TABLE 3.

Model-averaged estimates from the models examining the association between the song parameters of A. paludicola males and their quality-related traits. The response variables and the continuous explanatory variables were standardized to a mean of zero and SD of 0.5. CI, 95% confidence interval. The predictors with the CIs not spanning zero are marked in bold.

ParameterEstimate (CI)Relative importance
Response variable: Repertoire size
Wing length0.04 (−0.36, 0.44)0.13
Inbreeding coefficient0.15 (−0.24, 0.55)0.18
Scaled mass index0.42 (0.03, 0.80)0.72
Trypanosoma infection0.18 (−0.31, 0.67)0.18
Plasmodium infection0.13 (−0.35, 0.61)0.16
Response variable: Song duty cycle
Wing length−0.01 (−0.41, 0.42)0.17
Inbreeding coefficient−0.02 (−0.43, 0.40)0.17
Scaled mass index−0.22 (−0.63, 0.19)0.30
Trypanosoma infection0.25 (−0.26, 0.77)0.26
Plasmodium infection0.03 (−0.45, 0.51)0.17
Response variable: A-song rate
Wing length−0.04 (−0.43, 0.35)0.09
Inbreeding coefficient−0.05 (−0.44, 0.33)0.09
Scaled mass index−0.33 (−0.72, 0.05)0.46
Trypanosoma infection0.15 (−0.36, 0.63)0.10
Plasmodium infection0.58 (0.15, 1.02)0.90
ParameterEstimate (CI)Relative importance
Response variable: Repertoire size
Wing length0.04 (−0.36, 0.44)0.13
Inbreeding coefficient0.15 (−0.24, 0.55)0.18
Scaled mass index0.42 (0.03, 0.80)0.72
Trypanosoma infection0.18 (−0.31, 0.67)0.18
Plasmodium infection0.13 (−0.35, 0.61)0.16
Response variable: Song duty cycle
Wing length−0.01 (−0.41, 0.42)0.17
Inbreeding coefficient−0.02 (−0.43, 0.40)0.17
Scaled mass index−0.22 (−0.63, 0.19)0.30
Trypanosoma infection0.25 (−0.26, 0.77)0.26
Plasmodium infection0.03 (−0.45, 0.51)0.17
Response variable: A-song rate
Wing length−0.04 (−0.43, 0.35)0.09
Inbreeding coefficient−0.05 (−0.44, 0.33)0.09
Scaled mass index−0.33 (−0.72, 0.05)0.46
Trypanosoma infection0.15 (−0.36, 0.63)0.10
Plasmodium infection0.58 (0.15, 1.02)0.90
TABLE 3.

Model-averaged estimates from the models examining the association between the song parameters of A. paludicola males and their quality-related traits. The response variables and the continuous explanatory variables were standardized to a mean of zero and SD of 0.5. CI, 95% confidence interval. The predictors with the CIs not spanning zero are marked in bold.

ParameterEstimate (CI)Relative importance
Response variable: Repertoire size
Wing length0.04 (−0.36, 0.44)0.13
Inbreeding coefficient0.15 (−0.24, 0.55)0.18
Scaled mass index0.42 (0.03, 0.80)0.72
Trypanosoma infection0.18 (−0.31, 0.67)0.18
Plasmodium infection0.13 (−0.35, 0.61)0.16
Response variable: Song duty cycle
Wing length−0.01 (−0.41, 0.42)0.17
Inbreeding coefficient−0.02 (−0.43, 0.40)0.17
Scaled mass index−0.22 (−0.63, 0.19)0.30
Trypanosoma infection0.25 (−0.26, 0.77)0.26
Plasmodium infection0.03 (−0.45, 0.51)0.17
Response variable: A-song rate
Wing length−0.04 (−0.43, 0.35)0.09
Inbreeding coefficient−0.05 (−0.44, 0.33)0.09
Scaled mass index−0.33 (−0.72, 0.05)0.46
Trypanosoma infection0.15 (−0.36, 0.63)0.10
Plasmodium infection0.58 (0.15, 1.02)0.90
ParameterEstimate (CI)Relative importance
Response variable: Repertoire size
Wing length0.04 (−0.36, 0.44)0.13
Inbreeding coefficient0.15 (−0.24, 0.55)0.18
Scaled mass index0.42 (0.03, 0.80)0.72
Trypanosoma infection0.18 (−0.31, 0.67)0.18
Plasmodium infection0.13 (−0.35, 0.61)0.16
Response variable: Song duty cycle
Wing length−0.01 (−0.41, 0.42)0.17
Inbreeding coefficient−0.02 (−0.43, 0.40)0.17
Scaled mass index−0.22 (−0.63, 0.19)0.30
Trypanosoma infection0.25 (−0.26, 0.77)0.26
Plasmodium infection0.03 (−0.45, 0.51)0.17
Response variable: A-song rate
Wing length−0.04 (−0.43, 0.35)0.09
Inbreeding coefficient−0.05 (−0.44, 0.33)0.09
Scaled mass index−0.33 (−0.72, 0.05)0.46
Trypanosoma infection0.15 (−0.36, 0.63)0.10
Plasmodium infection0.58 (0.15, 1.02)0.90
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close