| Sensitivity range seta (situation) . | Gender . | |
|---|---|---|
| Men . | Women . | |
| First scenario: increasing underreporting with a constant gender difference | ||
| 1 | 0.25-0.30 | 0.35-0.40 |
| 2 | 0.35-0.40 | 0.45-0.50 |
| 3 | 0.45-0.50 | 0.55-0.60 |
| 4 | 0.55-0.60 | 0.65-0.70 |
| 5 | 0.65-0.70 | 0.75-0.80 |
| 6 | 0.75-0.80 | 0.85-0.90 |
| 7 | 0.85-0.90 | 0.95-1.00 |
| Second scenario: increasing underreporting in women, constant underreporting in men | ||
| 1 | 0.30-0.35 | 0.30-0.35 |
| 2 | 0.40-0.45 | |
| 3 | 0.50-0.55 | |
| 4 | 0.60-0.65 | |
| 5 | 0.70-0.75 | |
| 6 | 0.80-0.85 | |
| 7 | 0.90-0.95 | |
| Third scenario: increasing underreporting in men, constant underreporting in women | ||
| 1 | 0.25-0.30 | 0.95-1.00 |
| 2 | 0.35-0.40 | |
| 3 | 0.45-0.50 | |
| 4 | 0.55-0.60 | |
| 5 | 0.65-0.70 | |
| 6 | 0.75-0.80 | |
| 7 | 0.85-0.90 | |
| Sensitivity range seta (situation) . | Gender . | |
|---|---|---|
| Men . | Women . | |
| First scenario: increasing underreporting with a constant gender difference | ||
| 1 | 0.25-0.30 | 0.35-0.40 |
| 2 | 0.35-0.40 | 0.45-0.50 |
| 3 | 0.45-0.50 | 0.55-0.60 |
| 4 | 0.55-0.60 | 0.65-0.70 |
| 5 | 0.65-0.70 | 0.75-0.80 |
| 6 | 0.75-0.80 | 0.85-0.90 |
| 7 | 0.85-0.90 | 0.95-1.00 |
| Second scenario: increasing underreporting in women, constant underreporting in men | ||
| 1 | 0.30-0.35 | 0.30-0.35 |
| 2 | 0.40-0.45 | |
| 3 | 0.50-0.55 | |
| 4 | 0.60-0.65 | |
| 5 | 0.70-0.75 | |
| 6 | 0.80-0.85 | |
| 7 | 0.90-0.95 | |
| Third scenario: increasing underreporting in men, constant underreporting in women | ||
| 1 | 0.25-0.30 | 0.95-1.00 |
| 2 | 0.35-0.40 | |
| 3 | 0.45-0.50 | |
| 4 | 0.55-0.60 | |
| 5 | 0.65-0.70 | |
| 6 | 0.75-0.80 | |
| 7 | 0.85-0.90 | |
a For each sensitivity range set, specificity values were constantly set as 0.92-1.00.
| Sensitivity range seta (situation) . | Gender . | |
|---|---|---|
| Men . | Women . | |
| First scenario: increasing underreporting with a constant gender difference | ||
| 1 | 0.25-0.30 | 0.35-0.40 |
| 2 | 0.35-0.40 | 0.45-0.50 |
| 3 | 0.45-0.50 | 0.55-0.60 |
| 4 | 0.55-0.60 | 0.65-0.70 |
| 5 | 0.65-0.70 | 0.75-0.80 |
| 6 | 0.75-0.80 | 0.85-0.90 |
| 7 | 0.85-0.90 | 0.95-1.00 |
| Second scenario: increasing underreporting in women, constant underreporting in men | ||
| 1 | 0.30-0.35 | 0.30-0.35 |
| 2 | 0.40-0.45 | |
| 3 | 0.50-0.55 | |
| 4 | 0.60-0.65 | |
| 5 | 0.70-0.75 | |
| 6 | 0.80-0.85 | |
| 7 | 0.90-0.95 | |
| Third scenario: increasing underreporting in men, constant underreporting in women | ||
| 1 | 0.25-0.30 | 0.95-1.00 |
| 2 | 0.35-0.40 | |
| 3 | 0.45-0.50 | |
| 4 | 0.55-0.60 | |
| 5 | 0.65-0.70 | |
| 6 | 0.75-0.80 | |
| 7 | 0.85-0.90 | |
| Sensitivity range seta (situation) . | Gender . | |
|---|---|---|
| Men . | Women . | |
| First scenario: increasing underreporting with a constant gender difference | ||
| 1 | 0.25-0.30 | 0.35-0.40 |
| 2 | 0.35-0.40 | 0.45-0.50 |
| 3 | 0.45-0.50 | 0.55-0.60 |
| 4 | 0.55-0.60 | 0.65-0.70 |
| 5 | 0.65-0.70 | 0.75-0.80 |
| 6 | 0.75-0.80 | 0.85-0.90 |
| 7 | 0.85-0.90 | 0.95-1.00 |
| Second scenario: increasing underreporting in women, constant underreporting in men | ||
| 1 | 0.30-0.35 | 0.30-0.35 |
| 2 | 0.40-0.45 | |
| 3 | 0.50-0.55 | |
| 4 | 0.60-0.65 | |
| 5 | 0.70-0.75 | |
| 6 | 0.80-0.85 | |
| 7 | 0.90-0.95 | |
| Third scenario: increasing underreporting in men, constant underreporting in women | ||
| 1 | 0.25-0.30 | 0.95-1.00 |
| 2 | 0.35-0.40 | |
| 3 | 0.45-0.50 | |
| 4 | 0.55-0.60 | |
| 5 | 0.65-0.70 | |
| 6 | 0.75-0.80 | |
| 7 | 0.85-0.90 | |
a For each sensitivity range set, specificity values were constantly set as 0.92-1.00.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
