Table 2.

Body Composition Measured During the Entire Study: Comparison of MF-BIA and ADP With DXA

Method and VariableVisit C-1Visit C-2Visit C-3Visit C-4
r295% CIPr295% CIPr295% CIPr295% CIP
Model 1: unadjusted
 MF-BIA
  FM kg0.890.80–0.99< 0.0010.880.76–1.01< 0.0010.790.64–0.93< 0.0010.820.68–0.97< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.790.64–0.94< 0.0010.760.63–0.89< 0.0010.730.61–0.85< 0.0010.750.63–0.87< 0.001
  FFM, kg0.910.80–1.01< 0.0010.840.75–0.94< 0.0010.840.75–0.93< 0.0010.860.79–0.94< 0.001
 ADP
  FM, kg0.740.56–0.92< 0.0010.610.47–0.76< 0.0010.520.24–0.800.0010.490.26–0.72< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.500.31–0.69< 0.0010.490.28–0.70< 0.0010.340.12–0.560.0040.370.07–0.660.017
  FFM, kg0.760.60–0.93< 0.0010.720.50–0.95< 0.0010.670.51–0.84< 0.0010.820.52–1.12< 0.001
Model 2: adjusted by age and sex
 MF-BIA
  FM, kg0.900.81–1.00< 0.0010.950.84–1.05< 0.0010.860.73–0.99< 0.0010.860.74–0.98< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.770.57–0.96< 0.0010.810.62–1.00< 0.0010.730.57–0.89< 0.0010.760.59–0.93< 0.001
  FFM, kg0.890.71–1.07< 0.0010.840.66–1.02< 0.0010.790.63–0.94< 0.0010.820.67–0.97< 0.001
 ADP
  FM, kg0.750.55–0.94< 0.0010.610.46–0.76< 0.0010.590.26–0.910.0010.550.27–0.820.001
  FM percentage, %0.400.20–0.610.0010.350.15–0.560.0020.15−0.12–0.420.2710.360.08–0.630.013
  FFM, kg0.570.37–0.76< 0.0010.370.07–0.660.0160.420.17–0.660.0020.450.19–0.710.002
Method and VariableVisit C-1Visit C-2Visit C-3Visit C-4
r295% CIPr295% CIPr295% CIPr295% CIP
Model 1: unadjusted
 MF-BIA
  FM kg0.890.80–0.99< 0.0010.880.76–1.01< 0.0010.790.64–0.93< 0.0010.820.68–0.97< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.790.64–0.94< 0.0010.760.63–0.89< 0.0010.730.61–0.85< 0.0010.750.63–0.87< 0.001
  FFM, kg0.910.80–1.01< 0.0010.840.75–0.94< 0.0010.840.75–0.93< 0.0010.860.79–0.94< 0.001
 ADP
  FM, kg0.740.56–0.92< 0.0010.610.47–0.76< 0.0010.520.24–0.800.0010.490.26–0.72< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.500.31–0.69< 0.0010.490.28–0.70< 0.0010.340.12–0.560.0040.370.07–0.660.017
  FFM, kg0.760.60–0.93< 0.0010.720.50–0.95< 0.0010.670.51–0.84< 0.0010.820.52–1.12< 0.001
Model 2: adjusted by age and sex
 MF-BIA
  FM, kg0.900.81–1.00< 0.0010.950.84–1.05< 0.0010.860.73–0.99< 0.0010.860.74–0.98< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.770.57–0.96< 0.0010.810.62–1.00< 0.0010.730.57–0.89< 0.0010.760.59–0.93< 0.001
  FFM, kg0.890.71–1.07< 0.0010.840.66–1.02< 0.0010.790.63–0.94< 0.0010.820.67–0.97< 0.001
 ADP
  FM, kg0.750.55–0.94< 0.0010.610.46–0.76< 0.0010.590.26–0.910.0010.550.27–0.820.001
  FM percentage, %0.400.20–0.610.0010.350.15–0.560.0020.15−0.12–0.420.2710.360.08–0.630.013
  FFM, kg0.570.37–0.76< 0.0010.370.07–0.660.0160.420.17–0.660.0020.450.19–0.710.002

Correlation coefficients (r2), confidence intervals (95% CIs), and P values are given for each of the methods compared with DXA.

Table 2.

