Table 4.

68 per cent C.L. marginalized cosmological constraints in |$\Lambda$|CDM and wCDM using the combination of DES Y3 galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing measurements (2|$\times$|2pt) in HS. In parenthesis after the constraints are the improvements of the error bars when compared to the CS results from Pandey et al. (2022) and Porredon et al. (2022). Last column shows the agreement, calculated as described in Section 3.3.

redMaGiC modelScale cut|$\Omega _m$||$S_8$||$\sigma _8$|wHS–CS agreement
|$\Lambda$|CDM(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.325\pm 0.040$| (⁠|$-19~\%$|⁠)|$0.704\pm 0.029$| (⁠|$+2~\%$|⁠)|$0.681^{+0.045}_{-0.072}$||$1.03 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.328\pm 0.041$| (⁠|$-22~\%$|⁠)|$0.690\pm 0.034$| (⁠|$-15~\%$|⁠)|$0.665^{+0.041}_{-0.071}$||$0.29 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.301^{+0.037}_{-0.048}$| (⁠|$+7~\%$|⁠)|$0.682^{+0.025}_{-0.039}$| (0 %)|$0.685^{+0.042}_{-0.052}$||$-1.28\pm 0.29$| (⁠|$+8~\%$|⁠)|$0.95 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
MagLim modelScale cut|$\Omega _m$||$S_8$||$\sigma _8$|wHS–CS agreement
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 6 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.307^{+0.027}_{-0.037}$| (⁠|$+14~\%$|⁠)|$0.753\pm 0.024$| (⁠|$+29~\%$|⁠)|$0.748\pm 0.054$||$0.9 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 6 bins(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.315^{+0.028}_{-0.042}$| (⁠|$+9~\%$|⁠)|$0.739\pm 0.033$| (⁠|$+3~\%$|⁠)|$0.726\pm 0.061$||$1.27 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM, 6 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.302\pm 0.036$| (⁠|$+17~\%$|⁠)|$0.759\pm 0.032$| (⁠|$+20~\%$|⁠)|$0.760\pm 0.051$||$-1.01^{+0.24}_{-0.18}$| (⁠|$+2~\%$|⁠)|$0.35 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 4 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.324^{+0.032}_{-0.047}$| (⁠|$-7~\%$|⁠)|$0.779\pm 0.028$| (⁠|$+18~\%$|⁠)|$0.754\pm 0.064$||$0.02 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 4 bins(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.330^{+0.038}_{-0.043}$| (⁠|$-9~\%$|⁠)|$0.761\pm 0.035$| (⁠|$-3~\%$|⁠)|$0.731^{+0.058}_{-0.076}$||$0.14 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM, 4 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.321^{+0.040}_{-0.047}$| (⁠|$+17~\%$|⁠)|$0.745\pm 0.039$| (⁠|$+24~\%$|⁠)|$0.726^{+0.057}_{-0.067}$||$-1.26^{+0.34}_{-0.27}$| (⁠|$+7~\%$|⁠)0.42 |$\sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
redMaGiC modelScale cut|$\Omega _m$||$S_8$||$\sigma _8$|wHS–CS agreement
|$\Lambda$|CDM(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.325\pm 0.040$| (⁠|$-19~\%$|⁠)|$0.704\pm 0.029$| (⁠|$+2~\%$|⁠)|$0.681^{+0.045}_{-0.072}$||$1.03 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.328\pm 0.041$| (⁠|$-22~\%$|⁠)|$0.690\pm 0.034$| (⁠|$-15~\%$|⁠)|$0.665^{+0.041}_{-0.071}$||$0.29 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.301^{+0.037}_{-0.048}$| (⁠|$+7~\%$|⁠)|$0.682^{+0.025}_{-0.039}$| (0 %)|$0.685^{+0.042}_{-0.052}$||$-1.28\pm 0.29$| (⁠|$+8~\%$|⁠)|$0.95 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
MagLim modelScale cut|$\Omega _m$||$S_8$||$\sigma _8$|wHS–CS agreement
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 6 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.307^{+0.027}_{-0.037}$| (⁠|$+14~\%$|⁠)|$0.753\pm 0.024$| (⁠|$+29~\%$|⁠)|$0.748\pm 0.054$||$0.9 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 6 bins(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.315^{+0.028}_{-0.042}$| (⁠|$+9~\%$|⁠)|$0.739\pm 0.033$| (⁠|$+3~\%$|⁠)|$0.726\pm 0.061$||$1.27 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM, 6 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.302\pm 0.036$| (⁠|$+17~\%$|⁠)|$0.759\pm 0.032$| (⁠|$+20~\%$|⁠)|$0.760\pm 0.051$||$-1.01^{+0.24}_{-0.18}$| (⁠|$+2~\%$|⁠)|$0.35 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 4 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.324^{+0.032}_{-0.047}$| (⁠|$-7~\%$|⁠)|$0.779\pm 0.028$| (⁠|$+18~\%$|⁠)|$0.754\pm 0.064$||$0.02 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 4 bins(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.330^{+0.038}_{-0.043}$| (⁠|$-9~\%$|⁠)|$0.761\pm 0.035$| (⁠|$-3~\%$|⁠)|$0.731^{+0.058}_{-0.076}$||$0.14 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM, 4 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.321^{+0.040}_{-0.047}$| (⁠|$+17~\%$|⁠)|$0.745\pm 0.039$| (⁠|$+24~\%$|⁠)|$0.726^{+0.057}_{-0.067}$||$-1.26^{+0.34}_{-0.27}$| (⁠|$+7~\%$|⁠)0.42 |$\sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
Table 4.

