Table 5.

Evaluating different top-k sampling methods and different note chunk sizes for the Text Embeddings with GPT-4 approach on the manually annotated test-set. The bolded text represents the best peforming approach.

Top-k sampling approachNumber of sentences in note chunkConcept accuracyConcept F1
Constant (10%)10.730.66
Varying (using extrapolation)10.810.76
Varying (using extrapolation)20.820.78
Varying (using extrapolation)30.780.73
Varying (using extrapolation)40.810.78
Varying (using extrapolation)50.780.74
Top-k sampling approachNumber of sentences in note chunkConcept accuracyConcept F1
Constant (10%)10.730.66
Varying (using extrapolation)10.810.76
Varying (using extrapolation)20.820.78
Varying (using extrapolation)30.780.73
Varying (using extrapolation)40.810.78
Varying (using extrapolation)50.780.74
Table 5.

Evaluating different top-k sampling methods and different note chunk sizes for the Text Embeddings with GPT-4 approach on the manually annotated test-set. The bolded text represents the best peforming approach.

Top-k sampling approachNumber of sentences in note chunkConcept accuracyConcept F1
Constant (10%)10.730.66
Varying (using extrapolation)10.810.76
Varying (using extrapolation)20.820.78
Varying (using extrapolation)30.780.73
Varying (using extrapolation)40.810.78
Varying (using extrapolation)50.780.74
Top-k sampling approachNumber of sentences in note chunkConcept accuracyConcept F1
Constant (10%)10.730.66
Varying (using extrapolation)10.810.76
Varying (using extrapolation)20.820.78
Varying (using extrapolation)30.780.73
Varying (using extrapolation)40.810.78
Varying (using extrapolation)50.780.74
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close