Table 3:

Robust multiple regression model using the Huber's method

VariableCoefficientStandard errorP
ASA score 30.49970.17220.032
 Fluid duration0.00000.00190.98
 Hx of MI−0.00970.03150.75
Presence of mitral valve dysfunction0.48920.17340.050
 N+ stage0.01120.01960.83
 Time for node resection0.00010.00220.95
VariableCoefficientStandard errorP
ASA score 30.49970.17220.032
 Fluid duration0.00000.00190.98
 Hx of MI−0.00970.03150.75
Presence of mitral valve dysfunction0.48920.17340.050
 N+ stage0.01120.01960.83
 Time for node resection0.00010.00220.95

ASA score 3 and mitral valve dysfunction were significant predictors of atrial fibrillation after lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. Italic values are statistically significant.

Table 3:

Robust multiple regression model using the Huber's method

VariableCoefficientStandard errorP
ASA score 30.49970.17220.032
 Fluid duration0.00000.00190.98
 Hx of MI−0.00970.03150.75
Presence of mitral valve dysfunction0.48920.17340.050
 N+ stage0.01120.01960.83
 Time for node resection0.00010.00220.95
VariableCoefficientStandard errorP
ASA score 30.49970.17220.032
 Fluid duration0.00000.00190.98
 Hx of MI−0.00970.03150.75
Presence of mitral valve dysfunction0.48920.17340.050
 N+ stage0.01120.01960.83
 Time for node resection0.00010.00220.95

ASA score 3 and mitral valve dysfunction were significant predictors of atrial fibrillation after lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. Italic values are statistically significant.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close