68 per cent C.L. marginalized cosmological constraints in |$\Lambda$|CDM and wCDM using the combination of DES Y3 galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing measurements (2|$\times$|2pt) in HS. In parenthesis after the constraints are the improvements of the error bars when compared to the CS results from Pandey et al. (2022) and Porredon et al. (2022). Last column shows the agreement, calculated as described in Section 3.3.

redMaGiC modelScale cut|$\Omega _m$||$S_8$||$\sigma _8$|wHS–CS agreement
|$\Lambda$|CDM(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.325\pm 0.040$| (⁠|$-19~\%$|⁠)|$0.704\pm 0.029$| (⁠|$+2~\%$|⁠)|$0.681^{+0.045}_{-0.072}$||$1.03 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.328\pm 0.041$| (⁠|$-22~\%$|⁠)|$0.690\pm 0.034$| (⁠|$-15~\%$|⁠)|$0.665^{+0.041}_{-0.071}$||$0.29 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.301^{+0.037}_{-0.048}$| (⁠|$+7~\%$|⁠)|$0.682^{+0.025}_{-0.039}$| (0 %)|$0.685^{+0.042}_{-0.052}$||$-1.28\pm 0.29$| (⁠|$+8~\%$|⁠)|$0.95 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
MagLim modelScale cut|$\Omega _m$||$S_8$||$\sigma _8$|wHS–CS agreement
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 6 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.307^{+0.027}_{-0.037}$| (⁠|$+14~\%$|⁠)|$0.753\pm 0.024$| (⁠|$+29~\%$|⁠)|$0.748\pm 0.054$||$0.9 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 6 bins(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.315^{+0.028}_{-0.042}$| (⁠|$+9~\%$|⁠)|$0.739\pm 0.033$| (⁠|$+3~\%$|⁠)|$0.726\pm 0.061$||$1.27 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM, 6 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.302\pm 0.036$| (⁠|$+17~\%$|⁠)|$0.759\pm 0.032$| (⁠|$+20~\%$|⁠)|$0.760\pm 0.051$||$-1.01^{+0.24}_{-0.18}$| (⁠|$+2~\%$|⁠)|$0.35 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 4 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.324^{+0.032}_{-0.047}$| (⁠|$-7~\%$|⁠)|$0.779\pm 0.028$| (⁠|$+18~\%$|⁠)|$0.754\pm 0.064$||$0.02 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 4 bins(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.330^{+0.038}_{-0.043}$| (⁠|$-9~\%$|⁠)|$0.761\pm 0.035$| (⁠|$-3~\%$|⁠)|$0.731^{+0.058}_{-0.076}$||$0.14 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM, 4 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.321^{+0.040}_{-0.047}$| (⁠|$+17~\%$|⁠)|$0.745\pm 0.039$| (⁠|$+24~\%$|⁠)|$0.726^{+0.057}_{-0.067}$||$-1.26^{+0.34}_{-0.27}$| (⁠|$+7~\%$|⁠)0.42 |$\sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
redMaGiC modelScale cut|$\Omega _m$||$S_8$||$\sigma _8$|wHS–CS agreement
|$\Lambda$|CDM(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.325\pm 0.040$| (⁠|$-19~\%$|⁠)|$0.704\pm 0.029$| (⁠|$+2~\%$|⁠)|$0.681^{+0.045}_{-0.072}$||$1.03 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.328\pm 0.041$| (⁠|$-22~\%$|⁠)|$0.690\pm 0.034$| (⁠|$-15~\%$|⁠)|$0.665^{+0.041}_{-0.071}$||$0.29 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.301^{+0.037}_{-0.048}$| (⁠|$+7~\%$|⁠)|$0.682^{+0.025}_{-0.039}$| (0 %)|$0.685^{+0.042}_{-0.052}$||$-1.28\pm 0.29$| (⁠|$+8~\%$|⁠)|$0.95 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
MagLim modelScale cut|$\Omega _m$||$S_8$||$\sigma _8$|wHS–CS agreement
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 6 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.307^{+0.027}_{-0.037}$| (⁠|$+14~\%$|⁠)|$0.753\pm 0.024$| (⁠|$+29~\%$|⁠)|$0.748\pm 0.054$||$0.9 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 6 bins(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.315^{+0.028}_{-0.042}$| (⁠|$+9~\%$|⁠)|$0.739\pm 0.033$| (⁠|$+3~\%$|⁠)|$0.726\pm 0.061$||$1.27 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM, 6 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.302\pm 0.036$| (⁠|$+17~\%$|⁠)|$0.759\pm 0.032$| (⁠|$+20~\%$|⁠)|$0.760\pm 0.051$||$-1.01^{+0.24}_{-0.18}$| (⁠|$+2~\%$|⁠)|$0.35 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 4 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.324^{+0.032}_{-0.047}$| (⁠|$-7~\%$|⁠)|$0.779\pm 0.028$| (⁠|$+18~\%$|⁠)|$0.754\pm 0.064$||$0.02 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
|$\Lambda$|CDM, 4 bins(8,12) Mpc h−1|$0.330^{+0.038}_{-0.043}$| (⁠|$-9~\%$|⁠)|$0.761\pm 0.035$| (⁠|$-3~\%$|⁠)|$0.731^{+0.058}_{-0.076}$||$0.14 \sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
wCDM, 4 bins(8,6) Mpc h−1|$0.321^{+0.040}_{-0.047}$| (⁠|$+17~\%$|⁠)|$0.745\pm 0.039$| (⁠|$+24~\%$|⁠)|$0.726^{+0.057}_{-0.067}$||$-1.26^{+0.34}_{-0.27}$| (⁠|$+7~\%$|⁠)0.42 |$\sigma _{\text{2D}}$|
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close