Table 1

Sample selection and follow-up length

 MONICA
HAPIEE
CZPL-WPL-TLTRUCZPL-KRU
Baseline, year (response rate, %)1992 (65)1983–84 (74), 1988–89 (70)1983–84 (82), 1987–88 (73)1983–85 (70), 1986–87 (70), 1992–93 (59)1985–86 (72), 1988–89 (73), 1994–95 (72)2002–05 (55)2002–05 (61)2002–05 (61)
Recruited, n32734079403359689835885610 7289363
Within the study age range, n19773396327445966062878110 7289352
No pre-existing CVD, n18612437278238065669763383167316
No missing SCORE values, n13402404272933015253601872097290
Median follow-up (interquartile range), years10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)6.2 (5.8–6.9)5.1 (4.9–5.8)4.6 (3.9–5.1)
 MONICA
HAPIEE
CZPL-WPL-TLTRUCZPL-KRU
Baseline, year (response rate, %)1992 (65)1983–84 (74), 1988–89 (70)1983–84 (82), 1987–88 (73)1983–85 (70), 1986–87 (70), 1992–93 (59)1985–86 (72), 1988–89 (73), 1994–95 (72)2002–05 (55)2002–05 (61)2002–05 (61)
Recruited, n32734079403359689835885610 7289363
Within the study age range, n19773396327445966062878110 7289352
No pre-existing CVD, n18612437278238065669763383167316
No missing SCORE values, n13402404272933015253601872097290
Median follow-up (interquartile range), years10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)6.2 (5.8–6.9)5.1 (4.9–5.8)4.6 (3.9–5.1)

CZ, Czech Republic; LT, Lithuania; PL-K, Poland (Krakow); PL-T, Poland (Tarnobrzeg); PL-W, Poland (Warsaw); RU, Russia.

Table 1

Sample selection and follow-up length

 MONICA
HAPIEE
CZPL-WPL-TLTRUCZPL-KRU
Baseline, year (response rate, %)1992 (65)1983–84 (74), 1988–89 (70)1983–84 (82), 1987–88 (73)1983–85 (70), 1986–87 (70), 1992–93 (59)1985–86 (72), 1988–89 (73), 1994–95 (72)2002–05 (55)2002–05 (61)2002–05 (61)
Recruited, n32734079403359689835885610 7289363
Within the study age range, n19773396327445966062878110 7289352
No pre-existing CVD, n18612437278238065669763383167316
No missing SCORE values, n13402404272933015253601872097290
Median follow-up (interquartile range), years10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)6.2 (5.8–6.9)5.1 (4.9–5.8)4.6 (3.9–5.1)
 MONICA
HAPIEE
CZPL-WPL-TLTRUCZPL-KRU
Baseline, year (response rate, %)1992 (65)1983–84 (74), 1988–89 (70)1983–84 (82), 1987–88 (73)1983–85 (70), 1986–87 (70), 1992–93 (59)1985–86 (72), 1988–89 (73), 1994–95 (72)2002–05 (55)2002–05 (61)2002–05 (61)
Recruited, n32734079403359689835885610 7289363
Within the study age range, n19773396327445966062878110 7289352
No pre-existing CVD, n18612437278238065669763383167316
No missing SCORE values, n13402404272933015253601872097290
Median follow-up (interquartile range), years10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)10.0 (10.0–10.0)6.2 (5.8–6.9)5.1 (4.9–5.8)4.6 (3.9–5.1)

CZ, Czech Republic; LT, Lithuania; PL-K, Poland (Krakow); PL-T, Poland (Tarnobrzeg); PL-W, Poland (Warsaw); RU, Russia.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close