| . | Australia . | Hong Kong . | United Kingdom . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Country profiles | Strong orientation to application and economic fields. Policy and media logics are balanced. High-scoring cases use more field logic vocabulary (except media). | Dominance of economic and policy logics. Application is less prominent. High-scoring cases focus more on policy and media, with reduced emphasis on application and economic.a | Balanced use of field logics; application dominates, with even representation of policy, economic, and media. Low-scoring cases use more field logic vocabulary. |
| Discipline profiles | Application is dominant across all disciplines. Economic logic is strongest in STEM fields (e.g. physical sciences and engineering). Policy is prominent in social sciences and humanities. | Application is strong but less dominant than in AU and UK. Economic logic is highly emphasized across STEM fields. Social sciences favour policy and economic logics. | Application logic is universal across disciplines. Social sciences favour policy and media, while STEM disciplines focus on economic and application logics. |
| University profiles | Less academically productive universities emphasize economic and policy logics. High-scoring cases show stronger application impacts across all university groups. | Stronger emphasis on economic logic among more productive universities. High-scoring cases in less productive universities display more diversity in policy and application logics. | Application logic is consistently emphasized across all university groupings. Less productive universities rely on broader and more generic field logic vocabulary. |
| . | Australia . | Hong Kong . | United Kingdom . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Country profiles | Strong orientation to application and economic fields. Policy and media logics are balanced. High-scoring cases use more field logic vocabulary (except media). | Dominance of economic and policy logics. Application is less prominent. High-scoring cases focus more on policy and media, with reduced emphasis on application and economic.a | Balanced use of field logics; application dominates, with even representation of policy, economic, and media. Low-scoring cases use more field logic vocabulary. |
| Discipline profiles | Application is dominant across all disciplines. Economic logic is strongest in STEM fields (e.g. physical sciences and engineering). Policy is prominent in social sciences and humanities. | Application is strong but less dominant than in AU and UK. Economic logic is highly emphasized across STEM fields. Social sciences favour policy and economic logics. | Application logic is universal across disciplines. Social sciences favour policy and media, while STEM disciplines focus on economic and application logics. |
| University profiles | Less academically productive universities emphasize economic and policy logics. High-scoring cases show stronger application impacts across all university groups. | Stronger emphasis on economic logic among more productive universities. High-scoring cases in less productive universities display more diversity in policy and application logics. | Application logic is consistently emphasized across all university groupings. Less productive universities rely on broader and more generic field logic vocabulary. |
Despite inconsistency in the prevalence of policy logic between the quantitative and qualitative analysis, in this summary we have worked from the quantitative results given the broader scope of the policy field given by the embeddings approach.
| . | Australia . | Hong Kong . | United Kingdom . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Country profiles | Strong orientation to application and economic fields. Policy and media logics are balanced. High-scoring cases use more field logic vocabulary (except media). | Dominance of economic and policy logics. Application is less prominent. High-scoring cases focus more on policy and media, with reduced emphasis on application and economic.a | Balanced use of field logics; application dominates, with even representation of policy, economic, and media. Low-scoring cases use more field logic vocabulary. |
| Discipline profiles | Application is dominant across all disciplines. Economic logic is strongest in STEM fields (e.g. physical sciences and engineering). Policy is prominent in social sciences and humanities. | Application is strong but less dominant than in AU and UK. Economic logic is highly emphasized across STEM fields. Social sciences favour policy and economic logics. | Application logic is universal across disciplines. Social sciences favour policy and media, while STEM disciplines focus on economic and application logics. |
| University profiles | Less academically productive universities emphasize economic and policy logics. High-scoring cases show stronger application impacts across all university groups. | Stronger emphasis on economic logic among more productive universities. High-scoring cases in less productive universities display more diversity in policy and application logics. | Application logic is consistently emphasized across all university groupings. Less productive universities rely on broader and more generic field logic vocabulary. |
| . | Australia . | Hong Kong . | United Kingdom . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Country profiles | Strong orientation to application and economic fields. Policy and media logics are balanced. High-scoring cases use more field logic vocabulary (except media). | Dominance of economic and policy logics. Application is less prominent. High-scoring cases focus more on policy and media, with reduced emphasis on application and economic.a | Balanced use of field logics; application dominates, with even representation of policy, economic, and media. Low-scoring cases use more field logic vocabulary. |
| Discipline profiles | Application is dominant across all disciplines. Economic logic is strongest in STEM fields (e.g. physical sciences and engineering). Policy is prominent in social sciences and humanities. | Application is strong but less dominant than in AU and UK. Economic logic is highly emphasized across STEM fields. Social sciences favour policy and economic logics. | Application logic is universal across disciplines. Social sciences favour policy and media, while STEM disciplines focus on economic and application logics. |
| University profiles | Less academically productive universities emphasize economic and policy logics. High-scoring cases show stronger application impacts across all university groups. | Stronger emphasis on economic logic among more productive universities. High-scoring cases in less productive universities display more diversity in policy and application logics. | Application logic is consistently emphasized across all university groupings. Less productive universities rely on broader and more generic field logic vocabulary. |
Despite inconsistency in the prevalence of policy logic between the quantitative and qualitative analysis, in this summary we have worked from the quantitative results given the broader scope of the policy field given by the embeddings approach.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