Body Composition Measured During the Entire Study: Comparison of MF-BIA and ADP With DXA

Method and VariableVisit C-1Visit C-2Visit C-3Visit C-4
r295% CIPr295% CIPr295% CIPr295% CIP
Model 1: unadjusted
 MF-BIA
  FM kg0.890.80–0.99< 0.0010.880.76–1.01< 0.0010.790.64–0.93< 0.0010.820.68–0.97< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.790.64–0.94< 0.0010.760.63–0.89< 0.0010.730.61–0.85< 0.0010.750.63–0.87< 0.001
  FFM, kg0.910.80–1.01< 0.0010.840.75–0.94< 0.0010.840.75–0.93< 0.0010.860.79–0.94< 0.001
 ADP
  FM, kg0.740.56–0.92< 0.0010.610.47–0.76< 0.0010.520.24–0.800.0010.490.26–0.72< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.500.31–0.69< 0.0010.490.28–0.70< 0.0010.340.12–0.560.0040.370.07–0.660.017
  FFM, kg0.760.60–0.93< 0.0010.720.50–0.95< 0.0010.670.51–0.84< 0.0010.820.52–1.12< 0.001
Model 2: adjusted by age and sex
 MF-BIA
  FM, kg0.900.81–1.00< 0.0010.950.84–1.05< 0.0010.860.73–0.99< 0.0010.860.74–0.98< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.770.57–0.96< 0.0010.810.62–1.00< 0.0010.730.57–0.89< 0.0010.760.59–0.93< 0.001
  FFM, kg0.890.71–1.07< 0.0010.840.66–1.02< 0.0010.790.63–0.94< 0.0010.820.67–0.97< 0.001
 ADP
  FM, kg0.750.55–0.94< 0.0010.610.46–0.76< 0.0010.590.26–0.910.0010.550.27–0.820.001
  FM percentage, %0.400.20–0.610.0010.350.15–0.560.0020.15−0.12–0.420.2710.360.08–0.630.013
  FFM, kg0.570.37–0.76< 0.0010.370.07–0.660.0160.420.17–0.660.0020.450.19–0.710.002
Method and VariableVisit C-1Visit C-2Visit C-3Visit C-4
r295% CIPr295% CIPr295% CIPr295% CIP
Model 1: unadjusted
 MF-BIA
  FM kg0.890.80–0.99< 0.0010.880.76–1.01< 0.0010.790.64–0.93< 0.0010.820.68–0.97< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.790.64–0.94< 0.0010.760.63–0.89< 0.0010.730.61–0.85< 0.0010.750.63–0.87< 0.001
  FFM, kg0.910.80–1.01< 0.0010.840.75–0.94< 0.0010.840.75–0.93< 0.0010.860.79–0.94< 0.001
 ADP
  FM, kg0.740.56–0.92< 0.0010.610.47–0.76< 0.0010.520.24–0.800.0010.490.26–0.72< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.500.31–0.69< 0.0010.490.28–0.70< 0.0010.340.12–0.560.0040.370.07–0.660.017
  FFM, kg0.760.60–0.93< 0.0010.720.50–0.95< 0.0010.670.51–0.84< 0.0010.820.52–1.12< 0.001
Model 2: adjusted by age and sex
 MF-BIA
  FM, kg0.900.81–1.00< 0.0010.950.84–1.05< 0.0010.860.73–0.99< 0.0010.860.74–0.98< 0.001
  FM percentage, %0.770.57–0.96< 0.0010.810.62–1.00< 0.0010.730.57–0.89< 0.0010.760.59–0.93< 0.001
  FFM, kg0.890.71–1.07< 0.0010.840.66–1.02< 0.0010.790.63–0.94< 0.0010.820.67–0.97< 0.001
 ADP
  FM, kg0.750.55–0.94< 0.0010.610.46–0.76< 0.0010.590.26–0.910.0010.550.27–0.820.001
  FM percentage, %0.400.20–0.610.0010.350.15–0.560.0020.15−0.12–0.420.2710.360.08–0.630.013
  FFM, kg0.570.37–0.76< 0.0010.370.07–0.660.0160.420.17–0.660.0020.450.19–0.710.002

Correlation coefficients (r2), confidence intervals (95% CIs), and P values are given for each of the methods compared with DXA.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close