Table 2.

A summary of the main approaches adopted in empirical PPI research.

Data sourcesCase studyFirm-level surveysAdministrative data
Procurement captured through …Public procurement projectsFirm participation in public sector contractsTender, contract award notice, and procurement expenditure
Public procurement and innovation (PPI) distinguished by …Not clear—although the complexity of the products or services being purchased sometimes suggests a departure from regular procurementAsking if public contracts required innovationText analysis of notices (especially description of procurement objectives) to identify the expression of innovation concepts
Impact is understood as …Cost-savings, better knowledge co-creation, innovation adoption, and improved organizational practicesFirm turnover and introduction/adoption of product, process, or environmental innovationInnovation adoption, SME participation, private R&D expenditure, and patents
AdvantagesIn-depth analysis of the conditions and policy decisions affecting PPI implementationsimple and direct instrument, extensively piloted and reliable, and accessibleInformation at the level of contracts; identify different procurement practices, contract design, and qualitative aspects of contracts; and differentiate procurement by regions or economic sectors
LimitationsContext-specific, lack of generalizabilityAnonymised, lacks information on the size of government support, self-identification can create variability, difficult to find large panels to analyse medium- and long-term impacts of procurement, and lacks information of regional/ local procurementresource-intensive (volume of data requires sampling or automated analysis) and challenges in linking notices (intentions) with outcomes
Data sourcesCase studyFirm-level surveysAdministrative data
Procurement captured through …Public procurement projectsFirm participation in public sector contractsTender, contract award notice, and procurement expenditure
Public procurement and innovation (PPI) distinguished by …Not clear—although the complexity of the products or services being purchased sometimes suggests a departure from regular procurementAsking if public contracts required innovationText analysis of notices (especially description of procurement objectives) to identify the expression of innovation concepts
Impact is understood as …Cost-savings, better knowledge co-creation, innovation adoption, and improved organizational practicesFirm turnover and introduction/adoption of product, process, or environmental innovationInnovation adoption, SME participation, private R&D expenditure, and patents
AdvantagesIn-depth analysis of the conditions and policy decisions affecting PPI implementationsimple and direct instrument, extensively piloted and reliable, and accessibleInformation at the level of contracts; identify different procurement practices, contract design, and qualitative aspects of contracts; and differentiate procurement by regions or economic sectors
LimitationsContext-specific, lack of generalizabilityAnonymised, lacks information on the size of government support, self-identification can create variability, difficult to find large panels to analyse medium- and long-term impacts of procurement, and lacks information of regional/ local procurementresource-intensive (volume of data requires sampling or automated analysis) and challenges in linking notices (intentions) with outcomes
Table 2.

A summary of the main approaches adopted in empirical PPI research.

Data sourcesCase studyFirm-level surveysAdministrative data
Procurement captured through …Public procurement projectsFirm participation in public sector contractsTender, contract award notice, and procurement expenditure
Public procurement and innovation (PPI) distinguished by …Not clear—although the complexity of the products or services being purchased sometimes suggests a departure from regular procurementAsking if public contracts required innovationText analysis of notices (especially description of procurement objectives) to identify the expression of innovation concepts
Impact is understood as …Cost-savings, better knowledge co-creation, innovation adoption, and improved organizational practicesFirm turnover and introduction/adoption of product, process, or environmental innovationInnovation adoption, SME participation, private R&D expenditure, and patents
AdvantagesIn-depth analysis of the conditions and policy decisions affecting PPI implementationsimple and direct instrument, extensively piloted and reliable, and accessibleInformation at the level of contracts; identify different procurement practices, contract design, and qualitative aspects of contracts; and differentiate procurement by regions or economic sectors
LimitationsContext-specific, lack of generalizabilityAnonymised, lacks information on the size of government support, self-identification can create variability, difficult to find large panels to analyse medium- and long-term impacts of procurement, and lacks information of regional/ local procurementresource-intensive (volume of data requires sampling or automated analysis) and challenges in linking notices (intentions) with outcomes
Data sourcesCase studyFirm-level surveysAdministrative data
Procurement captured through …Public procurement projectsFirm participation in public sector contractsTender, contract award notice, and procurement expenditure
Public procurement and innovation (PPI) distinguished by …Not clear—although the complexity of the products or services being purchased sometimes suggests a departure from regular procurementAsking if public contracts required innovationText analysis of notices (especially description of procurement objectives) to identify the expression of innovation concepts
Impact is understood as …Cost-savings, better knowledge co-creation, innovation adoption, and improved organizational practicesFirm turnover and introduction/adoption of product, process, or environmental innovationInnovation adoption, SME participation, private R&D expenditure, and patents
AdvantagesIn-depth analysis of the conditions and policy decisions affecting PPI implementationsimple and direct instrument, extensively piloted and reliable, and accessibleInformation at the level of contracts; identify different procurement practices, contract design, and qualitative aspects of contracts; and differentiate procurement by regions or economic sectors
LimitationsContext-specific, lack of generalizabilityAnonymised, lacks information on the size of government support, self-identification can create variability, difficult to find large panels to analyse medium- and long-term impacts of procurement, and lacks information of regional/ local procurementresource-intensive (volume of data requires sampling or automated analysis) and challenges in linking notices (intentions) with outcomes
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close