°Cd)(2)
Day length responsePp0.05–0.70 (leaf h–1 day length)(3)
Duration of grain fillingGf500–900 (°Cd)(4)
Canopy
Maximum area of flag leafA0.003–0.01 (m2 leaf m–2 soil)(5)
‘Stay green’S0–1.5 (dimensionless)
Drought tolerance
Response of photosynthesis to water stressWsa0.1–0.21 (dimensionless)
Maximum acceleration of leaf senescence caused by water deficiencyWss1.2–1.9 (dimensionless)
Root water uptake
Rate of water uptakeRu1–7%(6)
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close