Table 2.

Characteristics of Participants at Time of Cortisol Assessment (2002–2004) by Glucose Status at Phase 11 (2012–2013)

NNormoglycemic (n = 2542)IFG (n = 518)Incident Diabetes (n = 210)Pa
Mean age (sd)327060.94 ± 5.9060.13 ± 5.7261.45 ± 6.03.005
Gender (% men)32701862 (73.2%)433 (83.6%)160 (76.2%).001
Smoker (% yes)3268172 (6.8%)25 (4.8%)15 (7.1%).433
Employment grade (% lowest)3261189 (7.4%)20 (3.9%)28 (13.5%).001
Mean BMI (sd)325726. 18 ± 4.1327.16 ± 3.7629.18 ± 4.74.001
Cardiovascular medication (% yes)3270626 (24.6%)146 (28.2%)89 (42.4%).001
History of CHD (% yes)3169299 (12.1%)62 (12.4%)46 (22.9%).001
Waking cortisol (nmol/liter)327015.99 ± 7.215.19 ± 7.0715.41 ± 7.07.066
CAR (nmol/liter)32707.35 ± 10.98.65 ± 11.317.04 ± 10.61.102
Slope across the day (nmol/liter per h)b3270−0.1304 ± 0.022−0.1288 ± 0.022−0.1274 ± 0.023.083
Bedtime cortisol (nmol/liter)32702.33 ± 3.032.36 ± 2.832.42 ± 2.07.895
NNormoglycemic (n = 2542)IFG (n = 518)Incident Diabetes (n = 210)Pa
Mean age (sd)327060.94 ± 5.9060.13 ± 5.7261.45 ± 6.03.005
Gender (% men)32701862 (73.2%)433 (83.6%)160 (76.2%).001
Smoker (% yes)3268172 (6.8%)25 (4.8%)15 (7.1%).433
Employment grade (% lowest)3261189 (7.4%)20 (3.9%)28 (13.5%).001
Mean BMI (sd)325726. 18 ± 4.1327.16 ± 3.7629.18 ± 4.74.001
Cardiovascular medication (% yes)3270626 (24.6%)146 (28.2%)89 (42.4%).001
History of CHD (% yes)3169299 (12.1%)62 (12.4%)46 (22.9%).001
Waking cortisol (nmol/liter)327015.99 ± 7.215.19 ± 7.0715.41 ± 7.07.066
CAR (nmol/liter)32707.35 ± 10.98.65 ± 11.317.04 ± 10.61.102
Slope across the day (nmol/liter per h)b3270−0.1304 ± 0.022−0.1288 ± 0.022−0.1274 ± 0.023.083
Bedtime cortisol (nmol/liter)32702.33 ± 3.032.36 ± 2.832.42 ± 2.07.895

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAR, cortisol awakening response; CHD, coronary heart disease; IFG, impaired fasting glucose.

Means ± sd and N (%). Bold typeface indicates a statistically significant difference.

a

P values refer to an overall comparison of the three groups.

b

To calculate the slope, cortisol values were log-transformed

Table 2.

Characteristics of Participants at Time of Cortisol Assessment (2002–2004) by Glucose Status at Phase 11 (2012–2013)

NNormoglycemic (n = 2542)IFG (n = 518)Incident Diabetes (n = 210)Pa
Mean age (sd)327060.94 ± 5.9060.13 ± 5.7261.45 ± 6.03.005
Gender (% men)32701862 (73.2%)433 (83.6%)160 (76.2%).001
Smoker (% yes)3268172 (6.8%)25 (4.8%)15 (7.1%).433
Employment grade (% lowest)3261189 (7.4%)20 (3.9%)28 (13.5%).001
Mean BMI (sd)325726. 18 ± 4.1327.16 ± 3.7629.18 ± 4.74.001
Cardiovascular medication (% yes)3270626 (24.6%)146 (28.2%)89 (42.4%).001
History of CHD (% yes)3169299 (12.1%)62 (12.4%)46 (22.9%).001
Waking cortisol (nmol/liter)327015.99 ± 7.215.19 ± 7.0715.41 ± 7.07.066
CAR (nmol/liter)32707.35 ± 10.98.65 ± 11.317.04 ± 10.61.102
Slope across the day (nmol/liter per h)b3270−0.1304 ± 0.022−0.1288 ± 0.022−0.1274 ± 0.023.083
Bedtime cortisol (nmol/liter)32702.33 ± 3.032.36 ± 2.832.42 ± 2.07.895
NNormoglycemic (n = 2542)IFG (n = 518)Incident Diabetes (n = 210)Pa
Mean age (sd)327060.94 ± 5.9060.13 ± 5.7261.45 ± 6.03.005
Gender (% men)32701862 (73.2%)433 (83.6%)160 (76.2%).001
Smoker (% yes)3268172 (6.8%)25 (4.8%)15 (7.1%).433
Employment grade (% lowest)3261189 (7.4%)20 (3.9%)28 (13.5%).001
Mean BMI (sd)325726. 18 ± 4.1327.16 ± 3.7629.18 ± 4.74.001
Cardiovascular medication (% yes)3270626 (24.6%)146 (28.2%)89 (42.4%).001
History of CHD (% yes)3169299 (12.1%)62 (12.4%)46 (22.9%).001
Waking cortisol (nmol/liter)327015.99 ± 7.215.19 ± 7.0715.41 ± 7.07.066
CAR (nmol/liter)32707.35 ± 10.98.65 ± 11.317.04 ± 10.61.102
Slope across the day (nmol/liter per h)b3270−0.1304 ± 0.022−0.1288 ± 0.022−0.1274 ± 0.023.083
Bedtime cortisol (nmol/liter)32702.33 ± 3.032.36 ± 2.832.42 ± 2.07.895

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAR, cortisol awakening response; CHD, coronary heart disease; IFG, impaired fasting glucose.

Means ± sd and N (%). Bold typeface indicates a statistically significant difference.

a

P values refer to an overall comparison of the three groups.

b

To calculate the slope, cortisol values were log-transformed

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close