Table C4.

MT modulator parameters.

Desig.|$N_o$||$\lambda _{\rm 0}$||$Cd$||$e_{\rm max}$|
(nm)(⁠|$\times 10^7$| nm|$^3$|⁠)
From Bailey et al. (2015)a and Cotton et al. (2022b)
E0505 |$\pm$| 51.75 |$\pm$| 0.050.98
E3502.6 |$\pm$| 2.01.920 |$\pm$| 0.1010.977 |$\pm$| 0.005
Initial fits
E07502.91.9131.000 |$\pm$| 0.009
E136494.9 |$\pm$| 3.72.005 |$\pm$| 0.2350.928 |$\pm$| 0.012
E2109494.92.0050.908 |$\pm$| 0.002
E359502.9 |$\pm$| 2.11.913 |$\pm$| 0.1470.979 |$\pm$| 0.005
Secondary fits
E1 & E2145501.7 |$\pm$| 2.11.730 |$\pm$| 0.1190.912 |$\pm$| 0.005
E0 & E366505.4 |$\pm$| 2.11.815 |$\pm$| 0.1490.983 |$\pm$| 0.006
Adopted values b
E1 & E2141503.61.7470.917 |$\pm$| 0.002
E0 & E339503.61.7470.977 |$\pm$| 0.003
Desig.|$N_o$||$\lambda _{\rm 0}$||$Cd$||$e_{\rm max}$|
(nm)(⁠|$\times 10^7$| nm|$^3$|⁠)
From Bailey et al. (2015)a and Cotton et al. (2022b)
E0505 |$\pm$| 51.75 |$\pm$| 0.050.98
E3502.6 |$\pm$| 2.01.920 |$\pm$| 0.1010.977 |$\pm$| 0.005
Initial fits
E07502.91.9131.000 |$\pm$| 0.009
E136494.9 |$\pm$| 3.72.005 |$\pm$| 0.2350.928 |$\pm$| 0.012
E2109494.92.0050.908 |$\pm$| 0.002
E359502.9 |$\pm$| 2.11.913 |$\pm$| 0.1470.979 |$\pm$| 0.005
Secondary fits
E1 & E2145501.7 |$\pm$| 2.11.730 |$\pm$| 0.1190.912 |$\pm$| 0.005
E0 & E366505.4 |$\pm$| 2.11.815 |$\pm$| 0.1490.983 |$\pm$| 0.006
Adopted values b
E1 & E2141503.61.7470.917 |$\pm$| 0.002
E0 & E339503.61.7470.977 |$\pm$| 0.003
a

MT parameters based on observation were derived for Bailey et al. (2020) but the lab based data from Bailey et al. (2015) has been preferred until now.

|$^{ b} \, \lambda _{\rm 0}$| and |$Cd$| based on error weighted average of secondary fits.

E0: 2014MAY.

E1: All UNSW runs.

E2: All Pindari runs.

E3: All MIRA OOS runs (N2022AUG, N2023FEB, N2023MAY to 2023-09-01).

Table C4.

MT modulator parameters.

Desig.|$N_o$||$\lambda _{\rm 0}$||$Cd$||$e_{\rm max}$|
(nm)(⁠|$\times 10^7$| nm|$^3$|⁠)
From Bailey et al. (2015)a and Cotton et al. (2022b)
E0505 |$\pm$| 51.75 |$\pm$| 0.050.98
E3502.6 |$\pm$| 2.01.920 |$\pm$| 0.1010.977 |$\pm$| 0.005
Initial fits
E07502.91.9131.000 |$\pm$| 0.009
E136494.9 |$\pm$| 3.72.005 |$\pm$| 0.2350.928 |$\pm$| 0.012
E2109494.92.0050.908 |$\pm$| 0.002
E359502.9 |$\pm$| 2.11.913 |$\pm$| 0.1470.979 |$\pm$| 0.005
Secondary fits
E1 & E2145501.7 |$\pm$| 2.11.730 |$\pm$| 0.1190.912 |$\pm$| 0.005
E0 & E366505.4 |$\pm$| 2.11.815 |$\pm$| 0.1490.983 |$\pm$| 0.006
Adopted values b
E1 & E2141503.61.7470.917 |$\pm$| 0.002
E0 & E339503.61.7470.977 |$\pm$| 0.003
Desig.|$N_o$||$\lambda _{\rm 0}$||$Cd$||$e_{\rm max}$|
(nm)(⁠|$\times 10^7$| nm|$^3$|⁠)
From Bailey et al. (2015)a and Cotton et al. (2022b)
E0505 |$\pm$| 51.75 |$\pm$| 0.050.98
E3502.6 |$\pm$| 2.01.920 |$\pm$| 0.1010.977 |$\pm$| 0.005
Initial fits
E07502.91.9131.000 |$\pm$| 0.009
E136494.9 |$\pm$| 3.72.005 |$\pm$| 0.2350.928 |$\pm$| 0.012
E2109494.92.0050.908 |$\pm$| 0.002
E359502.9 |$\pm$| 2.11.913 |$\pm$| 0.1470.979 |$\pm$| 0.005
Secondary fits
E1 & E2145501.7 |$\pm$| 2.11.730 |$\pm$| 0.1190.912 |$\pm$| 0.005
E0 & E366505.4 |$\pm$| 2.11.815 |$\pm$| 0.1490.983 |$\pm$| 0.006
Adopted values b
E1 & E2141503.61.7470.917 |$\pm$| 0.002
E0 & E339503.61.7470.977 |$\pm$| 0.003
a

MT parameters based on observation were derived for Bailey et al. (2020) but the lab based data from Bailey et al. (2015) has been preferred until now.

|$^{ b} \, \lambda _{\rm 0}$| and |$Cd$| based on error weighted average of secondary fits.

E0: 2014MAY.

E1: All UNSW runs.

E2: All Pindari runs.

E3: All MIRA OOS runs (N2022AUG, N2023FEB, N2023MAY to 2023-09-01).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close