Differences in adoption of WHO ExpandNet recommended dissemination channels and strategies, prior to and during scale-up
| Prior to scale-up; N (%) . | During scale-up; N (%) . | P . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dissemination channels | Max n = 58 | Max n = 58 | |
| Policy makers | 42 (72) | 38 (66) | 0.28 |
| NGOs or community-based organizations | 30 (52) | 42 (72) | 0.004 |
| Organizations or settings who would deliver the intervention | 42 (72) | 51 (88) | 0.04 |
| Community members/advocacy groups | 20 (35) | 36 (62) | 0.001 |
| Target recipients (i.e. end users) of the initiative | 28 (48) | 44 (76) | 0.002 |
| Other | 5 (9) | 4 (7) | 0.65 |
| Dissemination strategies | Max n = 55 | Max n = 55 | |
| Messages were tailored and used a format for each audience | 38 (69) | 48 (81) | 0.16 |
| Data were presented clearly, concisely, and in a timely manner, so that it was relevant and useable | 43 (78) | 50 (85) | 0.41 |
| Repeated messages integrated into established communication networks of user organizations | 30 (56) | 45 (76) | 0.03 |
| Barriers to effective communication were recognized, communication/marketing specialists used | 26 (47) | 37 (63) | 0.11 |
| Other | 5 (9) | 2 (3) | 0.16 |
| Strategies to enhance scale-up in user organizations | Max n = 59 | ||
| Providing resources to support implementation (e.g. information packs, toolkits) | 54 (92) | ||
| Providing face-to-face training of target organizations and employees | 51 (86) | ||
| Newsletters with information on intervention and/or implementation experiences | 43 (73) | ||
| Monitoring and providing feedback to organizations on implementation performance | 42 (71) | ||
| Using online networks to communicate or support local implementation efforts | 38 (64) | ||
| Remote or online technical assistance/support services | 34 (58) | ||
| Providing online training of target organizations and employees | 32 (54) | ||
| Other | 4 (7) | ||
| Prior to scale-up; N (%) . | During scale-up; N (%) . | P . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dissemination channels | Max n = 58 | Max n = 58 | |
| Policy makers | 42 (72) | 38 (66) | 0.28 |
| NGOs or community-based organizations | 30 (52) | 42 (72) | 0.004 |
| Organizations or settings who would deliver the intervention | 42 (72) | 51 (88) | 0.04 |
| Community members/advocacy groups | 20 (35) | 36 (62) | 0.001 |
| Target recipients (i.e. end users) of the initiative | 28 (48) | 44 (76) | 0.002 |
| Other | 5 (9) | 4 (7) | 0.65 |
| Dissemination strategies | Max n = 55 | Max n = 55 | |
| Messages were tailored and used a format for each audience | 38 (69) | 48 (81) | 0.16 |
| Data were presented clearly, concisely, and in a timely manner, so that it was relevant and useable | 43 (78) | 50 (85) | 0.41 |
| Repeated messages integrated into established communication networks of user organizations | 30 (56) | 45 (76) | 0.03 |
| Barriers to effective communication were recognized, communication/marketing specialists used | 26 (47) | 37 (63) | 0.11 |
| Other | 5 (9) | 2 (3) | 0.16 |
| Strategies to enhance scale-up in user organizations | Max n = 59 | ||
| Providing resources to support implementation (e.g. information packs, toolkits) | 54 (92) | ||
| Providing face-to-face training of target organizations and employees | 51 (86) | ||
| Newsletters with information on intervention and/or implementation experiences | 43 (73) | ||
| Monitoring and providing feedback to organizations on implementation performance | 42 (71) | ||
| Using online networks to communicate or support local implementation efforts | 38 (64) | ||
| Remote or online technical assistance/support services | 34 (58) | ||
| Providing online training of target organizations and employees | 32 (54) | ||
| Other | 4 (7) | ||
McNemar test used to assess differences in proportions for dissemination channels and strategies, prior to and during scale-up.
