Table 3:

Percentages and counts of papers with health literacy responsiveness elements, by whether or not training or education was provided, organized by themes and sub-themes

Training or education provided
ThemeSubthemeHealth literacy responsiveness measurable elementsYes (n = 70)No (n = 59)
Literacies
Assess patient’s health literacy39% (27)51% (30)
Assess patient’s general literacy (reading/writing) and/or numeracy16% (11)25% (15)
Digital literacy / e-health1% (1)*14% (8)
Andragogy
TeachingAction-oriented instruction17% (12)22% (13)
Demonstrations7% (5)15% (9)
Underlining key information9% (6)14% (8)
Check for understandingTeach-Back Technique66% (46)49% (29)
Chunk & Check10% (7)5% (3)
Communication
GeneralProvide information47% (33)58% (34)
Open-ended questions20% (14)15% (9)
PlainCommunicate clearly79% (55)69% (41)
Avoid jargon / use plain language66% (46)58% (34)
Limit information (2–3 concepts at a time)29% (20)32% (19)
Universal precautions (assume all have low HL)30% (21)27% (16)
BidirectionalEncourage client to ask questions24% (17)*44% (26)
Ask Me 3 (client to ask provider)7% (5)3% (2)
MultimodalUse images, diagrams or models40% (28)39% (23)
Technology, multimedia4% (3)**24% (14)
Read aloud1% (1)**17% (10)
More white space in written information3% (2)3% (2)
Respond to diversity
Cultural awareness27% (19)31% (18)
Adapt for CALD (e.g. translator services, family)20% (14)32% (19)
Consider personal and health beliefs14% (10)25% (15)
Avoid stigmatizing language and images3% (2)7% (4)
Social / relationalShared decision making (individual and community)11% (8)*27% (16)
Empowerment13% (9)24% (14)
Trust4% (3)**24% (14)
Respect7% (5)*19% (11)
Establish existing social supports6% (4)*20% (12)
Influence of socioeconomic factors on health11% (8)12% (7)
Training or education provided
ThemeSubthemeHealth literacy responsiveness measurable elementsYes (n = 70)No (n = 59)
Literacies
Assess patient’s health literacy39% (27)51% (30)
Assess patient’s general literacy (reading/writing) and/or numeracy16% (11)25% (15)
Digital literacy / e-health1% (1)*14% (8)
Andragogy
TeachingAction-oriented instruction17% (12)22% (13)
Demonstrations7% (5)15% (9)
Underlining key information9% (6)14% (8)
Check for understandingTeach-Back Technique66% (46)49% (29)
Chunk & Check10% (7)5% (3)
Communication
GeneralProvide information47% (33)58% (34)
Open-ended questions20% (14)15% (9)
PlainCommunicate clearly79% (55)69% (41)
Avoid jargon / use plain language66% (46)58% (34)
Limit information (2–3 concepts at a time)29% (20)32% (19)
Universal precautions (assume all have low HL)30% (21)27% (16)
BidirectionalEncourage client to ask questions24% (17)*44% (26)
Ask Me 3 (client to ask provider)7% (5)3% (2)
MultimodalUse images, diagrams or models40% (28)39% (23)
Technology, multimedia4% (3)**24% (14)
Read aloud1% (1)**17% (10)
More white space in written information3% (2)3% (2)
Respond to diversity
Cultural awareness27% (19)31% (18)
Adapt for CALD (e.g. translator services, family)20% (14)32% (19)
Consider personal and health beliefs14% (10)25% (15)
Avoid stigmatizing language and images3% (2)7% (4)
Social / relationalShared decision making (individual and community)11% (8)*27% (16)
Empowerment13% (9)24% (14)
Trust4% (3)**24% (14)
Respect7% (5)*19% (11)
Establish existing social supports6% (4)*20% (12)
Influence of socioeconomic factors on health11% (8)12% (7)

Significantly less than those not including health literacy responsiveness education at

*p < 0.05 or

**p ≤ 0.002.

Table 3:

