Table 2

BMD and TBS of the Sample According to MHT Status

Never (n = 617)Past (n = 380)Current (n = 282)
Unadjusted
 BMD lumbar spine0.91 ± 0.15a0.94 ± 0.17b0.98 ± 0.15c
 TBS lumbar spine1.28 ± 0.10a1.27 ± 0.10a1.31 ± 0.10b
 BMD femoral neck0.73 ± 0.11a0.73 ± 0.10a0.76 ± 0.11b
 BMD total hip0.85 ± 0.12a0.85 ± 0.11a0.89 ± 0.11b
Age- and BMI-adjusted
 BMD lumbar spine0.91 ± 0.01a0.94 ± 0.01b0.98 ± 0.01c
 TBS lumbar spine1.27 ± 0.01a1.29 ± 0.01a1.31 ± 0.01b
 BMD femoral neck0.72 ± 0.01a0.73 ± 0.01a0.76 ± 0.01b
 BMD total hip0.84 ± 0.01a0.86 ± 0.01b0.89 ± 0.01c
Never (n = 617)Past (n = 380)Current (n = 282)
Unadjusted
 BMD lumbar spine0.91 ± 0.15a0.94 ± 0.17b0.98 ± 0.15c
 TBS lumbar spine1.28 ± 0.10a1.27 ± 0.10a1.31 ± 0.10b
 BMD femoral neck0.73 ± 0.11a0.73 ± 0.10a0.76 ± 0.11b
 BMD total hip0.85 ± 0.12a0.85 ± 0.11a0.89 ± 0.11b
Age- and BMI-adjusted
 BMD lumbar spine0.91 ± 0.01a0.94 ± 0.01b0.98 ± 0.01c
 TBS lumbar spine1.27 ± 0.01a1.29 ± 0.01a1.31 ± 0.01b
 BMD femoral neck0.72 ± 0.01a0.73 ± 0.01a0.76 ± 0.01b
 BMD total hip0.84 ± 0.01a0.86 ± 0.01b0.89 ± 0.01c

Results are expressed as adjusted mean ± SE. Between-group analysis was performed using ANOVA. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons using the method of Scheffe.

a,b,c

Values with superscripts are significantly different at P < .05 for pairwise comparisons (a vs b, b vs c).

Table 2

BMD and TBS of the Sample According to MHT Status

Never (n = 617)Past (n = 380)Current (n = 282)
Unadjusted
 BMD lumbar spine0.91 ± 0.15a0.94 ± 0.17b0.98 ± 0.15c
 TBS lumbar spine1.28 ± 0.10a1.27 ± 0.10a1.31 ± 0.10b
 BMD femoral neck0.73 ± 0.11a0.73 ± 0.10a0.76 ± 0.11b
 BMD total hip0.85 ± 0.12a0.85 ± 0.11a0.89 ± 0.11b
Age- and BMI-adjusted
 BMD lumbar spine0.91 ± 0.01a0.94 ± 0.01b0.98 ± 0.01c
 TBS lumbar spine1.27 ± 0.01a1.29 ± 0.01a1.31 ± 0.01b
 BMD femoral neck0.72 ± 0.01a0.73 ± 0.01a0.76 ± 0.01b
 BMD total hip0.84 ± 0.01a0.86 ± 0.01b0.89 ± 0.01c
Never (n = 617)Past (n = 380)Current (n = 282)
Unadjusted
 BMD lumbar spine0.91 ± 0.15a0.94 ± 0.17b0.98 ± 0.15c
 TBS lumbar spine1.28 ± 0.10a1.27 ± 0.10a1.31 ± 0.10b
 BMD femoral neck0.73 ± 0.11a0.73 ± 0.10a0.76 ± 0.11b
 BMD total hip0.85 ± 0.12a0.85 ± 0.11a0.89 ± 0.11b
Age- and BMI-adjusted
 BMD lumbar spine0.91 ± 0.01a0.94 ± 0.01b0.98 ± 0.01c
 TBS lumbar spine1.27 ± 0.01a1.29 ± 0.01a1.31 ± 0.01b
 BMD femoral neck0.72 ± 0.01a0.73 ± 0.01a0.76 ± 0.01b
 BMD total hip0.84 ± 0.01a0.86 ± 0.01b0.89 ± 0.01c

Results are expressed as adjusted mean ± SE. Between-group analysis was performed using ANOVA. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons using the method of Scheffe.

a,b,c

Values with superscripts are significantly different at P < .05 for pairwise comparisons (a vs b, b vs c).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close