Authors and model . | Approach and components . |
---|---|
Jeste & Lee (2019) | Identified cIdentified components of wisdom models that are consistent with neurobiological, developmental, and evolutionary perspectives: Wisdom is “a complex human trait with several specific components: social decision making, emotional regulation, prosocial behaviors such as empathy and compassion, self-reflection, acceptance of uncertainty, decisiveness, and spirituality” |
Karami et al. (2020): Polyhedron model | Reviewed wisdom conceptions from the fields of psychology, management, and education and identified three cognitive components (knowledge management; sound judgment and decision-making; and intelligence and creative thinking) and three noncognitive components (self-regulation; openness and tolerance; and altruism and moral maturity). |
Grossmann et al. (2020): Common-denominator model | Conducted an expert survey to identify elements of wisdom on which the experts agreed. The resulting common-denominator model includes two broad components: perspectival meta-cognition (balancing different viewpoints, epistemic humility, context adaptability, and multiple perspectives) and moral aspirations. |
Glück & Weststrate (2022): “elephant model” of wise behavior in difficult life situations. | Three broad noncognitive components (an exploratory orientation, concern for others, and emotion regulation) predict whether people are able to maintain a “wise” state of mind even in challenging situations, which enables them to fully access their cognitive wisdom capacities (knowledge about life and oneself, metacognitive capacities, and self-reflection). |
Authors and model . | Approach and components . |
---|---|
Jeste & Lee (2019) | Identified cIdentified components of wisdom models that are consistent with neurobiological, developmental, and evolutionary perspectives: Wisdom is “a complex human trait with several specific components: social decision making, emotional regulation, prosocial behaviors such as empathy and compassion, self-reflection, acceptance of uncertainty, decisiveness, and spirituality” |
Karami et al. (2020): Polyhedron model | Reviewed wisdom conceptions from the fields of psychology, management, and education and identified three cognitive components (knowledge management; sound judgment and decision-making; and intelligence and creative thinking) and three noncognitive components (self-regulation; openness and tolerance; and altruism and moral maturity). |
Grossmann et al. (2020): Common-denominator model | Conducted an expert survey to identify elements of wisdom on which the experts agreed. The resulting common-denominator model includes two broad components: perspectival meta-cognition (balancing different viewpoints, epistemic humility, context adaptability, and multiple perspectives) and moral aspirations. |
Glück & Weststrate (2022): “elephant model” of wise behavior in difficult life situations. | Three broad noncognitive components (an exploratory orientation, concern for others, and emotion regulation) predict whether people are able to maintain a “wise” state of mind even in challenging situations, which enables them to fully access their cognitive wisdom capacities (knowledge about life and oneself, metacognitive capacities, and self-reflection). |
Authors and model . | Approach and components . |
---|---|
Jeste & Lee (2019) | Identified cIdentified components of wisdom models that are consistent with neurobiological, developmental, and evolutionary perspectives: Wisdom is “a complex human trait with several specific components: social decision making, emotional regulation, prosocial behaviors such as empathy and compassion, self-reflection, acceptance of uncertainty, decisiveness, and spirituality” |
Karami et al. (2020): Polyhedron model | Reviewed wisdom conceptions from the fields of psychology, management, and education and identified three cognitive components (knowledge management; sound judgment and decision-making; and intelligence and creative thinking) and three noncognitive components (self-regulation; openness and tolerance; and altruism and moral maturity). |
Grossmann et al. (2020): Common-denominator model | Conducted an expert survey to identify elements of wisdom on which the experts agreed. The resulting common-denominator model includes two broad components: perspectival meta-cognition (balancing different viewpoints, epistemic humility, context adaptability, and multiple perspectives) and moral aspirations. |
Glück & Weststrate (2022): “elephant model” of wise behavior in difficult life situations. | Three broad noncognitive components (an exploratory orientation, concern for others, and emotion regulation) predict whether people are able to maintain a “wise” state of mind even in challenging situations, which enables them to fully access their cognitive wisdom capacities (knowledge about life and oneself, metacognitive capacities, and self-reflection). |
Authors and model . | Approach and components . |
---|---|
Jeste & Lee (2019) | Identified cIdentified components of wisdom models that are consistent with neurobiological, developmental, and evolutionary perspectives: Wisdom is “a complex human trait with several specific components: social decision making, emotional regulation, prosocial behaviors such as empathy and compassion, self-reflection, acceptance of uncertainty, decisiveness, and spirituality” |
Karami et al. (2020): Polyhedron model | Reviewed wisdom conceptions from the fields of psychology, management, and education and identified three cognitive components (knowledge management; sound judgment and decision-making; and intelligence and creative thinking) and three noncognitive components (self-regulation; openness and tolerance; and altruism and moral maturity). |
Grossmann et al. (2020): Common-denominator model | Conducted an expert survey to identify elements of wisdom on which the experts agreed. The resulting common-denominator model includes two broad components: perspectival meta-cognition (balancing different viewpoints, epistemic humility, context adaptability, and multiple perspectives) and moral aspirations. |
Glück & Weststrate (2022): “elephant model” of wise behavior in difficult life situations. | Three broad noncognitive components (an exploratory orientation, concern for others, and emotion regulation) predict whether people are able to maintain a “wise” state of mind even in challenging situations, which enables them to fully access their cognitive wisdom capacities (knowledge about life and oneself, metacognitive capacities, and self-reflection). |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.