Anti-Orthopoxvirus IgG and IgM Results for Serum Samples from the Patient and 4 Contactsa
Person . | Smallpox vaccination . | IgM Valueb . | IgM Interpretation . | IgG Valueb . | IgG interpretation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | Unlikelyc | 0.091 | Positive | 0.183 | Positive |
Patient’s partner (household contact) | Yes | −0.024 | Negative | 0.426 | Positive |
Patient’s older child (household contact) | No | 0.032 | Equivocald | −0.201 | Negative |
Patient’s younger child (household contact) | No | −0.020 | Negative | −0.194 | Negative |
Patient’s friend (social contact) | Yes | −0.034 | Negative | 0.483 | Positive |
Person . | Smallpox vaccination . | IgM Valueb . | IgM Interpretation . | IgG Valueb . | IgG interpretation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | Unlikelyc | 0.091 | Positive | 0.183 | Positive |
Patient’s partner (household contact) | Yes | −0.024 | Negative | 0.426 | Positive |
Patient’s older child (household contact) | No | 0.032 | Equivocald | −0.201 | Negative |
Patient’s younger child (household contact) | No | −0.020 | Negative | −0.194 | Negative |
Patient’s friend (social contact) | Yes | −0.034 | Negative | 0.483 | Positive |
Abbreviation: Ig, immunoglobulin.
aSerology was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
bSerum optical density (OD) cutoff values (OD value − 3 standard deviations of negative control) at 1:50 and 1:100 dilutions were considered positive for IgM and IgG, respectively.
cThe patient did not recall being vaccinated and did not have a vaccination scar.
dThe sample from the patient’s older child was positive for anti-Orthopoxvirus IgM, but because this value was low and the corresponding anti-Orthopoxvirus IgG result was negative, the result was interpreted as equivocal.
Anti-Orthopoxvirus IgG and IgM Results for Serum Samples from the Patient and 4 Contactsa
Person . | Smallpox vaccination . | IgM Valueb . | IgM Interpretation . | IgG Valueb . | IgG interpretation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | Unlikelyc | 0.091 | Positive | 0.183 | Positive |
Patient’s partner (household contact) | Yes | −0.024 | Negative | 0.426 | Positive |
Patient’s older child (household contact) | No | 0.032 | Equivocald | −0.201 | Negative |
Patient’s younger child (household contact) | No | −0.020 | Negative | −0.194 | Negative |
Patient’s friend (social contact) | Yes | −0.034 | Negative | 0.483 | Positive |
Person . | Smallpox vaccination . | IgM Valueb . | IgM Interpretation . | IgG Valueb . | IgG interpretation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | Unlikelyc | 0.091 | Positive | 0.183 | Positive |
Patient’s partner (household contact) | Yes | −0.024 | Negative | 0.426 | Positive |
Patient’s older child (household contact) | No | 0.032 | Equivocald | −0.201 | Negative |
Patient’s younger child (household contact) | No | −0.020 | Negative | −0.194 | Negative |
Patient’s friend (social contact) | Yes | −0.034 | Negative | 0.483 | Positive |
Abbreviation: Ig, immunoglobulin.
aSerology was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
bSerum optical density (OD) cutoff values (OD value − 3 standard deviations of negative control) at 1:50 and 1:100 dilutions were considered positive for IgM and IgG, respectively.
cThe patient did not recall being vaccinated and did not have a vaccination scar.
dThe sample from the patient’s older child was positive for anti-Orthopoxvirus IgM, but because this value was low and the corresponding anti-Orthopoxvirus IgG result was negative, the result was interpreted as equivocal.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.