Table 3.

Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between education level and alcohol-related morbidity

>1513–14
12
10–11
<9
HRHR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)
Crude1.001.25 (1.22–1.29)1.58 (1.54–1.62)1.99 (1.94–2.03)2.55 (2.49–2.62)
Model 11.001.21 (1.17–1.24)17.2 (15.0–19.3)1.49 (1.45–1.53)15.8 (14.6–16.6)1.78 (1.74–1.82)21.0 (20.1–21.9)2.14 (2.08–2.20)26.7 (25.8–27.4)
Model 21.001.17 (1.14–1.21)15.7 (13.3–18.5)1.41 (1.37–1.45)16.6 (14.8–18.3)1.64 (1.60–1.69)17.6 (15.9–18.8)1.97 (1.91–2.02)15.1 (13.6–16.2)
Model 31.001.16 (1.13–1.20)21.7 (18.8–25.2)1.40 (1.36–1.44)18.0 (16.4–20.2)1.62 (1.58–1.67)20.1 (18.4–22.2)1.93 (1.87–1.99)18.3 (16.7–20.2)
Model 41.001.17 (1.13–1.20)18.7 (16.1–21.9)1.40 (1.36–1.44)18.6 (17.1–20.6)1.62 (1.58–1.67)20.2 (18.4–22.3)1.94 (1.88–2.00)17.4 (15.8–19.3)
>1513–14
12
10–11
<9
HRHR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)
Crude1.001.25 (1.22–1.29)1.58 (1.54–1.62)1.99 (1.94–2.03)2.55 (2.49–2.62)
Model 11.001.21 (1.17–1.24)17.2 (15.0–19.3)1.49 (1.45–1.53)15.8 (14.6–16.6)1.78 (1.74–1.82)21.0 (20.1–21.9)2.14 (2.08–2.20)26.7 (25.8–27.4)
Model 21.001.17 (1.14–1.21)15.7 (13.3–18.5)1.41 (1.37–1.45)16.6 (14.8–18.3)1.64 (1.60–1.69)17.6 (15.9–18.8)1.97 (1.91–2.02)15.1 (13.6–16.2)
Model 31.001.16 (1.13–1.20)21.7 (18.8–25.2)1.40 (1.36–1.44)18.0 (16.4–20.2)1.62 (1.58–1.67)20.1 (18.4–22.2)1.93 (1.87–1.99)18.3 (16.7–20.2)
Model 41.001.17 (1.13–1.20)18.7 (16.1–21.9)1.40 (1.36–1.44)18.6 (17.1–20.6)1.62 (1.58–1.67)20.2 (18.4–22.3)1.94 (1.88–2.00)17.4 (15.8–19.3)

Model 1 is adjusted for sex, birth year, birth country, childhood socioeconomic position, parents’ psychiatric diagnoses, own previous psychiatric diagnoses, marital status, and number of children.

Model 2 is adjusted for covariates in Model 1 + job control in 2005.

Model 3 is adjusted for covariates in Model 1 + physical workload in 2005.

Model 4 is adjusted for covariates in Model 1 + physical workload and job control in 2005.

%Δ percent reduction in hazard ratio using the formula ((HR1–HR2)/(HR1–1)) × 100 where Model 1 is compared to the crude model and all other models are compared to Model 1.

Table 3.

Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between education level and alcohol-related morbidity

>1513–14
12
10–11
<9
HRHR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)
Crude1.001.25 (1.22–1.29)1.58 (1.54–1.62)1.99 (1.94–2.03)2.55 (2.49–2.62)
Model 11.001.21 (1.17–1.24)17.2 (15.0–19.3)1.49 (1.45–1.53)15.8 (14.6–16.6)1.78 (1.74–1.82)21.0 (20.1–21.9)2.14 (2.08–2.20)26.7 (25.8–27.4)
Model 21.001.17 (1.14–1.21)15.7 (13.3–18.5)1.41 (1.37–1.45)16.6 (14.8–18.3)1.64 (1.60–1.69)17.6 (15.9–18.8)1.97 (1.91–2.02)15.1 (13.6–16.2)
Model 31.001.16 (1.13–1.20)21.7 (18.8–25.2)1.40 (1.36–1.44)18.0 (16.4–20.2)1.62 (1.58–1.67)20.1 (18.4–22.2)1.93 (1.87–1.99)18.3 (16.7–20.2)
Model 41.001.17 (1.13–1.20)18.7 (16.1–21.9)1.40 (1.36–1.44)18.6 (17.1–20.6)1.62 (1.58–1.67)20.2 (18.4–22.3)1.94 (1.88–2.00)17.4 (15.8–19.3)
>1513–14
12
10–11
<9
HRHR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)HR (95% CI)%Δ (95% CI)
Crude1.001.25 (1.22–1.29)1.58 (1.54–1.62)1.99 (1.94–2.03)2.55 (2.49–2.62)
Model 11.001.21 (1.17–1.24)17.2 (15.0–19.3)1.49 (1.45–1.53)15.8 (14.6–16.6)1.78 (1.74–1.82)21.0 (20.1–21.9)2.14 (2.08–2.20)26.7 (25.8–27.4)
Model 21.001.17 (1.14–1.21)15.7 (13.3–18.5)1.41 (1.37–1.45)16.6 (14.8–18.3)1.64 (1.60–1.69)17.6 (15.9–18.8)1.97 (1.91–2.02)15.1 (13.6–16.2)
Model 31.001.16 (1.13–1.20)21.7 (18.8–25.2)1.40 (1.36–1.44)18.0 (16.4–20.2)1.62 (1.58–1.67)20.1 (18.4–22.2)1.93 (1.87–1.99)18.3 (16.7–20.2)
Model 41.001.17 (1.13–1.20)18.7 (16.1–21.9)1.40 (1.36–1.44)18.6 (17.1–20.6)1.62 (1.58–1.67)20.2 (18.4–22.3)1.94 (1.88–2.00)17.4 (15.8–19.3)

Model 1 is adjusted for sex, birth year, birth country, childhood socioeconomic position, parents’ psychiatric diagnoses, own previous psychiatric diagnoses, marital status, and number of children.

Model 2 is adjusted for covariates in Model 1 + job control in 2005.

Model 3 is adjusted for covariates in Model 1 + physical workload in 2005.

Model 4 is adjusted for covariates in Model 1 + physical workload and job control in 2005.

%Δ percent reduction in hazard ratio using the formula ((HR1–HR2)/(HR1–1)) × 100 where Model 1 is compared to the crude model and all other models are compared to Model 1.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close