Heat transfer in each model through all 18 TEGs at the maximum exhaust mass flow rate for two different TEG array configurations
| Model name . | |${\boldsymbol{Q}}_{\boldsymbol{h}}$| . | Efficiency (|$\frac{{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\boldsymbol{output}}}{{\boldsymbol{Q}}_{\boldsymbol{h}}}$|) . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series configuration . | Parallel configuration . | ||
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow | 13 590.53076 | 1.18610 | 1.18904 |
| Model 2—pyramid fin co-directional flow | 12 276.52971 | 1.04467 | 1.05132 |
| Model 3—hexagonal wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow | 13 470.77991 | 1.16489 | 1.16781 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin counter-flow | 13 590.11818 | 1.18503 | 1.18739 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 2 system | 20 443.27715 | 1.25724 | 1.26693 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 3 system | 24 903.13591 | 1.47858 | 1.48263 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 4 system | 27 763.60588 | 1.70491 | 1.72235 |
| Model name . | |${\boldsymbol{Q}}_{\boldsymbol{h}}$| . | Efficiency (|$\frac{{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\boldsymbol{output}}}{{\boldsymbol{Q}}_{\boldsymbol{h}}}$|) . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series configuration . | Parallel configuration . | ||
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow | 13 590.53076 | 1.18610 | 1.18904 |
| Model 2—pyramid fin co-directional flow | 12 276.52971 | 1.04467 | 1.05132 |
| Model 3—hexagonal wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow | 13 470.77991 | 1.16489 | 1.16781 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin counter-flow | 13 590.11818 | 1.18503 | 1.18739 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 2 system | 20 443.27715 | 1.25724 | 1.26693 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 3 system | 24 903.13591 | 1.47858 | 1.48263 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 4 system | 27 763.60588 | 1.70491 | 1.72235 |
Heat transfer in each model through all 18 TEGs at the maximum exhaust mass flow rate for two different TEG array configurations
| Model name . | |${\boldsymbol{Q}}_{\boldsymbol{h}}$| . | Efficiency (|$\frac{{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\boldsymbol{output}}}{{\boldsymbol{Q}}_{\boldsymbol{h}}}$|) . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series configuration . | Parallel configuration . | ||
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow | 13 590.53076 | 1.18610 | 1.18904 |
| Model 2—pyramid fin co-directional flow | 12 276.52971 | 1.04467 | 1.05132 |
| Model 3—hexagonal wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow | 13 470.77991 | 1.16489 | 1.16781 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin counter-flow | 13 590.11818 | 1.18503 | 1.18739 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 2 system | 20 443.27715 | 1.25724 | 1.26693 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 3 system | 24 903.13591 | 1.47858 | 1.48263 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 4 system | 27 763.60588 | 1.70491 | 1.72235 |
| Model name . | |${\boldsymbol{Q}}_{\boldsymbol{h}}$| . | Efficiency (|$\frac{{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\boldsymbol{output}}}{{\boldsymbol{Q}}_{\boldsymbol{h}}}$|) . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series configuration . | Parallel configuration . | ||
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow | 13 590.53076 | 1.18610 | 1.18904 |
| Model 2—pyramid fin co-directional flow | 12 276.52971 | 1.04467 | 1.05132 |
| Model 3—hexagonal wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow | 13 470.77991 | 1.16489 | 1.16781 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin counter-flow | 13 590.11818 | 1.18503 | 1.18739 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 2 system | 20 443.27715 | 1.25724 | 1.26693 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 3 system | 24 903.13591 | 1.47858 | 1.48263 |
| Model 1—wall-to-wall fin co-directional flow 4 system | 27 763.60588 | 1.70491 | 1.72235 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