Differences in adoption of WHO ExpandNet recommended dissemination channels and strategies, prior to and during scale-up
| Prior to scale-up; N (%) . | During scale-up; N (%) . | P . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dissemination channels | Max n = 58 | Max n = 58 | |
| Policy makers | 42 (72) | 38 (66) | 0.28 |
| NGOs or community-based organizations | 30 (52) | 42 (72) | 0.004 |
| Organizations or settings who would deliver the intervention | 42 (72) | 51 (88) | 0.04 |
| Community members/advocacy groups | 20 (35) | 36 (62) | 0.001 |
| Target recipients (i.e. end users) of the initiative | 28 (48) | 44 (76) | 0.002 |
| Other | 5 (9) | 4 (7) | 0.65 |
| Dissemination strategies | Max n = 55 | Max n = 55 | |
| Messages were tailored and used a format for each audience | 38 (69) | 48 (81) | 0.16 |
| Data were presented clearly, concisely, and in a timely manner, so that it was relevant and useable | 43 (78) | 50 (85) | 0.41 |
| Repeated messages integrated into established communication networks of user organizations | 30 (56) | 45 (76) | 0.03 |
| Barriers to effective communication were recognized, communication/marketing specialists used | 26 (47) | 37 (63) | 0.11 |
| Other | 5 (9) | 2 (3) | 0.16 |
| Strategies to enhance scale-up in user organizations | Max n = 59 | ||
| Providing resources to support implementation (e.g. information packs, toolkits) | 54 (92) | ||
| Providing face-to-face training of target organizations and employees | 51 (86) | ||
| Newsletters with information on intervention and/or implementation experiences | 43 (73) | ||
| Monitoring and providing feedback to organizations on implementation performance | 42 (71) | ||
| Using online networks to communicate or support local implementation efforts | 38 (64) | ||
| Remote or online technical assistance/support services | 34 (58) | ||
| Providing online training of target organizations and employees | 32 (54) | ||
| Other | 4 (7) | ||
| Prior to scale-up; N (%) . | During scale-up; N (%) . | P . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dissemination channels | Max n = 58 | Max n = 58 | |
| Policy makers | 42 (72) | 38 (66) | 0.28 |
| NGOs or community-based organizations | 30 (52) | 42 (72) | 0.004 |
| Organizations or settings who would deliver the intervention | 42 (72) | 51 (88) | 0.04 |
| Community members/advocacy groups | 20 (35) | 36 (62) | 0.001 |
| Target recipients (i.e. end users) of the initiative | 28 (48) | 44 (76) | 0.002 |
| Other | 5 (9) | 4 (7) | 0.65 |
| Dissemination strategies | Max n = 55 | Max n = 55 | |
| Messages were tailored and used a format for each audience | 38 (69) | 48 (81) | 0.16 |
| Data were presented clearly, concisely, and in a timely manner, so that it was relevant and useable | 43 (78) | 50 (85) | 0.41 |
| Repeated messages integrated into established communication networks of user organizations | 30 (56) | 45 (76) | 0.03 |
| Barriers to effective communication were recognized, communication/marketing specialists used | 26 (47) | 37 (63) | 0.11 |
| Other | 5 (9) | 2 (3) | 0.16 |
| Strategies to enhance scale-up in user organizations | Max n = 59 | ||
| Providing resources to support implementation (e.g. information packs, toolkits) | 54 (92) | ||
| Providing face-to-face training of target organizations and employees | 51 (86) | ||
| Newsletters with information on intervention and/or implementation experiences | 43 (73) | ||
| Monitoring and providing feedback to organizations on implementation performance | 42 (71) | ||
| Using online networks to communicate or support local implementation efforts | 38 (64) | ||
| Remote or online technical assistance/support services | 34 (58) | ||
| Providing online training of target organizations and employees | 32 (54) | ||
| Other | 4 (7) | ||
McNemar test used to assess differences in proportions for dissemination channels and strategies, prior to and during scale-up.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
