Table 3.

Trajectories of Benefits of Caregiving Among Informal Caregivers of Older Adults in the Included Studies

StudyStudy durationCR diagnosisMeasure
(min–max)
Statistical model for trend(s)Trend(s)p-value for trend(s)
Studies that delineated average trajectory(ies) of overall sample
Milbury et al. (2013)6 moCancerCRA-ce (1–5)Paired t-testStableNS
Van Den Kieboom et al. (2023)15 moDementiaCRA-ce (7–35)MEMDecrease.026
Walker et al. (1996)3.0 yrADL/IADL limitationsCS (1–7)LGCMStableNS
Study that reported distinctive trajectories of multiple groups of overall sample
Quinn et al. (2024)2 yrDementiaPAC (9–54)GMMDecrease (15.2% of overall sample)<.05
Stable (67.5% of overall sample)NS
Stable (9.3% of overall sample)NS
Increase (3.4% of overall sample)<.05
Decrease (4.5% of overall sample)<.05
Malhotra et al. (2018)7.1 mo (on average)StrokePAC (9–54)GBTMDecrease (41.9% of overall sample)<.05
Decrease (58.1% of overall sample)<.05
StudyStudy durationCR diagnosisMeasure
(min–max)
Statistical model for trend(s)Trend(s)p-value for trend(s)
Studies that delineated average trajectory(ies) of overall sample
Milbury et al. (2013)6 moCancerCRA-ce (1–5)Paired t-testStableNS
Van Den Kieboom et al. (2023)15 moDementiaCRA-ce (7–35)MEMDecrease.026
Walker et al. (1996)3.0 yrADL/IADL limitationsCS (1–7)LGCMStableNS
Study that reported distinctive trajectories of multiple groups of overall sample
Quinn et al. (2024)2 yrDementiaPAC (9–54)GMMDecrease (15.2% of overall sample)<.05
Stable (67.5% of overall sample)NS
Stable (9.3% of overall sample)NS
Increase (3.4% of overall sample)<.05
Decrease (4.5% of overall sample)<.05
Malhotra et al. (2018)7.1 mo (on average)StrokePAC (9–54)GBTMDecrease (41.9% of overall sample)<.05
Decrease (58.1% of overall sample)<.05

Note: ADL = activities of daily living; CGS = Caregiver Gratification Scale; CR = care-recipient; CRA-ce = Caregiver Esteem subscale of Caregiver Reaction Assessment; CRI = Caregiver Reaction Inventory; CS = caregiving satisfaction; GBTM = Group-Based Trajectory Model; GMM = Growth Mixture Model; IADL = instrumental activities of daily living; LGCM = latent growth curve model; MEM = mixed-effect model; mo = months; NR = not reported; NS = not significant; PAC = Positive Aspects of Caregiving Scale; yr = years.

Table 3.

Trajectories of Benefits of Caregiving Among Informal Caregivers of Older Adults in the Included Studies

StudyStudy durationCR diagnosisMeasure
(min–max)
Statistical model for trend(s)Trend(s)p-value for trend(s)
Studies that delineated average trajectory(ies) of overall sample
Milbury et al. (2013)6 moCancerCRA-ce (1–5)Paired t-testStableNS
Van Den Kieboom et al. (2023)15 moDementiaCRA-ce (7–35)MEMDecrease.026
Walker et al. (1996)3.0 yrADL/IADL limitationsCS (1–7)LGCMStableNS
Study that reported distinctive trajectories of multiple groups of overall sample
Quinn et al. (2024)2 yrDementiaPAC (9–54)GMMDecrease (15.2% of overall sample)<.05
Stable (67.5% of overall sample)NS
Stable (9.3% of overall sample)NS
Increase (3.4% of overall sample)<.05
Decrease (4.5% of overall sample)<.05
Malhotra et al. (2018)7.1 mo (on average)StrokePAC (9–54)GBTMDecrease (41.9% of overall sample)<.05
Decrease (58.1% of overall sample)<.05
StudyStudy durationCR diagnosisMeasure
(min–max)
Statistical model for trend(s)Trend(s)p-value for trend(s)
Studies that delineated average trajectory(ies) of overall sample
Milbury et al. (2013)6 moCancerCRA-ce (1–5)Paired t-testStableNS
Van Den Kieboom et al. (2023)15 moDementiaCRA-ce (7–35)MEMDecrease.026
Walker et al. (1996)3.0 yrADL/IADL limitationsCS (1–7)LGCMStableNS
Study that reported distinctive trajectories of multiple groups of overall sample
Quinn et al. (2024)2 yrDementiaPAC (9–54)GMMDecrease (15.2% of overall sample)<.05
Stable (67.5% of overall sample)NS
Stable (9.3% of overall sample)NS
Increase (3.4% of overall sample)<.05
Decrease (4.5% of overall sample)<.05
Malhotra et al. (2018)7.1 mo (on average)StrokePAC (9–54)GBTMDecrease (41.9% of overall sample)<.05
Decrease (58.1% of overall sample)<.05

Note: ADL = activities of daily living; CGS = Caregiver Gratification Scale; CR = care-recipient; CRA-ce = Caregiver Esteem subscale of Caregiver Reaction Assessment; CRI = Caregiver Reaction Inventory; CS = caregiving satisfaction; GBTM = Group-Based Trajectory Model; GMM = Growth Mixture Model; IADL = instrumental activities of daily living; LGCM = latent growth curve model; MEM = mixed-effect model; mo = months; NR = not reported; NS = not significant; PAC = Positive Aspects of Caregiving Scale; yr = years.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close