Performance of GCI, CRAQ, and T2T-polish in evaluating simulated assembly issues in the Arabidopsis Col-CEN genome.a
Run . | Region . | GCI . | CRAQ . | T2T-polish . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | ||
5 INSs + 5 DELs | Simple | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.90 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
All | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.88 | |
10 INSs + 10 DELs | Simple | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
All | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | |
20 INSs + 20 DELs | Simple | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.88 | 0.39 | 0.54 | |
All | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
Run . | Region . | GCI . | CRAQ . | T2T-polish . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | ||
5 INSs + 5 DELs | Simple | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.90 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
All | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.88 | |
10 INSs + 10 DELs | Simple | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
All | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | |
20 INSs + 20 DELs | Simple | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.88 | 0.39 | 0.54 | |
All | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
Best result for each run, region, and category is highlighted in bold.
Performance of GCI, CRAQ, and T2T-polish in evaluating simulated assembly issues in the Arabidopsis Col-CEN genome.a
Run . | Region . | GCI . | CRAQ . | T2T-polish . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | ||
5 INSs + 5 DELs | Simple | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.90 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
All | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.88 | |
10 INSs + 10 DELs | Simple | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
All | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | |
20 INSs + 20 DELs | Simple | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.88 | 0.39 | 0.54 | |
All | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
Run . | Region . | GCI . | CRAQ . | T2T-polish . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | Precision . | Recall . | F1 score . | ||
5 INSs + 5 DELs | Simple | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.90 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
All | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.88 | |
10 INSs + 10 DELs | Simple | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
All | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | |
20 INSs + 20 DELs | Simple | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
Complex | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.88 | 0.39 | 0.54 | |
All | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
Best result for each run, region, and category is highlighted in bold.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.