. | Never (n = 617) . | Past (n = 380) . | Current (n = 282) . |
---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted | |||
BMD lumbar spine | 0.91 ± 0.15a | 0.94 ± 0.17b | 0.98 ± 0.15c |
TBS lumbar spine | 1.28 ± 0.10a | 1.27 ± 0.10a | 1.31 ± 0.10b |
BMD femoral neck | 0.73 ± 0.11a | 0.73 ± 0.10a | 0.76 ± 0.11b |
BMD total hip | 0.85 ± 0.12a | 0.85 ± 0.11a | 0.89 ± 0.11b |
Age- and BMI-adjusted | |||
BMD lumbar spine | 0.91 ± 0.01a | 0.94 ± 0.01b | 0.98 ± 0.01c |
TBS lumbar spine | 1.27 ± 0.01a | 1.29 ± 0.01a | 1.31 ± 0.01b |
BMD femoral neck | 0.72 ± 0.01a | 0.73 ± 0.01a | 0.76 ± 0.01b |
BMD total hip | 0.84 ± 0.01a | 0.86 ± 0.01b | 0.89 ± 0.01c |
. | Never (n = 617) . | Past (n = 380) . | Current (n = 282) . |
---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted | |||
BMD lumbar spine | 0.91 ± 0.15a | 0.94 ± 0.17b | 0.98 ± 0.15c |
TBS lumbar spine | 1.28 ± 0.10a | 1.27 ± 0.10a | 1.31 ± 0.10b |
BMD femoral neck | 0.73 ± 0.11a | 0.73 ± 0.10a | 0.76 ± 0.11b |
BMD total hip | 0.85 ± 0.12a | 0.85 ± 0.11a | 0.89 ± 0.11b |
Age- and BMI-adjusted | |||
BMD lumbar spine | 0.91 ± 0.01a | 0.94 ± 0.01b | 0.98 ± 0.01c |
TBS lumbar spine | 1.27 ± 0.01a | 1.29 ± 0.01a | 1.31 ± 0.01b |
BMD femoral neck | 0.72 ± 0.01a | 0.73 ± 0.01a | 0.76 ± 0.01b |
BMD total hip | 0.84 ± 0.01a | 0.86 ± 0.01b | 0.89 ± 0.01c |
Results are expressed as adjusted mean ± SE. Between-group analysis was performed using ANOVA. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons using the method of Scheffe.
Values with superscripts are significantly different at P < .05 for pairwise comparisons (a vs b, b vs c).
. | Never (n = 617) . | Past (n = 380) . | Current (n = 282) . |
---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted | |||
BMD lumbar spine | 0.91 ± 0.15a | 0.94 ± 0.17b | 0.98 ± 0.15c |
TBS lumbar spine | 1.28 ± 0.10a | 1.27 ± 0.10a | 1.31 ± 0.10b |
BMD femoral neck | 0.73 ± 0.11a | 0.73 ± 0.10a | 0.76 ± 0.11b |
BMD total hip | 0.85 ± 0.12a | 0.85 ± 0.11a | 0.89 ± 0.11b |
Age- and BMI-adjusted | |||
BMD lumbar spine | 0.91 ± 0.01a | 0.94 ± 0.01b | 0.98 ± 0.01c |
TBS lumbar spine | 1.27 ± 0.01a | 1.29 ± 0.01a | 1.31 ± 0.01b |
BMD femoral neck | 0.72 ± 0.01a | 0.73 ± 0.01a | 0.76 ± 0.01b |
BMD total hip | 0.84 ± 0.01a | 0.86 ± 0.01b | 0.89 ± 0.01c |
. | Never (n = 617) . | Past (n = 380) . | Current (n = 282) . |
---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted | |||
BMD lumbar spine | 0.91 ± 0.15a | 0.94 ± 0.17b | 0.98 ± 0.15c |
TBS lumbar spine | 1.28 ± 0.10a | 1.27 ± 0.10a | 1.31 ± 0.10b |
BMD femoral neck | 0.73 ± 0.11a | 0.73 ± 0.10a | 0.76 ± 0.11b |
BMD total hip | 0.85 ± 0.12a | 0.85 ± 0.11a | 0.89 ± 0.11b |
Age- and BMI-adjusted | |||
BMD lumbar spine | 0.91 ± 0.01a | 0.94 ± 0.01b | 0.98 ± 0.01c |
TBS lumbar spine | 1.27 ± 0.01a | 1.29 ± 0.01a | 1.31 ± 0.01b |
BMD femoral neck | 0.72 ± 0.01a | 0.73 ± 0.01a | 0.76 ± 0.01b |
BMD total hip | 0.84 ± 0.01a | 0.86 ± 0.01b | 0.89 ± 0.01c |
Results are expressed as adjusted mean ± SE. Between-group analysis was performed using ANOVA. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons using the method of Scheffe.
Values with superscripts are significantly different at P < .05 for pairwise comparisons (a vs b, b vs c).
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.