Sample . | nhits . | ntrials . | |$f_{\rm c}^{\rm flmnt}$| . | |$f_{\rm c}^{\rm rand}$| . | Excess . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . |
Δv = ±1000 km s−1 and Δd = 3 Mpc | |||||
H i | 7 | 7 | |$1.00^{+0.00}_{-0.23}$| | |$1.00^{+0.00}_{-0.05}$| | ∼1 |
NLA | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.93^{+0.07}_{-0.08}$| | ∼1 |
BLA | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.16^{+0.10}_{-0.10}$| | ∼4 |
O vi | 1 | 7 | |$0.14^{+0.26}_{-0.12}$| | |$0.15^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$| | ∼1 |
Δv = ±500 km s−1 and Δd = 3 Mpc | |||||
H i | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.58^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$| | ∼1 |
NLA | 3 | 7 | |$0.43^{+0.25}_{-0.22}$| | |$0.47^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$| | ∼1 |
BLA | 4 | 7 | |$0.57^{+0.22}_{-0.25}$| | |$0.08^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$| | ∼7 |
O vi | 1 | 7 | |$0.14^{+0.26}_{-0.12}$| | |$0.08^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$| | ∼1 |
Sample . | nhits . | ntrials . | |$f_{\rm c}^{\rm flmnt}$| . | |$f_{\rm c}^{\rm rand}$| . | Excess . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . |
Δv = ±1000 km s−1 and Δd = 3 Mpc | |||||
H i | 7 | 7 | |$1.00^{+0.00}_{-0.23}$| | |$1.00^{+0.00}_{-0.05}$| | ∼1 |
NLA | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.93^{+0.07}_{-0.08}$| | ∼1 |
BLA | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.16^{+0.10}_{-0.10}$| | ∼4 |
O vi | 1 | 7 | |$0.14^{+0.26}_{-0.12}$| | |$0.15^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$| | ∼1 |
Δv = ±500 km s−1 and Δd = 3 Mpc | |||||
H i | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.58^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$| | ∼1 |
NLA | 3 | 7 | |$0.43^{+0.25}_{-0.22}$| | |$0.47^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$| | ∼1 |
BLA | 4 | 7 | |$0.57^{+0.22}_{-0.25}$| | |$0.08^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$| | ∼7 |
O vi | 1 | 7 | |$0.14^{+0.26}_{-0.12}$| | |$0.08^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$| | ∼1 |
Notes. (1) Sample of absorbing gas. (2) Number of ‘hits’ defined as sightlines showing absorption in a given sample, within Δv = {±1000, ±500} km s−1 and within Δd = 3 Mpc. (3) Number of ‘trials’ defined as the total number of sightlines to look for absorption. (4) Covering fraction close to cluster pairs estimated as nhits/ntrials (uncertainties correspond to those of a binomial 1σ c.l.). (5) Covering fraction in a random sightline for a given Δv = {±1000, ±500} km s−1. (6) Excess covering fraction defined as |$f_{{\rm c}}^{\rm flmnt}/f_{{\rm c}}^{\rm rand}$|.
Sample . | nhits . | ntrials . | |$f_{\rm c}^{\rm flmnt}$| . | |$f_{\rm c}^{\rm rand}$| . | Excess . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . |
Δv = ±1000 km s−1 and Δd = 3 Mpc | |||||
H i | 7 | 7 | |$1.00^{+0.00}_{-0.23}$| | |$1.00^{+0.00}_{-0.05}$| | ∼1 |
NLA | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.93^{+0.07}_{-0.08}$| | ∼1 |
BLA | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.16^{+0.10}_{-0.10}$| | ∼4 |
O vi | 1 | 7 | |$0.14^{+0.26}_{-0.12}$| | |$0.15^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$| | ∼1 |
Δv = ±500 km s−1 and Δd = 3 Mpc | |||||
H i | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.58^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$| | ∼1 |
NLA | 3 | 7 | |$0.43^{+0.25}_{-0.22}$| | |$0.47^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$| | ∼1 |
BLA | 4 | 7 | |$0.57^{+0.22}_{-0.25}$| | |$0.08^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$| | ∼7 |
O vi | 1 | 7 | |$0.14^{+0.26}_{-0.12}$| | |$0.08^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$| | ∼1 |
Sample . | nhits . | ntrials . | |$f_{\rm c}^{\rm flmnt}$| . | |$f_{\rm c}^{\rm rand}$| . | Excess . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . |
Δv = ±1000 km s−1 and Δd = 3 Mpc | |||||
H i | 7 | 7 | |$1.00^{+0.00}_{-0.23}$| | |$1.00^{+0.00}_{-0.05}$| | ∼1 |
NLA | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.93^{+0.07}_{-0.08}$| | ∼1 |
BLA | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.16^{+0.10}_{-0.10}$| | ∼4 |
O vi | 1 | 7 | |$0.14^{+0.26}_{-0.12}$| | |$0.15^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$| | ∼1 |
Δv = ±500 km s−1 and Δd = 3 Mpc | |||||
H i | 5 | 7 | |$0.71^{+0.18}_{-0.26}$| | |$0.58^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$| | ∼1 |
NLA | 3 | 7 | |$0.43^{+0.25}_{-0.22}$| | |$0.47^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$| | ∼1 |
BLA | 4 | 7 | |$0.57^{+0.22}_{-0.25}$| | |$0.08^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$| | ∼7 |
O vi | 1 | 7 | |$0.14^{+0.26}_{-0.12}$| | |$0.08^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$| | ∼1 |
Notes. (1) Sample of absorbing gas. (2) Number of ‘hits’ defined as sightlines showing absorption in a given sample, within Δv = {±1000, ±500} km s−1 and within Δd = 3 Mpc. (3) Number of ‘trials’ defined as the total number of sightlines to look for absorption. (4) Covering fraction close to cluster pairs estimated as nhits/ntrials (uncertainties correspond to those of a binomial 1σ c.l.). (5) Covering fraction in a random sightline for a given Δv = {±1000, ±500} km s−1. (6) Excess covering fraction defined as |$f_{{\rm c}}^{\rm flmnt}/f_{{\rm c}}^{\rm rand}$|.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.