Sensitivity analysis of the effect of the number of consecutive work days on presenteeism, and the mediating effects of fatigue, in disaster responders.
. | Adjusted ORa . | 95% CI . | P value . | Bootstrapping . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.025 CI . | 0.975 CI . | ||||
Model pathwaysb | |||||
Total effect: X → Y | 1.03 | 1.01–1.04 | <.001 | 1.02 | 1.07 |
Direct effect: X → Y | 1.04 | 1.02–1.05 | <.001 | 1.01 | 1.06 |
Indirect effect: X → M → Y | 0.993 | 0.988–0.997 | <.001 | 0.987 | 0.995 |
Model fitness | |||||
Model test Baseline Model | 0.073 | ||||
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | 0.975 | ||||
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) | 0.994 | ||||
RMSEA | 0.016 (0.000–0.031) | ||||
SRMR | 0.002 |
. | Adjusted ORa . | 95% CI . | P value . | Bootstrapping . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.025 CI . | 0.975 CI . | ||||
Model pathwaysb | |||||
Total effect: X → Y | 1.03 | 1.01–1.04 | <.001 | 1.02 | 1.07 |
Direct effect: X → Y | 1.04 | 1.02–1.05 | <.001 | 1.01 | 1.06 |
Indirect effect: X → M → Y | 0.993 | 0.988–0.997 | <.001 | 0.987 | 0.995 |
Model fitness | |||||
Model test Baseline Model | 0.073 | ||||
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | 0.975 | ||||
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) | 0.994 | ||||
RMSEA | 0.016 (0.000–0.031) | ||||
SRMR | 0.002 |
Abbreviations: M, fatigue; OR, odds ratio, RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; X, duration of working days; Y, presenteeism.
OR was adjusted for occupation, type of activity, disaster phase, presence of physical or mental symptoms, and perception of the working environment.
Independent variable (working duration) was modeled as a continuous variable.
Sensitivity analysis of the effect of the number of consecutive work days on presenteeism, and the mediating effects of fatigue, in disaster responders.
. | Adjusted ORa . | 95% CI . | P value . | Bootstrapping . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.025 CI . | 0.975 CI . | ||||
Model pathwaysb | |||||
Total effect: X → Y | 1.03 | 1.01–1.04 | <.001 | 1.02 | 1.07 |
Direct effect: X → Y | 1.04 | 1.02–1.05 | <.001 | 1.01 | 1.06 |
Indirect effect: X → M → Y | 0.993 | 0.988–0.997 | <.001 | 0.987 | 0.995 |
Model fitness | |||||
Model test Baseline Model | 0.073 | ||||
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | 0.975 | ||||
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) | 0.994 | ||||
RMSEA | 0.016 (0.000–0.031) | ||||
SRMR | 0.002 |
. | Adjusted ORa . | 95% CI . | P value . | Bootstrapping . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.025 CI . | 0.975 CI . | ||||
Model pathwaysb | |||||
Total effect: X → Y | 1.03 | 1.01–1.04 | <.001 | 1.02 | 1.07 |
Direct effect: X → Y | 1.04 | 1.02–1.05 | <.001 | 1.01 | 1.06 |
Indirect effect: X → M → Y | 0.993 | 0.988–0.997 | <.001 | 0.987 | 0.995 |
Model fitness | |||||
Model test Baseline Model | 0.073 | ||||
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | 0.975 | ||||
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) | 0.994 | ||||
RMSEA | 0.016 (0.000–0.031) | ||||
SRMR | 0.002 |
Abbreviations: M, fatigue; OR, odds ratio, RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; X, duration of working days; Y, presenteeism.
OR was adjusted for occupation, type of activity, disaster phase, presence of physical or mental symptoms, and perception of the working environment.
Independent variable (working duration) was modeled as a continuous variable.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.