Acceptance rates for the hypothetical RCT scenarios in the 2 × 2 design (N = 406).
| EXCLU . | PAY . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A group of farmers is randomly included in or excluded from a payment scheme . | A group of farmers is randomly assigned to a higher or lower payment . | Total . | |
| LUCK | 22.55% acceptance (N = 102) | 6.06% acceptance (N = 99) | 14.43% acceptance (N = 201) |
| Respondent is framed as being among the ‘lucky’ group (allowed to participate/receives higher payment) | |||
| UNLUCK | 25.23% acceptance (N = 107) | 7.14% acceptance (N = 98) | 16.59% acceptance (N = 205) |
| Respondent is framed as being among the ‘unlucky’ group (not allowed to participate/receives lower payment) | |||
| Total | 23.92% acceptance (N = 209) | 6.60% acceptance (N = 197) | 15.52% acceptance (N = 406) |
| EXCLU . | PAY . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A group of farmers is randomly included in or excluded from a payment scheme . | A group of farmers is randomly assigned to a higher or lower payment . | Total . | |
| LUCK | 22.55% acceptance (N = 102) | 6.06% acceptance (N = 99) | 14.43% acceptance (N = 201) |
| Respondent is framed as being among the ‘lucky’ group (allowed to participate/receives higher payment) | |||
| UNLUCK | 25.23% acceptance (N = 107) | 7.14% acceptance (N = 98) | 16.59% acceptance (N = 205) |
| Respondent is framed as being among the ‘unlucky’ group (not allowed to participate/receives lower payment) | |||
| Total | 23.92% acceptance (N = 209) | 6.60% acceptance (N = 197) | 15.52% acceptance (N = 406) |
Acceptance rates for the hypothetical RCT scenarios in the 2 × 2 design (N = 406).
| EXCLU . | PAY . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A group of farmers is randomly included in or excluded from a payment scheme . | A group of farmers is randomly assigned to a higher or lower payment . | Total . | |
| LUCK | 22.55% acceptance (N = 102) | 6.06% acceptance (N = 99) | 14.43% acceptance (N = 201) |
| Respondent is framed as being among the ‘lucky’ group (allowed to participate/receives higher payment) | |||
| UNLUCK | 25.23% acceptance (N = 107) | 7.14% acceptance (N = 98) | 16.59% acceptance (N = 205) |
| Respondent is framed as being among the ‘unlucky’ group (not allowed to participate/receives lower payment) | |||
| Total | 23.92% acceptance (N = 209) | 6.60% acceptance (N = 197) | 15.52% acceptance (N = 406) |
| EXCLU . | PAY . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A group of farmers is randomly included in or excluded from a payment scheme . | A group of farmers is randomly assigned to a higher or lower payment . | Total . | |
| LUCK | 22.55% acceptance (N = 102) | 6.06% acceptance (N = 99) | 14.43% acceptance (N = 201) |
| Respondent is framed as being among the ‘lucky’ group (allowed to participate/receives higher payment) | |||
| UNLUCK | 25.23% acceptance (N = 107) | 7.14% acceptance (N = 98) | 16.59% acceptance (N = 205) |
| Respondent is framed as being among the ‘unlucky’ group (not allowed to participate/receives lower payment) | |||
| Total | 23.92% acceptance (N = 209) | 6.60% acceptance (N = 197) | 15.52% acceptance (N = 406) |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
