Table 2

Demographic details of participants in the Delphi consensus study and the NGT meetings.

Participant characteristicsDelphi consensus exerciseNGT meetings
Round 1Round 2Round 3
Participant, n57535010
Response rate, %96.689.884.776.9
Age in years, median (range)50 (26–87)50 (26–87)49 (26–87)54 (39–60)
Gender, n (%)
 Men21 (36.8)20 (37.7)19 (38.0)1 (10.0)
 Women36 (63.2)33 (62.3)31 (62.0)9 (90.0)
Continent of residence, n (%)
 America8 (14.0)8 (15.1)7 (14.0)1 (10.0)
 Europe39 (68.4)37 (69.8)36 (72.0)8 (80.0)
 Australia8 (14.0)7 (13.2)6 (12.0)1 (10.0)
 Asia2 (3.5)1 (1.9)1 (2.0)0 (0.0)
Professional area, n (%)a
 Doctor12 (21.1)11 (20.8)11 (22.0)1 (10.0)
 Pharmacist23 (40.4)22 (41.5)22 (44.0)5 (50.0)
 Academic38 (67.0)35 (66.0)34 (68.0)10 (100.0)
 Journal editor6 (10.5)5 (9.4)5 (10.0)2 (20.0)
 Nurse3 (5.3)3 (5.7)1 (2.0)1 (10.0)
 Public member4 (7.0)3 (5.7)3 (6.0)0 (0.0)
Participant characteristicsDelphi consensus exerciseNGT meetings
Round 1Round 2Round 3
Participant, n57535010
Response rate, %96.689.884.776.9
Age in years, median (range)50 (26–87)50 (26–87)49 (26–87)54 (39–60)
Gender, n (%)
 Men21 (36.8)20 (37.7)19 (38.0)1 (10.0)
 Women36 (63.2)33 (62.3)31 (62.0)9 (90.0)
Continent of residence, n (%)
 America8 (14.0)8 (15.1)7 (14.0)1 (10.0)
 Europe39 (68.4)37 (69.8)36 (72.0)8 (80.0)
 Australia8 (14.0)7 (13.2)6 (12.0)1 (10.0)
 Asia2 (3.5)1 (1.9)1 (2.0)0 (0.0)
Professional area, n (%)a
 Doctor12 (21.1)11 (20.8)11 (22.0)1 (10.0)
 Pharmacist23 (40.4)22 (41.5)22 (44.0)5 (50.0)
 Academic38 (67.0)35 (66.0)34 (68.0)10 (100.0)
 Journal editor6 (10.5)5 (9.4)5 (10.0)2 (20.0)
 Nurse3 (5.3)3 (5.7)1 (2.0)1 (10.0)
 Public member4 (7.0)3 (5.7)3 (6.0)0 (0.0)
a

The sum of percentages shown in the table exceeds 100% as some participants selected multiple options.

Table 2

Demographic details of participants in the Delphi consensus study and the NGT meetings.

Participant characteristicsDelphi consensus exerciseNGT meetings
Round 1Round 2Round 3
Participant, n57535010
Response rate, %96.689.884.776.9
Age in years, median (range)50 (26–87)50 (26–87)49 (26–87)54 (39–60)
Gender, n (%)
 Men21 (36.8)20 (37.7)19 (38.0)1 (10.0)
 Women36 (63.2)33 (62.3)31 (62.0)9 (90.0)
Continent of residence, n (%)
 America8 (14.0)8 (15.1)7 (14.0)1 (10.0)
 Europe39 (68.4)37 (69.8)36 (72.0)8 (80.0)
 Australia8 (14.0)7 (13.2)6 (12.0)1 (10.0)
 Asia2 (3.5)1 (1.9)1 (2.0)0 (0.0)
Professional area, n (%)a
 Doctor12 (21.1)11 (20.8)11 (22.0)1 (10.0)
 Pharmacist23 (40.4)22 (41.5)22 (44.0)5 (50.0)
 Academic38 (67.0)35 (66.0)34 (68.0)10 (100.0)
 Journal editor6 (10.5)5 (9.4)5 (10.0)2 (20.0)
 Nurse3 (5.3)3 (5.7)1 (2.0)1 (10.0)
 Public member4 (7.0)3 (5.7)3 (6.0)0 (0.0)
Participant characteristicsDelphi consensus exerciseNGT meetings
Round 1Round 2Round 3
Participant, n57535010
Response rate, %96.689.884.776.9
Age in years, median (range)50 (26–87)50 (26–87)49 (26–87)54 (39–60)
Gender, n (%)
 Men21 (36.8)20 (37.7)19 (38.0)1 (10.0)
 Women36 (63.2)33 (62.3)31 (62.0)9 (90.0)
Continent of residence, n (%)
 America8 (14.0)8 (15.1)7 (14.0)1 (10.0)
 Europe39 (68.4)37 (69.8)36 (72.0)8 (80.0)
 Australia8 (14.0)7 (13.2)6 (12.0)1 (10.0)
 Asia2 (3.5)1 (1.9)1 (2.0)0 (0.0)
Professional area, n (%)a
 Doctor12 (21.1)11 (20.8)11 (22.0)1 (10.0)
 Pharmacist23 (40.4)22 (41.5)22 (44.0)5 (50.0)
 Academic38 (67.0)35 (66.0)34 (68.0)10 (100.0)
 Journal editor6 (10.5)5 (9.4)5 (10.0)2 (20.0)
 Nurse3 (5.3)3 (5.7)1 (2.0)1 (10.0)
 Public member4 (7.0)3 (5.7)3 (6.0)0 (0.0)
a

The sum of percentages shown in the table exceeds 100% as some participants selected multiple options.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close