Percentage of predatory mites alive after 120 h of exposure to different groups of insecticide treatments. Comparisons are based on the preplanned contrasts
Contrast . | Predatory mite survival marginal means (%) . | Difference between survival marginal means (Δμ) . | Δμ LCL . | Δμ UCL . | UCL*LCL > 0 . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 79.17 | 16.73(%) | 62.44 | 52.8 | 74.2 | * |
C2 | 18.78 | 12.58 | 6.2 | 0.7 | 11.3 | * |
C3 | 13.41 | 23.99 | −10.58 | 17.9 | −3.6 | * |
C4 | 2.47 | 22.27 | −19.8 | 29.6 | −12.1 | * |
C5 | 17.61 | 30.16 | −12.55 | 24.7 | −1.1 | * |
C6 | 8.44 | 18.10 | −9.66 | 18.6 | −0.22 | * |
Contrast . | Predatory mite survival marginal means (%) . | Difference between survival marginal means (Δμ) . | Δμ LCL . | Δμ UCL . | UCL*LCL > 0 . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 79.17 | 16.73(%) | 62.44 | 52.8 | 74.2 | * |
C2 | 18.78 | 12.58 | 6.2 | 0.7 | 11.3 | * |
C3 | 13.41 | 23.99 | −10.58 | 17.9 | −3.6 | * |
C4 | 2.47 | 22.27 | −19.8 | 29.6 | −12.1 | * |
C5 | 17.61 | 30.16 | −12.55 | 24.7 | −1.1 | * |
C6 | 8.44 | 18.10 | −9.66 | 18.6 | −0.22 | * |
The “Predatory mite survival marginal means (%)” column includes 2 subcolumns that show the mean percentage survival of predatory mites across 3 species for the 2 conditions being compared. The conditions are listed in the same order as described in Table 2. The differences in marginal means (Δ μ) were calculated by subtracting the mean of condition 1 from that of condition 2 in each contrast. Positive values indicate higher percentage survival of predatory mites for condition 1 of the contrast, while negative values indicate higher survival for condition 2. The “LCL” and “UCL” columns show the lower and upper credible intervals of Δμ, respectively. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between the contrast comparisons. Significance was computed by establishing whether the product of UCL and LCL overlap with zero.
Percentage of predatory mites alive after 120 h of exposure to different groups of insecticide treatments. Comparisons are based on the preplanned contrasts
Contrast . | Predatory mite survival marginal means (%) . | Difference between survival marginal means (Δμ) . | Δμ LCL . | Δμ UCL . | UCL*LCL > 0 . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 79.17 | 16.73(%) | 62.44 | 52.8 | 74.2 | * |
C2 | 18.78 | 12.58 | 6.2 | 0.7 | 11.3 | * |
C3 | 13.41 | 23.99 | −10.58 | 17.9 | −3.6 | * |
C4 | 2.47 | 22.27 | −19.8 | 29.6 | −12.1 | * |
C5 | 17.61 | 30.16 | −12.55 | 24.7 | −1.1 | * |
C6 | 8.44 | 18.10 | −9.66 | 18.6 | −0.22 | * |
Contrast . | Predatory mite survival marginal means (%) . | Difference between survival marginal means (Δμ) . | Δμ LCL . | Δμ UCL . | UCL*LCL > 0 . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 79.17 | 16.73(%) | 62.44 | 52.8 | 74.2 | * |
C2 | 18.78 | 12.58 | 6.2 | 0.7 | 11.3 | * |
C3 | 13.41 | 23.99 | −10.58 | 17.9 | −3.6 | * |
C4 | 2.47 | 22.27 | −19.8 | 29.6 | −12.1 | * |
C5 | 17.61 | 30.16 | −12.55 | 24.7 | −1.1 | * |
C6 | 8.44 | 18.10 | −9.66 | 18.6 | −0.22 | * |
The “Predatory mite survival marginal means (%)” column includes 2 subcolumns that show the mean percentage survival of predatory mites across 3 species for the 2 conditions being compared. The conditions are listed in the same order as described in Table 2. The differences in marginal means (Δ μ) were calculated by subtracting the mean of condition 1 from that of condition 2 in each contrast. Positive values indicate higher percentage survival of predatory mites for condition 1 of the contrast, while negative values indicate higher survival for condition 2. The “LCL” and “UCL” columns show the lower and upper credible intervals of Δμ, respectively. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between the contrast comparisons. Significance was computed by establishing whether the product of UCL and LCL overlap with zero.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.