Table 2.

Longitudinal patterns in 4-category breast density for the AI density model and interpreting radiologists in the full cohort and in subgroups of women.

Longitudinal density patternAI density modelInterpreting radiologistsP-valuea
Full cohort (N = 61 177)
 Constant49 575 (81.0%)34 736 (56.8%)<.001
 Ascending1637 (2.7%)5065 (8.3%)
 Descending6953 (11.4%)12 021 (19.6%)
 Bi-directional3012 (4.9%)9355 (15.3%)<.001
Postmenopausal women (N = 27 268)
 Constant23 246 (85.3%)15 603 (57.2%)<.001
 Ascending733 (2.7%)2405 (8.8%)
 Descending2093 (7.7%)5018 (18.4%)
 Bi-directional1196 (4.4%)4242 (15.6%)<.001
Women with stable image-based BMI (N = 4477)
 Constant3817 (85.3%)2823 (63.1%)<.001
 Ascending104 (2.4%)356 (8.0%)
 Descending377 (8.4%)887 (19.8%)
 Bi-directional179 (5.0%)411 (9.2%)<.001
Women with examinations interpreted by the same radiologist (N = 21 216)
 Constant17 267 (81.4%)14 218 (67.0%)<.001
 Ascending584 (2.8%)1368 (6.4%)
 Descending2404 (11.3%)3734 (17.6%)
 Bi-directional961 (4.5%)1896 (8.9%)<.001
Women with examinations interpreted by fellowship-trained radiologists (N = 22 462)
 Constant19 696 (87.7%)16 122 (71.8%)<.001
 Ascending312 (6.4%)1286 (5.7%)
 Descending1446 (1.4%)1715 (7.6%)
 Bi-directional1008 (4.5%)3339 (14.9%)<.001
Longitudinal density patternAI density modelInterpreting radiologistsP-valuea
Full cohort (N = 61 177)
 Constant49 575 (81.0%)34 736 (56.8%)<.001
 Ascending1637 (2.7%)5065 (8.3%)
 Descending6953 (11.4%)12 021 (19.6%)
 Bi-directional3012 (4.9%)9355 (15.3%)<.001
Postmenopausal women (N = 27 268)
 Constant23 246 (85.3%)15 603 (57.2%)<.001
 Ascending733 (2.7%)2405 (8.8%)
 Descending2093 (7.7%)5018 (18.4%)
 Bi-directional1196 (4.4%)4242 (15.6%)<.001
Women with stable image-based BMI (N = 4477)
 Constant3817 (85.3%)2823 (63.1%)<.001
 Ascending104 (2.4%)356 (8.0%)
 Descending377 (8.4%)887 (19.8%)
 Bi-directional179 (5.0%)411 (9.2%)<.001
Women with examinations interpreted by the same radiologist (N = 21 216)
 Constant17 267 (81.4%)14 218 (67.0%)<.001
 Ascending584 (2.8%)1368 (6.4%)
 Descending2404 (11.3%)3734 (17.6%)
 Bi-directional961 (4.5%)1896 (8.9%)<.001
Women with examinations interpreted by fellowship-trained radiologists (N = 22 462)
 Constant19 696 (87.7%)16 122 (71.8%)<.001
 Ascending312 (6.4%)1286 (5.7%)
 Descending1446 (1.4%)1715 (7.6%)
 Bi-directional1008 (4.5%)3339 (14.9%)<.001

Data in parentheses are percentages.

a

P-value for paired proportion hypothesis testing between the AI density model and interpreting radiologists.

Abbreviations: AI = artificial intelligence; BMI = body mass index.

Table 2.

Longitudinal patterns in 4-category breast density for the AI density model and interpreting radiologists in the full cohort and in subgroups of women.

Longitudinal density patternAI density modelInterpreting radiologistsP-valuea
Full cohort (N = 61 177)
 Constant49 575 (81.0%)34 736 (56.8%)<.001
 Ascending1637 (2.7%)5065 (8.3%)
 Descending6953 (11.4%)12 021 (19.6%)
 Bi-directional3012 (4.9%)9355 (15.3%)<.001
Postmenopausal women (N = 27 268)
 Constant23 246 (85.3%)15 603 (57.2%)<.001
 Ascending733 (2.7%)2405 (8.8%)
 Descending2093 (7.7%)5018 (18.4%)
 Bi-directional1196 (4.4%)4242 (15.6%)<.001
Women with stable image-based BMI (N = 4477)
 Constant3817 (85.3%)2823 (63.1%)<.001
 Ascending104 (2.4%)356 (8.0%)
 Descending377 (8.4%)887 (19.8%)
 Bi-directional179 (5.0%)411 (9.2%)<.001
Women with examinations interpreted by the same radiologist (N = 21 216)
 Constant17 267 (81.4%)14 218 (67.0%)<.001
 Ascending584 (2.8%)1368 (6.4%)
 Descending2404 (11.3%)3734 (17.6%)
 Bi-directional961 (4.5%)1896 (8.9%)<.001
Women with examinations interpreted by fellowship-trained radiologists (N = 22 462)
 Constant19 696 (87.7%)16 122 (71.8%)<.001
 Ascending312 (6.4%)1286 (5.7%)
 Descending1446 (1.4%)1715 (7.6%)
 Bi-directional1008 (4.5%)3339 (14.9%)<.001
Longitudinal density patternAI density modelInterpreting radiologistsP-valuea
Full cohort (N = 61 177)
 Constant49 575 (81.0%)34 736 (56.8%)<.001
 Ascending1637 (2.7%)5065 (8.3%)
 Descending6953 (11.4%)12 021 (19.6%)
 Bi-directional3012 (4.9%)9355 (15.3%)<.001
Postmenopausal women (N = 27 268)
 Constant23 246 (85.3%)15 603 (57.2%)<.001
 Ascending733 (2.7%)2405 (8.8%)
 Descending2093 (7.7%)5018 (18.4%)
 Bi-directional1196 (4.4%)4242 (15.6%)<.001
Women with stable image-based BMI (N = 4477)
 Constant3817 (85.3%)2823 (63.1%)<.001
 Ascending104 (2.4%)356 (8.0%)
 Descending377 (8.4%)887 (19.8%)
 Bi-directional179 (5.0%)411 (9.2%)<.001
Women with examinations interpreted by the same radiologist (N = 21 216)
 Constant17 267 (81.4%)14 218 (67.0%)<.001
 Ascending584 (2.8%)1368 (6.4%)
 Descending2404 (11.3%)3734 (17.6%)
 Bi-directional961 (4.5%)1896 (8.9%)<.001
Women with examinations interpreted by fellowship-trained radiologists (N = 22 462)
 Constant19 696 (87.7%)16 122 (71.8%)<.001
 Ascending312 (6.4%)1286 (5.7%)
 Descending1446 (1.4%)1715 (7.6%)
 Bi-directional1008 (4.5%)3339 (14.9%)<.001

Data in parentheses are percentages.

a

P-value for paired proportion hypothesis testing between the AI density model and interpreting radiologists.

Abbreviations: AI = artificial intelligence; BMI = body mass index.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close