Table 2

TFs Controlling Chemosensory Neuron Differentiation Exhibit Higher Levels of Radical Nonsynonymous/Synonymous (dR/dS) and Conservative Nonsynonymous/Synonymous (dC/dS) Rate Ratios Than Structural Chemosensory Genes

dR/dS
dC/dS
Chemical ClassificationTFStructuralTFStructural
Charge0.0471 ± 0.0060.0325 ± 0.003*0.1084 ± 0.0080.0586 ± 0.005***
Polarity0.0793 ± 0.0070.0361 ± 0.004***0.0849 ± 0.0070.0554 ± 0.004***
Volume & polarity0.0587 ± 0.0050.0360 ± 0.003***0.1347 ± 0.0110.0748 ± 0.006***
Charge &aromatic0.0498 ± 0.0050.0369 ± 0.003*0.1209 ± 0.0100.0619 ± 0.005***
Charge & polarity0.0635 ± 0.0060.0359 ± 0.003***0.1193 ± 0.0090.0677 ± 0.005***
dR/dS
dC/dS
Chemical ClassificationTFStructuralTFStructural
Charge0.0471 ± 0.0060.0325 ± 0.003*0.1084 ± 0.0080.0586 ± 0.005***
Polarity0.0793 ± 0.0070.0361 ± 0.004***0.0849 ± 0.0070.0554 ± 0.004***
Volume & polarity0.0587 ± 0.0050.0360 ± 0.003***0.1347 ± 0.0110.0748 ± 0.006***
Charge &aromatic0.0498 ± 0.0050.0369 ± 0.003*0.1209 ± 0.0100.0619 ± 0.005***
Charge & polarity0.0635 ± 0.0060.0359 ± 0.003***0.1193 ± 0.0090.0677 ± 0.005***

NOTE.—Mean ± 1 standard error. Significance is obtained from a nonparametric Wilcoxon two-sample test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. The list of TFs used in this analysis is reported in supplementary table 3, Supplementary Material online.

The radical and conservative amino acid changes are based on five amino acid chemical classifications. Caenorhabditis remanei and Caenorhabditis briggsae were used to compute divergence.

Table 2

TFs Controlling Chemosensory Neuron Differentiation Exhibit Higher Levels of Radical Nonsynonymous/Synonymous (dR/dS) and Conservative Nonsynonymous/Synonymous (dC/dS) Rate Ratios Than Structural Chemosensory Genes

dR/dS
dC/dS
Chemical ClassificationTFStructuralTFStructural
Charge0.0471 ± 0.0060.0325 ± 0.003*0.1084 ± 0.0080.0586 ± 0.005***
Polarity0.0793 ± 0.0070.0361 ± 0.004***0.0849 ± 0.0070.0554 ± 0.004***
Volume & polarity0.0587 ± 0.0050.0360 ± 0.003***0.1347 ± 0.0110.0748 ± 0.006***
Charge &aromatic0.0498 ± 0.0050.0369 ± 0.003*0.1209 ± 0.0100.0619 ± 0.005***
Charge & polarity0.0635 ± 0.0060.0359 ± 0.003***0.1193 ± 0.0090.0677 ± 0.005***
dR/dS
dC/dS
Chemical ClassificationTFStructuralTFStructural
Charge0.0471 ± 0.0060.0325 ± 0.003*0.1084 ± 0.0080.0586 ± 0.005***
Polarity0.0793 ± 0.0070.0361 ± 0.004***0.0849 ± 0.0070.0554 ± 0.004***
Volume & polarity0.0587 ± 0.0050.0360 ± 0.003***0.1347 ± 0.0110.0748 ± 0.006***
Charge &aromatic0.0498 ± 0.0050.0369 ± 0.003*0.1209 ± 0.0100.0619 ± 0.005***
Charge & polarity0.0635 ± 0.0060.0359 ± 0.003***0.1193 ± 0.0090.0677 ± 0.005***

NOTE.—Mean ± 1 standard error. Significance is obtained from a nonparametric Wilcoxon two-sample test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. The list of TFs used in this analysis is reported in supplementary table 3, Supplementary Material online.

The radical and conservative amino acid changes are based on five amino acid chemical classifications. Caenorhabditis remanei and Caenorhabditis briggsae were used to compute divergence.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close