Table 1.

Performance comparison of SVM, RF, D-SCRIPT, Topsy-Turvy, Alphafold3, PIPR, and ProNEP on the independent test dataset.a

ModelAccuracyPrecisionSensitivityF1-scoreAUROCAUPRC
SVM0.781 ± 0.0240.157 ± 0.0280.323 ± 0.0370.277 ± 0.1680.617 ± 0.0650.176 ± 0.057
RF0.806 ± 0.0750.749 ± 0.0860.610 ± 0.1220.716 ± 0.1210.783 ± 0.1270.483 ± 0.117
D-SCRIPT0.609 ± 0.0730.324 ± 0.2330.719 ± 0.2520.335 ± 0.0560.686 ± 0.0650.306 ± 0.093
Topsy-Turvy0.672 ± 0.1170.225 ± 0.1280.546 ± 0.3290.221 ± 0.0460.64 ± 0.0460.359 ± 0.117
Alphafold30.1850.09520.91890.17260.56880.1185
PIPR0.912 ± 0.0080.569 ± 0.0320.594 ± 0.0260.581 ± 0.0260.879 ± 0.0160.678 ± 0.004
ProNEP0.914 ± 0.0280.945 ± 0.0350.915 ± 0.0360.928 ± 0.0220.966 ± 0.0120.747 ± 0.054
ModelAccuracyPrecisionSensitivityF1-scoreAUROCAUPRC
SVM0.781 ± 0.0240.157 ± 0.0280.323 ± 0.0370.277 ± 0.1680.617 ± 0.0650.176 ± 0.057
RF0.806 ± 0.0750.749 ± 0.0860.610 ± 0.1220.716 ± 0.1210.783 ± 0.1270.483 ± 0.117
D-SCRIPT0.609 ± 0.0730.324 ± 0.2330.719 ± 0.2520.335 ± 0.0560.686 ± 0.0650.306 ± 0.093
Topsy-Turvy0.672 ± 0.1170.225 ± 0.1280.546 ± 0.3290.221 ± 0.0460.64 ± 0.0460.359 ± 0.117
Alphafold30.1850.09520.91890.17260.56880.1185
PIPR0.912 ± 0.0080.569 ± 0.0320.594 ± 0.0260.581 ± 0.0260.879 ± 0.0160.678 ± 0.004
ProNEP0.914 ± 0.0280.945 ± 0.0350.915 ± 0.0360.928 ± 0.0220.966 ± 0.0120.747 ± 0.054
a

ProNEP was trained 10 times with 10 different negative samples, while the other models, excluding Alphafold3, were trained 6 times. All models, except Alphafold3, used a threshold that maximized the F1 score.

Table 1.

Performance comparison of SVM, RF, D-SCRIPT, Topsy-Turvy, Alphafold3, PIPR, and ProNEP on the independent test dataset.a

ModelAccuracyPrecisionSensitivityF1-scoreAUROCAUPRC
SVM0.781 ± 0.0240.157 ± 0.0280.323 ± 0.0370.277 ± 0.1680.617 ± 0.0650.176 ± 0.057
RF0.806 ± 0.0750.749 ± 0.0860.610 ± 0.1220.716 ± 0.1210.783 ± 0.1270.483 ± 0.117
D-SCRIPT0.609 ± 0.0730.324 ± 0.2330.719 ± 0.2520.335 ± 0.0560.686 ± 0.0650.306 ± 0.093
Topsy-Turvy0.672 ± 0.1170.225 ± 0.1280.546 ± 0.3290.221 ± 0.0460.64 ± 0.0460.359 ± 0.117
Alphafold30.1850.09520.91890.17260.56880.1185
PIPR0.912 ± 0.0080.569 ± 0.0320.594 ± 0.0260.581 ± 0.0260.879 ± 0.0160.678 ± 0.004
ProNEP0.914 ± 0.0280.945 ± 0.0350.915 ± 0.0360.928 ± 0.0220.966 ± 0.0120.747 ± 0.054
ModelAccuracyPrecisionSensitivityF1-scoreAUROCAUPRC
SVM0.781 ± 0.0240.157 ± 0.0280.323 ± 0.0370.277 ± 0.1680.617 ± 0.0650.176 ± 0.057
RF0.806 ± 0.0750.749 ± 0.0860.610 ± 0.1220.716 ± 0.1210.783 ± 0.1270.483 ± 0.117
D-SCRIPT0.609 ± 0.0730.324 ± 0.2330.719 ± 0.2520.335 ± 0.0560.686 ± 0.0650.306 ± 0.093
Topsy-Turvy0.672 ± 0.1170.225 ± 0.1280.546 ± 0.3290.221 ± 0.0460.64 ± 0.0460.359 ± 0.117
Alphafold30.1850.09520.91890.17260.56880.1185
PIPR0.912 ± 0.0080.569 ± 0.0320.594 ± 0.0260.581 ± 0.0260.879 ± 0.0160.678 ± 0.004
ProNEP0.914 ± 0.0280.945 ± 0.0350.915 ± 0.0360.928 ± 0.0220.966 ± 0.0120.747 ± 0.054
a

ProNEP was trained 10 times with 10 different negative samples, while the other models, excluding Alphafold3, were trained 6 times. All models, except Alphafold3, used a threshold that maximized the F1 score.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close