Model-averaged estimates of the statistical effect of the song features of A. paludicola males on the change in tarsus length and in scaled mass index of their chicks sired in the study area, between days 2 and 9 post-hatch. The predictors and the response variables were z-score transformed. CI, 95% confidence interval.
| Parameter . | Estimate (CI) . | Relative importance . |
|---|---|---|
| Response variable: Change in chick tarsus length | ||
| A-song rate | 0.37 (−0.07, 0.80) | 0.42 |
| Song duty cycle (%) | 0.26 (−0.11, 0.62) | 0.32 |
| Repertoire size | −0.20 (−0.54, 0.14) | 0.23 |
| Brood size | −0.32 (−0.65, 0.02) | 0.41 |
| Response variable: Change in chick scaled mass index | ||
| A-song rate | −0.51 (−1.05, 0.03) | 0.49 |
| Song duty cycle (%) | −0.31 (−0.72, 0.10) | 0.41 |
| Repertoire size | 0.30 (−0.10, 0.70) | 0.21 |
| Brood size | 0.07 (−0.30, 0.44) | 0.14 |
| Parameter . | Estimate (CI) . | Relative importance . |
|---|---|---|
| Response variable: Change in chick tarsus length | ||
| A-song rate | 0.37 (−0.07, 0.80) | 0.42 |
| Song duty cycle (%) | 0.26 (−0.11, 0.62) | 0.32 |
| Repertoire size | −0.20 (−0.54, 0.14) | 0.23 |
| Brood size | −0.32 (−0.65, 0.02) | 0.41 |
| Response variable: Change in chick scaled mass index | ||
| A-song rate | −0.51 (−1.05, 0.03) | 0.49 |
| Song duty cycle (%) | −0.31 (−0.72, 0.10) | 0.41 |
| Repertoire size | 0.30 (−0.10, 0.70) | 0.21 |
| Brood size | 0.07 (−0.30, 0.44) | 0.14 |
Model-averaged estimates of the statistical effect of the song features of A. paludicola males on the change in tarsus length and in scaled mass index of their chicks sired in the study area, between days 2 and 9 post-hatch. The predictors and the response variables were z-score transformed. CI, 95% confidence interval.
| Parameter . | Estimate (CI) . | Relative importance . |
|---|---|---|
| Response variable: Change in chick tarsus length | ||
| A-song rate | 0.37 (−0.07, 0.80) | 0.42 |
| Song duty cycle (%) | 0.26 (−0.11, 0.62) | 0.32 |
| Repertoire size | −0.20 (−0.54, 0.14) | 0.23 |
| Brood size | −0.32 (−0.65, 0.02) | 0.41 |
| Response variable: Change in chick scaled mass index | ||
| A-song rate | −0.51 (−1.05, 0.03) | 0.49 |
| Song duty cycle (%) | −0.31 (−0.72, 0.10) | 0.41 |
| Repertoire size | 0.30 (−0.10, 0.70) | 0.21 |
| Brood size | 0.07 (−0.30, 0.44) | 0.14 |
| Parameter . | Estimate (CI) . | Relative importance . |
|---|---|---|
| Response variable: Change in chick tarsus length | ||
| A-song rate | 0.37 (−0.07, 0.80) | 0.42 |
| Song duty cycle (%) | 0.26 (−0.11, 0.62) | 0.32 |
| Repertoire size | −0.20 (−0.54, 0.14) | 0.23 |
| Brood size | −0.32 (−0.65, 0.02) | 0.41 |
| Response variable: Change in chick scaled mass index | ||
| A-song rate | −0.51 (−1.05, 0.03) | 0.49 |
| Song duty cycle (%) | −0.31 (−0.72, 0.10) | 0.41 |
| Repertoire size | 0.30 (−0.10, 0.70) | 0.21 |
| Brood size | 0.07 (−0.30, 0.44) | 0.14 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
