Data sources . | Case study . | Firm-level surveys . | Administrative data . |
---|---|---|---|
Procurement captured through … | Public procurement projects | Firm participation in public sector contracts | Tender, contract award notice, and procurement expenditure |
Public procurement and innovation (PPI) distinguished by … | Not clear—although the complexity of the products or services being purchased sometimes suggests a departure from regular procurement | Asking if public contracts required innovation | Text analysis of notices (especially description of procurement objectives) to identify the expression of innovation concepts |
Impact is understood as … | Cost-savings, better knowledge co-creation, innovation adoption, and improved organizational practices | Firm turnover and introduction/adoption of product, process, or environmental innovation | Innovation adoption, SME participation, private R&D expenditure, and patents |
Advantages | In-depth analysis of the conditions and policy decisions affecting PPI implementation | simple and direct instrument, extensively piloted and reliable, and accessible | Information at the level of contracts; identify different procurement practices, contract design, and qualitative aspects of contracts; and differentiate procurement by regions or economic sectors |
Limitations | Context-specific, lack of generalizability | Anonymised, lacks information on the size of government support, self-identification can create variability, difficult to find large panels to analyse medium- and long-term impacts of procurement, and lacks information of regional/ local procurement | resource-intensive (volume of data requires sampling or automated analysis) and challenges in linking notices (intentions) with outcomes |
Data sources . | Case study . | Firm-level surveys . | Administrative data . |
---|---|---|---|
Procurement captured through … | Public procurement projects | Firm participation in public sector contracts | Tender, contract award notice, and procurement expenditure |
Public procurement and innovation (PPI) distinguished by … | Not clear—although the complexity of the products or services being purchased sometimes suggests a departure from regular procurement | Asking if public contracts required innovation | Text analysis of notices (especially description of procurement objectives) to identify the expression of innovation concepts |
Impact is understood as … | Cost-savings, better knowledge co-creation, innovation adoption, and improved organizational practices | Firm turnover and introduction/adoption of product, process, or environmental innovation | Innovation adoption, SME participation, private R&D expenditure, and patents |
Advantages | In-depth analysis of the conditions and policy decisions affecting PPI implementation | simple and direct instrument, extensively piloted and reliable, and accessible | Information at the level of contracts; identify different procurement practices, contract design, and qualitative aspects of contracts; and differentiate procurement by regions or economic sectors |
Limitations | Context-specific, lack of generalizability | Anonymised, lacks information on the size of government support, self-identification can create variability, difficult to find large panels to analyse medium- and long-term impacts of procurement, and lacks information of regional/ local procurement | resource-intensive (volume of data requires sampling or automated analysis) and challenges in linking notices (intentions) with outcomes |
Data sources . | Case study . | Firm-level surveys . | Administrative data . |
---|---|---|---|
Procurement captured through … | Public procurement projects | Firm participation in public sector contracts | Tender, contract award notice, and procurement expenditure |
Public procurement and innovation (PPI) distinguished by … | Not clear—although the complexity of the products or services being purchased sometimes suggests a departure from regular procurement | Asking if public contracts required innovation | Text analysis of notices (especially description of procurement objectives) to identify the expression of innovation concepts |
Impact is understood as … | Cost-savings, better knowledge co-creation, innovation adoption, and improved organizational practices | Firm turnover and introduction/adoption of product, process, or environmental innovation | Innovation adoption, SME participation, private R&D expenditure, and patents |
Advantages | In-depth analysis of the conditions and policy decisions affecting PPI implementation | simple and direct instrument, extensively piloted and reliable, and accessible | Information at the level of contracts; identify different procurement practices, contract design, and qualitative aspects of contracts; and differentiate procurement by regions or economic sectors |
Limitations | Context-specific, lack of generalizability | Anonymised, lacks information on the size of government support, self-identification can create variability, difficult to find large panels to analyse medium- and long-term impacts of procurement, and lacks information of regional/ local procurement | resource-intensive (volume of data requires sampling or automated analysis) and challenges in linking notices (intentions) with outcomes |
Data sources . | Case study . | Firm-level surveys . | Administrative data . |
---|---|---|---|
Procurement captured through … | Public procurement projects | Firm participation in public sector contracts | Tender, contract award notice, and procurement expenditure |
Public procurement and innovation (PPI) distinguished by … | Not clear—although the complexity of the products or services being purchased sometimes suggests a departure from regular procurement | Asking if public contracts required innovation | Text analysis of notices (especially description of procurement objectives) to identify the expression of innovation concepts |
Impact is understood as … | Cost-savings, better knowledge co-creation, innovation adoption, and improved organizational practices | Firm turnover and introduction/adoption of product, process, or environmental innovation | Innovation adoption, SME participation, private R&D expenditure, and patents |
Advantages | In-depth analysis of the conditions and policy decisions affecting PPI implementation | simple and direct instrument, extensively piloted and reliable, and accessible | Information at the level of contracts; identify different procurement practices, contract design, and qualitative aspects of contracts; and differentiate procurement by regions or economic sectors |
Limitations | Context-specific, lack of generalizability | Anonymised, lacks information on the size of government support, self-identification can create variability, difficult to find large panels to analyse medium- and long-term impacts of procurement, and lacks information of regional/ local procurement | resource-intensive (volume of data requires sampling or automated analysis) and challenges in linking notices (intentions) with outcomes |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.