Percentages and counts of papers with health literacy responsiveness elements, by whether or not training or education was provided, organized by themes and sub-themes

Training or education provided
ThemeSubthemeHealth literacy responsiveness measurable elementsYes (n = 70)No (n = 59)
Literacies
Assess patient’s health literacy39% (27)51% (30)
Assess patient’s general literacy (reading/writing) and/or numeracy16% (11)25% (15)
Digital literacy / e-health1% (1)*14% (8)
Andragogy
TeachingAction-oriented instruction17% (12)22% (13)
Demonstrations7% (5)15% (9)
Underlining key information9% (6)14% (8)
Check for understandingTeach-Back Technique66% (46)49% (29)
Chunk & Check10% (7)5% (3)
Communication
GeneralProvide information47% (33)58% (34)
Open-ended questions20% (14)15% (9)
PlainCommunicate clearly79% (55)69% (41)
Avoid jargon / use plain language66% (46)58% (34)
Limit information (2–3 concepts at a time)29% (20)32% (19)
Universal precautions (assume all have low HL)30% (21)27% (16)
BidirectionalEncourage client to ask questions24% (17)*44% (26)
Ask Me 3 (client to ask provider)7% (5)3% (2)
MultimodalUse images, diagrams or models40% (28)39% (23)
Technology, multimedia4% (3)**24% (14)
Read aloud1% (1)**17% (10)
More white space in written information3% (2)3% (2)
Respond to diversity
Cultural awareness27% (19)31% (18)
Adapt for CALD (e.g. translator services, family)20% (14)32% (19)
Consider personal and health beliefs14% (10)25% (15)
Avoid stigmatizing language and images3% (2)7% (4)
Social / relationalShared decision making (individual and community)11% (8)*27% (16)
Empowerment13% (9)24% (14)
Trust4% (3)**24% (14)
Respect7% (5)*19% (11)
Establish existing social supports6% (4)*20% (12)
Influence of socioeconomic factors on health11% (8)12% (7)
Training or education provided
ThemeSubthemeHealth literacy responsiveness measurable elementsYes (n = 70)No (n = 59)
Literacies
Assess patient’s health literacy39% (27)51% (30)
Assess patient’s general literacy (reading/writing) and/or numeracy16% (11)25% (15)
Digital literacy / e-health1% (1)*14% (8)
Andragogy
TeachingAction-oriented instruction17% (12)22% (13)
Demonstrations7% (5)15% (9)
Underlining key information9% (6)14% (8)
Check for understandingTeach-Back Technique66% (46)49% (29)
Chunk & Check10% (7)5% (3)
Communication
GeneralProvide information47% (33)58% (34)
Open-ended questions20% (14)15% (9)
PlainCommunicate clearly79% (55)69% (41)
Avoid jargon / use plain language66% (46)58% (34)
Limit information (2–3 concepts at a time)29% (20)32% (19)
Universal precautions (assume all have low HL)30% (21)27% (16)
BidirectionalEncourage client to ask questions24% (17)*44% (26)
Ask Me 3 (client to ask provider)7% (5)3% (2)
MultimodalUse images, diagrams or models40% (28)39% (23)
Technology, multimedia4% (3)**24% (14)
Read aloud1% (1)**17% (10)
More white space in written information3% (2)3% (2)
Respond to diversity
Cultural awareness27% (19)31% (18)
Adapt for CALD (e.g. translator services, family)20% (14)32% (19)
Consider personal and health beliefs14% (10)25% (15)
Avoid stigmatizing language and images3% (2)7% (4)
Social / relationalShared decision making (individual and community)11% (8)*27% (16)
Empowerment13% (9)24% (14)
Trust4% (3)**24% (14)
Respect7% (5)*19% (11)
Establish existing social supports6% (4)*20% (12)
Influence of socioeconomic factors on health11% (8)12% (7)

Significantly less than those not including health literacy responsiveness education at

*p < 0.05 or

**p ≤ 0.002.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close