Table 4

Association between mental stress–induced HF HRV change and rest HF HRV and the study endpoints in the pooled cohort

Mental stress–induced HF HRV decreaseLow rest HRV
Yes (n = 644)No (n = 104)Rate difference per 100 person-years (95% CI)HR (95% CI)Yes (n = 188)No (n = 560)Rate difference per 100 person-years (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Cardiovascular mortalitya
 Total no. of events3521720
 Rate per 100 person-years1.040.350.69 (0.1, 1.27)1.70.681.01 (0.17, 1.86)
 Model 12.79 (0.77, 10.19)2.41 (2.35, 2.48)
 Model 2 = Model 1 + demographic factorsb3.09 (0.81, 11.86)2.62 (2.03, 3.39)
 Model 3 = Model 2 + cardiovascular risk factorsc2.94 (1.12, 7.66)1.98 (1.75, 2.24)
 Model 4 = Model 3 + stress testingd2.63 (1.13, 6.12)1.87 (1.71, 2.04)
All-cause mortalitya
 Total no. of events6052738
 Rate per 100 person-years1.780.880.9 (0.03, 1.77)2.691.291.4 (0.33, 2.47)
 Model 11.95 (1.38, 2.77)2.03 (1.25, 3.31)
 Model 2 = Model 1 + demographic factorsb2.1 (1.47, 3.01)2.06 (1.15, 3.69)
 Model 3 = Model 2 + cardiovascular risk factorsc2 (1.5, 2.67)1.85 (1.14, 2.99)
 Model 4 = Model 3 + stress testingd2.23 (2.18, 2.28)1.77 (1.02, 3.07)
Mental stress–induced HF HRV decreaseLow rest HRV
Yes (n = 644)No (n = 104)Rate difference per 100 person-years (95% CI)HR (95% CI)Yes (n = 188)No (n = 560)Rate difference per 100 person-years (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Cardiovascular mortalitya
 Total no. of events3521720
 Rate per 100 person-years1.040.350.69 (0.1, 1.27)1.70.681.01 (0.17, 1.86)
 Model 12.79 (0.77, 10.19)2.41 (2.35, 2.48)
 Model 2 = Model 1 + demographic factorsb3.09 (0.81, 11.86)2.62 (2.03, 3.39)
 Model 3 = Model 2 + cardiovascular risk factorsc2.94 (1.12, 7.66)1.98 (1.75, 2.24)
 Model 4 = Model 3 + stress testingd2.63 (1.13, 6.12)1.87 (1.71, 2.04)
All-cause mortalitya
 Total no. of events6052738
 Rate per 100 person-years1.780.880.9 (0.03, 1.77)2.691.291.4 (0.33, 2.47)
 Model 11.95 (1.38, 2.77)2.03 (1.25, 3.31)
 Model 2 = Model 1 + demographic factorsb2.1 (1.47, 3.01)2.06 (1.15, 3.69)
 Model 3 = Model 2 + cardiovascular risk factorsc2 (1.5, 2.67)1.85 (1.14, 2.99)
 Model 4 = Model 3 + stress testingd2.23 (2.18, 2.28)1.77 (1.02, 3.07)

HF, high frequency; HRV, heart rate variability; HR, hazard ratio.

aThe median observation period was 5.6 (IQR, 3.6–7.6)

bAge, sex, and race (Black v. non-Black participants).

cBody mass index, smoking status, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, history of dyslipidaemia, previous myocardial infarction (MIPS) or ischaemia (MIMS2) with ST changes, and heart failure were originally included. Variables that did not significantly change the effect size were removed, and only hyperlipidaemia and heart failure were retained.

dAbnormal myocardial perfusion by conventional stress testing was defined as > 4 difference between the summed rest and stress scores.

Table 4

Association between mental stress–induced HF HRV change and rest HF HRV and the study endpoints in the pooled cohort

Mental stress–induced HF HRV decreaseLow rest HRV
Yes (n = 644)No (n = 104)Rate difference per 100 person-years (95% CI)HR (95% CI)Yes (n = 188)No (n = 560)Rate difference per 100 person-years (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Cardiovascular mortalitya
 Total no. of events3521720
 Rate per 100 person-years1.040.350.69 (0.1, 1.27)1.70.681.01 (0.17, 1.86)
 Model 12.79 (0.77, 10.19)2.41 (2.35, 2.48)
 Model 2 = Model 1 + demographic factorsb3.09 (0.81, 11.86)2.62 (2.03, 3.39)
 Model 3 = Model 2 + cardiovascular risk factorsc2.94 (1.12, 7.66)1.98 (1.75, 2.24)
 Model 4 = Model 3 + stress testingd2.63 (1.13, 6.12)1.87 (1.71, 2.04)
All-cause mortalitya
 Total no. of events6052738
 Rate per 100 person-years1.780.880.9 (0.03, 1.77)2.691.291.4 (0.33, 2.47)
 Model 11.95 (1.38, 2.77)2.03 (1.25, 3.31)
 Model 2 = Model 1 + demographic factorsb2.1 (1.47, 3.01)2.06 (1.15, 3.69)
 Model 3 = Model 2 + cardiovascular risk factorsc2 (1.5, 2.67)1.85 (1.14, 2.99)
 Model 4 = Model 3 + stress testingd2.23 (2.18, 2.28)1.77 (1.02, 3.07)
Mental stress–induced HF HRV decreaseLow rest HRV
Yes (n = 644)No (n = 104)Rate difference per 100 person-years (95% CI)HR (95% CI)Yes (n = 188)No (n = 560)Rate difference per 100 person-years (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Cardiovascular mortalitya
 Total no. of events3521720
 Rate per 100 person-years1.040.350.69 (0.1, 1.27)1.70.681.01 (0.17, 1.86)
 Model 12.79 (0.77, 10.19)2.41 (2.35, 2.48)
 Model 2 = Model 1 + demographic factorsb3.09 (0.81, 11.86)2.62 (2.03, 3.39)
 Model 3 = Model 2 + cardiovascular risk factorsc2.94 (1.12, 7.66)1.98 (1.75, 2.24)
 Model 4 = Model 3 + stress testingd2.63 (1.13, 6.12)1.87 (1.71, 2.04)
All-cause mortalitya
 Total no. of events6052738
 Rate per 100 person-years1.780.880.9 (0.03, 1.77)2.691.291.4 (0.33, 2.47)
 Model 11.95 (1.38, 2.77)2.03 (1.25, 3.31)
 Model 2 = Model 1 + demographic factorsb2.1 (1.47, 3.01)2.06 (1.15, 3.69)
 Model 3 = Model 2 + cardiovascular risk factorsc2 (1.5, 2.67)1.85 (1.14, 2.99)
 Model 4 = Model 3 + stress testingd2.23 (2.18, 2.28)1.77 (1.02, 3.07)

HF, high frequency; HRV, heart rate variability; HR, hazard ratio.

aThe median observation period was 5.6 (IQR, 3.6–7.6)

bAge, sex, and race (Black v. non-Black participants).

cBody mass index, smoking status, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, history of dyslipidaemia, previous myocardial infarction (MIPS) or ischaemia (MIMS2) with ST changes, and heart failure were originally included. Variables that did not significantly change the effect size were removed, and only hyperlipidaemia and heart failure were retained.

dAbnormal myocardial perfusion by conventional stress testing was defined as > 4 difference between the summed rest and stress scores.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close