Table 2:

Comparison of demographic data and clinical outcomes

Radio frequency group, n = 48 (%)Surgery group, n = 46 (%)P-value
Age (years)26.4 ± 11.524.0 ± 3.30.87
Sex (female/male)10/389/370.18
Hydrosis of the hand
 Dry36 (75%)44 (95.6%)<0.01a
 Not dry12 (25%)2 (4.4%)
Patient satisfaction
 Satisfied35 (73%)38 (82.6%)0.26
 Not satisfied13 (27%)8 (17.4%)
Compensatory hyperhidrosis
 Not present32300.78
 Mild1010
 Moderate56
 Severe10
Radio frequency group, n = 48 (%)Surgery group, n = 46 (%)P-value
Age (years)26.4 ± 11.524.0 ± 3.30.87
Sex (female/male)10/389/370.18
Hydrosis of the hand
 Dry36 (75%)44 (95.6%)<0.01a
 Not dry12 (25%)2 (4.4%)
Patient satisfaction
 Satisfied35 (73%)38 (82.6%)0.26
 Not satisfied13 (27%)8 (17.4%)
Compensatory hyperhidrosis
 Not present32300.78
 Mild1010
 Moderate56
 Severe10

Data are represented as means ± SD or n (%).

aP < 0.05.

Table 2:

Comparison of demographic data and clinical outcomes

Radio frequency group, n = 48 (%)Surgery group, n = 46 (%)P-value
Age (years)26.4 ± 11.524.0 ± 3.30.87
Sex (female/male)10/389/370.18
Hydrosis of the hand
 Dry36 (75%)44 (95.6%)<0.01a
 Not dry12 (25%)2 (4.4%)
Patient satisfaction
 Satisfied35 (73%)38 (82.6%)0.26
 Not satisfied13 (27%)8 (17.4%)
Compensatory hyperhidrosis
 Not present32300.78
 Mild1010
 Moderate56
 Severe10
Radio frequency group, n = 48 (%)Surgery group, n = 46 (%)P-value
Age (years)26.4 ± 11.524.0 ± 3.30.87
Sex (female/male)10/389/370.18
Hydrosis of the hand
 Dry36 (75%)44 (95.6%)<0.01a
 Not dry12 (25%)2 (4.4%)
Patient satisfaction
 Satisfied35 (73%)38 (82.6%)0.26
 Not satisfied13 (27%)8 (17.4%)
Compensatory hyperhidrosis
 Not present32300.78
 Mild1010
 Moderate56
 Severe10

Data are represented as means ± SD or n (%).

aP < 0.05.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close