Table 3.

Effect of the Labor Law Reform in 2015 on School Enrollment and Employment

Dependent variable:SchoolHoursExtensiveIntensive
 enrollmentworkedmarginmargin
 IIIIIIIV
A. Baseline effects—equation (1)
I. By gender
Effect of labor law 20150.036***−1.865***−0.036***−1.938***
(0.006)(0.251)(0.007)(0.725)
Male−0.017***2.630***0.090***3.283***
(0.004)(0.294)(0.007)(0.432)
Male × labor law 2015−0.027***2.167***0.047***1.478**
(0.008)(0.416)(0.009)(0.658)
Mean (girls)0.9580.8500.04718.126
Mean (boys)0.9502.4320.113221.557
Observations123,487123,487123,48715,911
B. Individual fixed effects—equation (2)
I. Full sample
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.028***−0.733***−0.020**−0.486
(0.005)(0.267)(0.009)(1.519)
Mean0.9322.4240.10323.516
Observations23,56223,56223,5623,035
II. Children working pre-reform
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.047***−1.713−0.075**−0.471
(0.016)(1.110)(0.036)(1.534)
Mean0.81412.5560.53423.516
Observations4,1554,1554,1552,121
III. Children not working pre-reform
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.022***−0.721***−0.017**
(0.005)(0.213)(0.007)
Mean0.960
Observations19,40719,40719,407914
Dependent variable:SchoolHoursExtensiveIntensive
 enrollmentworkedmarginmargin
 IIIIIIIV
A. Baseline effects—equation (1)
I. By gender
Effect of labor law 20150.036***−1.865***−0.036***−1.938***
(0.006)(0.251)(0.007)(0.725)
Male−0.017***2.630***0.090***3.283***
(0.004)(0.294)(0.007)(0.432)
Male × labor law 2015−0.027***2.167***0.047***1.478**
(0.008)(0.416)(0.009)(0.658)
Mean (girls)0.9580.8500.04718.126
Mean (boys)0.9502.4320.113221.557
Observations123,487123,487123,48715,911
B. Individual fixed effects—equation (2)
I. Full sample
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.028***−0.733***−0.020**−0.486
(0.005)(0.267)(0.009)(1.519)
Mean0.9322.4240.10323.516
Observations23,56223,56223,5623,035
II. Children working pre-reform
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.047***−1.713−0.075**−0.471
(0.016)(1.110)(0.036)(1.534)
Mean0.81412.5560.53423.516
Observations4,1554,1554,1552,121
III. Children not working pre-reform
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.022***−0.721***−0.017**
(0.005)(0.213)(0.007)
Mean0.960
Observations19,40719,40719,407914

Source: Mexican National Survey on Occupation and Employment (ENOE) for the years 2013 to 2017, authors’ analysis.

Note: Results are obtained from DiD models. The regressions for equation (1) (our main specification) include the full set of controls, state fixed effects, quarter-by-year fixed effects, and state-specific time trend. Standard errors in parentheses (clustered at the birth-month-survey year level). The regressions for equation (2) include the full set of controls, individual fixed effects, birth rank, state fixed effects, quarter-by-year fixed effects, and state-specific time trend. Robust standard errors in parentheses. ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1.

Table 3.

Effect of the Labor Law Reform in 2015 on School Enrollment and Employment

Dependent variable:SchoolHoursExtensiveIntensive
 enrollmentworkedmarginmargin
 IIIIIIIV
A. Baseline effects—equation (1)
I. By gender
Effect of labor law 20150.036***−1.865***−0.036***−1.938***
(0.006)(0.251)(0.007)(0.725)
Male−0.017***2.630***0.090***3.283***
(0.004)(0.294)(0.007)(0.432)
Male × labor law 2015−0.027***2.167***0.047***1.478**
(0.008)(0.416)(0.009)(0.658)
Mean (girls)0.9580.8500.04718.126
Mean (boys)0.9502.4320.113221.557
Observations123,487123,487123,48715,911
B. Individual fixed effects—equation (2)
I. Full sample
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.028***−0.733***−0.020**−0.486
(0.005)(0.267)(0.009)(1.519)
Mean0.9322.4240.10323.516
Observations23,56223,56223,5623,035
II. Children working pre-reform
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.047***−1.713−0.075**−0.471
(0.016)(1.110)(0.036)(1.534)
Mean0.81412.5560.53423.516
Observations4,1554,1554,1552,121
III. Children not working pre-reform
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.022***−0.721***−0.017**
(0.005)(0.213)(0.007)
Mean0.960
Observations19,40719,40719,407914
Dependent variable:SchoolHoursExtensiveIntensive
 enrollmentworkedmarginmargin
 IIIIIIIV
A. Baseline effects—equation (1)
I. By gender
Effect of labor law 20150.036***−1.865***−0.036***−1.938***
(0.006)(0.251)(0.007)(0.725)
Male−0.017***2.630***0.090***3.283***
(0.004)(0.294)(0.007)(0.432)
Male × labor law 2015−0.027***2.167***0.047***1.478**
(0.008)(0.416)(0.009)(0.658)
Mean (girls)0.9580.8500.04718.126
Mean (boys)0.9502.4320.113221.557
Observations123,487123,487123,48715,911
B. Individual fixed effects—equation (2)
I. Full sample
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.028***−0.733***−0.020**−0.486
(0.005)(0.267)(0.009)(1.519)
Mean0.9322.4240.10323.516
Observations23,56223,56223,5623,035
II. Children working pre-reform
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.047***−1.713−0.075**−0.471
(0.016)(1.110)(0.036)(1.534)
Mean0.81412.5560.53423.516
Observations4,1554,1554,1552,121
III. Children not working pre-reform
Born 12/06–31/12 2000 × labor law 20150.022***−0.721***−0.017**
(0.005)(0.213)(0.007)
Mean0.960
Observations19,40719,40719,407914

Source: Mexican National Survey on Occupation and Employment (ENOE) for the years 2013 to 2017, authors’ analysis.

Note: Results are obtained from DiD models. The regressions for equation (1) (our main specification) include the full set of controls, state fixed effects, quarter-by-year fixed effects, and state-specific time trend. Standard errors in parentheses (clustered at the birth-month-survey year level). The regressions for equation (2) include the full set of controls, individual fixed effects, birth rank, state fixed effects, quarter-by-year fixed effects, and state-specific time trend. Robust standard errors in parentheses. ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close