Table 2.

Preferences for different recruitment methods—questionnaire responses.a

Total sample (n = 32)Focus group
Prenatal (n = 16)Postnatal (n = 16)P-valueb
PP6.6 (0.8)6.4 (1.0)6.7 (0.6)NS
In-person5.8 (1.4)5.9 (1.0)5.8 (1.7)NS
Mail (physical)5.2 (1.5)5.4 (1.4)5.0 (1.6)NS
Email4.4 (1.8)5.1 (1.2)3.6 (2.1)<.05
Social media/blog4.3 (1.7)5.3 (1.7)3.3 (1.1)<.0001
Phone2.5 (1.5)2.4 (1.2)2.6 (1.8)NS
Total sample (n = 32)Focus group
Prenatal (n = 16)Postnatal (n = 16)P-valueb
PP6.6 (0.8)6.4 (1.0)6.7 (0.6)NS
In-person5.8 (1.4)5.9 (1.0)5.8 (1.7)NS
Mail (physical)5.2 (1.5)5.4 (1.4)5.0 (1.6)NS
Email4.4 (1.8)5.1 (1.2)3.6 (2.1)<.05
Social media/blog4.3 (1.7)5.3 (1.7)3.3 (1.1)<.0001
Phone2.5 (1.5)2.4 (1.2)2.6 (1.8)NS

Abbreviations: NS, non-significant; SD, standard deviation.

a

7-point Likert scale: 1 = very uncomfortable, 2 = moderately uncomfortable, 3 = slightly uncomfortable, 4 = neutral, 5 = slightly comfortable, 6 = moderately comfortable, 7 = very comfortable.

b

Statistical significance was conducted using a one-sided, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Exact test.

Table 2.

Preferences for different recruitment methods—questionnaire responses.a

Total sample (n = 32)Focus group
Prenatal (n = 16)Postnatal (n = 16)P-valueb
PP6.6 (0.8)6.4 (1.0)6.7 (0.6)NS
In-person5.8 (1.4)5.9 (1.0)5.8 (1.7)NS
Mail (physical)5.2 (1.5)5.4 (1.4)5.0 (1.6)NS
Email4.4 (1.8)5.1 (1.2)3.6 (2.1)<.05
Social media/blog4.3 (1.7)5.3 (1.7)3.3 (1.1)<.0001
Phone2.5 (1.5)2.4 (1.2)2.6 (1.8)NS
Total sample (n = 32)Focus group
Prenatal (n = 16)Postnatal (n = 16)P-valueb
PP6.6 (0.8)6.4 (1.0)6.7 (0.6)NS
In-person5.8 (1.4)5.9 (1.0)5.8 (1.7)NS
Mail (physical)5.2 (1.5)5.4 (1.4)5.0 (1.6)NS
Email4.4 (1.8)5.1 (1.2)3.6 (2.1)<.05
Social media/blog4.3 (1.7)5.3 (1.7)3.3 (1.1)<.0001
Phone2.5 (1.5)2.4 (1.2)2.6 (1.8)NS

Abbreviations: NS, non-significant; SD, standard deviation.

a

7-point Likert scale: 1 = very uncomfortable, 2 = moderately uncomfortable, 3 = slightly uncomfortable, 4 = neutral, 5 = slightly comfortable, 6 = moderately comfortable, 7 = very comfortable.

b

Statistical significance was conducted using a one-sided, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Exact test.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close